본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effects of wild or mutated inoculants on rye silage and its rumen fermentation indices

1

조회

0

다운로드

7

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: This study was conducted to confirm the effects of new inoculants producing-antifungal or esterase substances on rye silage and its rumen fermentation indices by comparing wild with mutated types. Methods: Rye harvested at dough stage was ensiled into 3 L mini bucket silo (1 kg) for 90 d in triplicate following: distilled water at 20 μL/g (CON); Lactobacillus brevis 100D8 (AT) and its inactivation of antifungal genes (AT-m) at 1.2×105 cfu/g, respectively; and Leuconostoc holzapfelii 5H4 (FD) and its inactivation of esterase genes (FD-est) at 1.0×105 cfu/g, respectively. After silo opened, silage was sub-sampled for the analysis of ensiling quality and its rumen fermentation indices. Results: Among the wild type inoculants (CON vs AT vs FD), FD inoculant had higher (p<0.05) in vitro digestibilities of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber, the total degradable fraction, and total volatile fatty acid in rumen, while AT inoculant had higher (p<0.05) lactate, acetate, and lactic acid bacteria in silage. Silage pH and the potentially degradable fraction in rumen increased (p<0.05) by inactivation of antifungal activity (AT vs AT-m), but lactate, acetate, and lactic acid bacteria of silage decreased (p<0.05). In silage, acetate increased (p< 0.05) by inactivation of esterase activity (FD vs FD-est) with decreases (p<0.05) of pH, ammonia-N, lactate, and yeast. Moreover, inactivation of esterase activity clearly decreased (p<0.05) in vitro digestibilities of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber, the total degradable fraction, and total volatile fatty acid in the rumen. Conclusion: This study concluded that FD inoculant confirmed esterase activity on rye silage harvested at dough stage, while AT inoculant could not be confirmed with antifungal activity due to the absence of mold in all silages.

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to confirm the effects of new inoculants producing-antifungal or esterase substances on rye silage and its rumen fermentation indices by comparing wild with mutated types. Methods: Rye harvested at dough stage was ensiled into 3 L mini bucket silo (1 kg) for 90 d in triplicate following: distilled water at 20 μL/g (CON); Lactobacillus brevis 100D8 (AT) and its inactivation of antifungal genes (AT-m) at 1.2×105 cfu/g, respectively; and Leuconostoc holzapfelii 5H4 (FD) and its inactivation of esterase genes (FD-est) at 1.0×105 cfu/g, respectively. After silo opened, silage was sub-sampled for the analysis of ensiling quality and its rumen fermentation indices. Results: Among the wild type inoculants (CON vs AT vs FD), FD inoculant had higher (p<0.05) in vitro digestibilities of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber, the total degradable fraction, and total volatile fatty acid in rumen, while AT inoculant had higher (p<0.05) lactate, acetate, and lactic acid bacteria in silage. Silage pH and the potentially degradable fraction in rumen increased (p<0.05) by inactivation of antifungal activity (AT vs AT-m), but lactate, acetate, and lactic acid bacteria of silage decreased (p<0.05). In silage, acetate increased (p< 0.05) by inactivation of esterase activity (FD vs FD-est) with decreases (p<0.05) of pH, ammonia-N, lactate, and yeast. Moreover, inactivation of esterase activity clearly decreased (p<0.05) in vitro digestibilities of dry matter and neutral detergent fiber, the total degradable fraction, and total volatile fatty acid in the rumen. Conclusion: This study concluded that FD inoculant confirmed esterase activity on rye silage harvested at dough stage, while AT inoculant could not be confirmed with antifungal activity due to the absence of mold in all silages.

참고문헌 (30)

  1. Moore EB, "Rye cover crop effects on soil quality in no-till corn silage-soybean cropping systems", Soil Sci Soc Am J, 78, pp.968~976 (2014)[DOI]
  2. Bruckner PL, "factors influencing species and cultivar choice of small grains for winter forage", J Prod Agric, 3, pp.349~355 (1990)[DOI]
  3. 이병생, "호밀의 품종 및 수확시기가 사초생산성 및 품질에 미치는 영향", 한국축산학회지, 46(2), pp.227~234 (2004), 한국축산학회
  4. Filya I, "Nutritive value and aerobic stability of whole crop maize silage harvested at four stages of maturity", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 116, pp.141~150 (2004)[DOI]
  5. McDonald P, "The biochemistry of silage" (1991), Chalcombe Publ
  6. Lynch JP, "Fiber degradability, chemical composition and conservation characteristics of alfalfa haylage ensiled with exogenous fibrolytic enzymes and a ferulic acid esterase-producing inoculant", Can J Anim Sci, 94, pp.697~704 (2014)[DOI]
  7. Weinberg ZG, "Effect of lactic acid bacteria inoculants on in vitro digestibility of wheat and corn silage", J Dairy Sci, 90, pp.4754~4762 (2007)[DOI]
  8. Dalié DKD, "Lactic acid bacteria-potential for control of mould growth and mycotoxins : a review", Food Control, 21, pp.370~380 (2010)[DOI]
  9. Kim HS, "Screening and investigation Lactobacillius spp. to improve Secale cereale silage quality", Anim Sci J, 88, pp.1538~1546 (2017)[DOI]
  10. Kang TW, "Effects of an esterase-producing inoculant on fermentation, aerobic stability, and neutral detergent fiber digestibility of corn silage", J Dairy Sci, 92, pp.732~738 (2009)[DOI]
  11. Adesogan AT, "Ruminant Nutrition Symposium: Improving cell wall digestion and animal performance with fibrolytic enzymes", J Anim Sci, 92, pp.1317~1330 (2014)[DOI]
  12. Arriola KG, "Effect of fibrolytic enzyme application to low-and high-concentrate diets on the performance of lactating dairy cattle", J Dairy Sci, 94, pp.832~841 (2011)[DOI]
  13. Kim MJ, "Complete genome sequence of lanthionine-producing Lactobacillus brevis strain 100D8, generated by PacBio sequencing", Microbiol Resour Announc, 7, pp.e01220~18 (2018)[DOI]
  14. Hye Sun Kim, "Complete genome sequence and functional study of the fibrinolytic enzyme-producing bacterium Leuconostoc holzapfelii 5H4, a silage probiotic", Journal of Genomics, 5, pp.32~35 (2017), Ivyspring International Publisher[DOI]
  15. AOAC, "Official methods of analysis", AOAC International, ~ (2005)
  16. Tilley JMA, "A two-stage technique for the in vitro digestion of forage crops", J Br Grassl Soc, 18, pp.104~111 (1963)[DOI]
  17. Chaney AL, "Modified reagents for determination of urea and ammonia", Clin Chem, 8, pp.130~132 (1962)
  18. Muck RE, "Storage temperature effects on proteolysis in alfalfa silage", Trans ASASE, 31, pp.1005~1009 (1988)[DOI]
  19. Adesogan AT, "A novel, wireless, automated system for measuring fermentation gas production kinetics of feeds and its application to feed characterization", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 123-124, pp.211~223 (2005)[DOI]
  20. SAS Institute Inc, "SAS", STAT user’s guide: Version 9, 2002
  21. McDonald I, "A revised model for the estimation of protein degradability in the rumen", J Agric Sci, 96, pp.251~252 (1981)[DOI]
  22. Kim JG, "Effects of maturity at harvest and wilting days on quality of round baled rye silage", Asian-Australas J Anim Sci, 14, pp.1233~1237 (2001)[DOI]
  23. Young Ho Joo, "Effect of microbial inoculants on fermentation quality and aerobic stability of sweet potato vine silage", Animal Bioscience, 31(12), pp.1897~1902 (2018), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
  24. Danner H, "Acetic acid increases stability of silage under aerobic conditions", Appl Environ Microbiol, 69, pp.562~567 (2003)[DOI]
  25. 김진우, "Identification of Genes for Biosynthesis of Antibacterial Compound from Pseudomonas fluorescens B16, and Its Activity Against Ralstonia solanacearum", Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, 13(2), pp.292~300 (2003), 한국미생물·생명공학회
  26. Hobson PN, "The rumen microbial ecosystem" (1997), Blackie Academic and Professional
  27. Wells JE, "A bacteriocin-mediated antagonism by ruminal lactobacilli against Streptococcus bovis", FEMS Microbiol Ecol, 22, pp.237~243 (1997)[DOI]
  28. Piwonka EJ, "Effect of glucose fermentation on fiber digestion by ruminal microorganism in vitro", J Dairy Sci, 79, pp.2196~2206 (1995)[DOI]
  29. 이민경, "Changes in the ruminal fermentation and bacterial community structure by a sudden change to a high-concentrate diet in Korean domestic ruminants", Animal Bioscience, 32(1), pp.92~102 (2019), 아세아·태평양축산학회[DOI]
  30. Contreras-Govea FE, "Microbial inoculant effects on silage and in vitro ruminal fermentation, and microbial biomass estimation for alfalfa, bmr corn, and corn silages", Anim Feed Sci Technol, 163, pp.2~10 (2011)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Effects of New Inoculants on In vitro Digestibility and Fermentation Indices of High Moisture Rye Silage김삼철, Dong Hyeon Kim, Hyuk Jun Lee, Hyun Son, Ouk Kyu Han, Paradhipta H. V. Dimas, Seong Shin Lee, Young Ho Joo농업생명과학연구원 · 농업생명과학연구2018 · 제52권 제5호Effect of Homo or Heterofermentative Inoculants on Fermentation Characteristics and Aerobic Stability of Rye Silage곽연식, 김동현, 김삼철, 이성신, 이현준, 주영호, 한옥규, Dimas H. V. Paradipta농업생명과학연구원 · 농업생명과학연구2017 · 제51권 제5호Antifungal and carboxylesterase-producing bacteria applied into corn silage still affected the fermented total mixed ration김삼철, 이혁준, 주영호, Jeong Seung Min, Lee Seong Shin, Paradhipta Dimas Hand Vidya, Seo Myeong Ji, Seong Pil-Nam아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2023 · 제36권 제5호Effects of sodium diacetate and microbial inoculants on fermentation of forage rye김종근, Eun Chan Jeong, Farhad Ahmadi, Hak-Jin Kim, Li Li Wang, Yan Fen Li한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2023 · 제65권 제1호Effects of sodium diacetate or microbial inoculants on aerobic stability of wilted rye silage김종근, 김학진, Ahmadi Farhad, Jeong Eun Chan, Li Yan Fen, Wang li li아세아·태평양축산학회 · Animal Bioscience2022 · 제35권 제12호Effects of Hybrid and Inoculant on Rumen Digestibility and Fermentation Indices of Corn Silage김삼철, Dong Hyeon Kim, Hyuk Jun Lee, Paradhipta H. V. Dimas, Sang Bum Kim, Seong Shin Lee, Young Ho Joo농업생명과학연구원 · 농업생명과학연구2019 · 제53권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)