한국 산림의 공익적 가치추정 선택실험법을 이용하여
Estimation of Public Values of Forest in Korea: Using Choice Experiment Approach
2
조회
0
다운로드
15
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The purpose of this study was to evaluate forest public functions by using Choice Experiments(CE). Experts interview, focus groups interview and pilot surveys were implemented for efficiency of experimental design. Nine attributes including eight forest public functions and tax payments were selected to estimate public value of forest in Korea. Attributes were the storage and purification function of water, the reduction of soil erosion, the prevention of landslide, sequestration of CO2, formation of living environment, the recreational function of the forest, ecosystem protection, forest landscape improvement and tax payment. 508 citizens were selected using Stratified Sampling Methods, and surveyed by face-to-face interviews. Implicit prices of the attributive levels have been calculated into monetary value per household. The results showed that most preferable forest public functions were formation of living environment, the storage and purification function of water and sequestration of CO2. Results of this study could be used as useful quantitative information related to sustainable forest management in Korea.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate forest public functions by using Choice Experiments(CE). Experts interview, focus groups interview and pilot surveys were implemented for efficiency of experimental design. Nine attributes including eight forest public functions and tax payments were selected to estimate public value of forest in Korea. Attributes were the storage and purification function of water, the reduction of soil erosion, the prevention of landslide, sequestration of CO2, formation of living environment, the recreational function of the forest, ecosystem protection, forest landscape improvement and tax payment. 508 citizens were selected using Stratified Sampling Methods, and surveyed by face-to-face interviews. Implicit prices of the attributive levels have been calculated into monetary value per household. The results showed that most preferable forest public functions were formation of living environment, the storage and purification function of water and sequestration of CO2. Results of this study could be used as useful quantitative information related to sustainable forest management in Korea.
참고문헌 (29)
- 곽승준, "수도권 도시림 보존의 경제적 편익 추정 - 광교산을 중심으로 -", 자원환경경제연구, 12(1), pp.1~27 (2003), 한국환경경제학회
- 김연수, "도시림의 가치평가에 관한 연구-서울시의 경우를 중심으로", 석사, pp.1994
- 산림의 공익기능 계량화 연구보고서, "국립 산림과학원", 국립산림과학원, ~ (2005)
- 산림의 공익기능 계량화 연구, "국립 산림과학원", 국립산림과학원, ~ (2007)
- 권오상, "가상순위결정법을 이용한 자연생태계의 경제적 가치평가", 경제학연구, 48(3), pp.177~196 (2000)
- 김용주, "팔당호 및 한강수질개선의 비시장가치 측정: 속성가치선택법을 이용하여", 자원환경경제연구, 14(2), pp.337~379 (2005), 한국환경경제학회
- 박석희, "산림의 관광위락가치 추정에 관한 연구: 설악산 및 속리산국립공원을 중심으로", 박사, pp.1985
- 산림청, "2008 임업통계연보" (2009), 산림청
- 2009년 나무심기 참고자료, "산림청", 산림청, ~ (2009)
- 유승훈, "컨조인트 분석을 이용한 서울시 대기오염영향의 환경비용 추정", 지역연구, 19(3), pp.1~18 (2003), 한국지역학회
- 윤여창, "산림자원의 휴양가치 산출을 위한 경제적평가방법론 비교연구", 환경경제연구, 1(1), pp.155~183 (1992)
- 임업의 공익적 기능 평가방법 개발 및 내부화 방안 연구, "윤여창", 서울대학교 농림부, ~ (2003)
- 이성태, "대구 팔공산 공원의 편익가치측정-여행비용접근법을 통하여", 자원·환경경제연구, 7(2), pp.211~228 (1999)
- 이주희, "여행비용법에 의한 가야산 국립공원의 휴양 수요", 한국산림휴양연구, 7(1), pp.35~40 (2003)
- 이창재, "수자원함양림 가치평가에 관한 연구", 박사, pp.1994
- 장철수, "산림의 공익적 가치와 환원에 대한 국민의식조사분석", 산림경제연구, 15(1), pp.9~21 (2007)
- Bateman, I.J., "The United Kingdom, in : Forests: Market & Intervention Failures-Five case Studies" (1992), OECD
- Bennett, J., "The Choice Modelling Approach to Environmental Valuation, New Horizons in Environmental Economics" (2001), Edward Elgar
- Carlsson, F., "Do Hypothetical and Actual Marginal Willingness to Pay Differ in Choice Experiments?", Journal of Environment Economics and Management, 41(2), pp.179~192 (2001)
- Hanley, N., "Using choice experiments to value the environment", Environmental and Resource Economics, 11(3), pp.413~428 (1998)
- Hanley, N., "Modelling Recreation Demand Using Choice Experiments: Climbing in Scotland", Environmental & Resource Economics, European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, 22(3), pp.449~466 (2002)
- "Marketing Research Methods in SAS"[URL]
- Lusk, J. L., "Demand for Beef from Cattle Administered Frowth Hormones or Fed Genetically Modified Corn: A Comparison of Consumers in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States", American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 85(1), pp.16~29 (2003)
- McFadden, D., "Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior, in : Frontiers in Econometrics" (1974), Academic Press
- Simon. H. A., "Invariants of Human Behavior", Annual Review of Psychology, 41, pp.1~9 (1990)
- Stern, S., "Simulation-Based Estimation", Journal of Economic Literature, 35, pp.2006~2039 (1997)
- Wibe, S., "Forests: Market & Intervention Failures-Five case Studies" (1992), OECD
- The social and environmental benefits of forests in Great Britain (Phase 2), Report to the Forestry Commission, Centre for Research in Environmental Appraisal and Management, "Willis, K.G.", University of Newcastle, ~ (2003)
- 合崎英男, "農業·農村の計画評価" (2005), 農林統計協會