본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Relationship between body size traits and carcass traits with primal cuts yields in Hanwoo steers

1

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the correlation between body size traits, carcass traits, and primal cuts in Hanwoo steers.Methods: Sixty-one beef carcasses were classified for conformation and primal cut weight. Additionally, carcass weight, fat thickness, carcass dimensions, and <i>longissimus</i> muscle area were determined to complement the grading.Results: The average live weight and cold carcass weight were 759 and 469 kg, respectively. The mean carcass meat, fat, and bone proportions were 551, 298, and 151 g/kg, respectively. Primal cuts weights showed significant positive correlations (p<0.001) of 0.42 to 0.82 with live weight, carcass weight, and longissimus muscle area and a significant negative correlation with carcass fat (without shank, –0.38 to –0.10). Primal cut weights were positively correlated (p<0.01) with carcass length (0.41 to 0.77), forequarter length (0.33 to 0.57), 6th lumbar vertebrae–heel length (0.33 to 0.59), 7th cervical vertebrae carcass breadth (0.35 to 0.58), 5th to 6th thoracic vertebrae breadth (0.36 to 0.65), 7th to 8th thoracic vertebrae girth (0.38 to 0.63), and coxae girth (0.34 to 0.56) and non-significantly related to cervical vertebrae length and coxae thickness.Conclusion: There was a high correlation among live weight, carcass weight, <i>longissimus</i> muscle area, carcass length, 7th cervical vertebrae carcass breadth, 5th to 6th thoracic vertebrae breadth, and 7th to 8th thoracic vertebrae girth of the primal cuts yield. The correlation between fat and primal cut yields was highly significant and negative. Carcass length and 7th to 8th thoracic vertebrae girth, appear to be the most important traits affecting primal cut yields.

Abstract

Objective: This study was conducted to evaluate the correlation between body size traits, carcass traits, and primal cuts in Hanwoo steers. Methods: Sixty-one beef carcasses were classified for conformation and primal cut weight. Additionally, carcass weight, fat thickness, carcass dimensions, and longissimus muscle area were determined to complement the grading. Results: The average live weight and cold carcass weight were 759 and 469 kg, respectively. The mean carcass meat, fat, and bone proportions were 551, 298, and 151 g/kg, respectively. Primal cuts weights showed significant positive correlations (p<0.001) of 0.42 to 0.82 with live weight, carcass weight, and longissimus muscle area and a significant negative correlation with carcass fat (without shank, –0.38 to –0.10). Primal cut weights were positively correlated (p<0.01) with carcass length (0.41 to 0.77), forequarter length (0.33 to 0.57), 6th lumbar vertebrae–heel length (0.33 to 0.59), 7th cervical vertebrae carcass breadth (0.35 to 0.58), 5th to 6th thoracic vertebrae breadth (0.36 to 0.65), 7th to 8th thoracic vertebrae girth (0.38 to 0.63), and coxae girth (0.34 to 0.56) and non-significantly related to cervical vertebrae length and coxae thickness. Conclusion: There was a high correlation among live weight, carcass weight, longissimus muscle area, carcass length, 7th cervical vertebrae carcass breadth, 5th to 6th thoracic vertebrae breadth, and 7th to 8th thoracic vertebrae girth of the primal cuts yield. The correlation between fat and primal cut yields was highly significant and negative. Carcass length and 7th to 8th thoracic vertebrae girth, appear to be the most important traits affecting primal cut yields.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Joo ST, "Control of fresh meat quality through manipulation of muscle fiber characteristics", Meat Sci, 95, pp.828~836 (2013)[DOI]
  2. Drennan MJ, "The value of muscular and skeletal scores in the live animal and carcass classification scores as indicators of carcass composition in cattle", Animal, 2, pp.752~760 (2008)[DOI]
  3. Crouse JD, "Determinates of retail product of carcass beef", J Anim Sci, 42, pp.584~591 (1976)[DOI]
  4. Abraham HC, "Factors affecting beef carcass cutability : an evaluation of the USDA yield grades for beef", J Anim Sci, 50, pp.841~851 (1980)[DOI]
  5. May SG, "Beef carcass composi-tion of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness", J Anim Sci, 70, pp.2431~2445 (1992)[DOI]
  6. Tait RG, "Prediction of retail product and trimmable fat yields from the four primal cuts in beef cattle using ultrasound or carcass data", J Anim Sci, 83, pp.1353~1360 (2005)[DOI]
  7. Voges KL, "Retail cutting characteristics for US choice and US select beef subprimals", Meat Sci, 73, pp.116~131 (2006)[DOI]
  8. Miller MF, "Evaluation of live and carcass techniques for predicting beef carcass composition", Meat Sci, 23, pp.111~129 (1988)[DOI]
  9. Lu W, "Analysis of image-based measurements and USDA characteristics as predictors of beef lean yield", Meat Sci, 66, pp.483~491 (2004)[DOI]
  10. Lawrence TE, "Technical note : the united states department of agriculture beef yield grade equation requires modification to reflect the current longissimus muscle area to hot carcass weight relationship", J Anim Sci, 86, pp.1434~1438 (2008)[DOI]
  11. 이재구, "한우 후대검정우의 체척형질을 통한 부분육 생산량 추정", 한국축산학회지, 55(5), pp.373~380 (2013), 한국축산학회
  12. Perry D, "Muscle score : its usefulness in describing the potential yield of saleable meat from live steers and their carcasses", Aust J Exp Agric, 33, pp.275~281 (1993)[DOI]
  13. Perry D, "Meat yield and subjective muscle scores in medium weight steers", Aust J Exp Agric, 33, pp.825~831 (1993)[DOI]
  14. Conroy SB, "The relationship of live animal muscular and skeletal scores, ultrasound measurements and carcass classification scores with carcass composition and value in steers", Animal, 3, pp.1613~1624 (2009)[DOI]
  15. "Enforcement rule of the animal protection act. A proposal of the animal protection law. Animal protection law enforcement regulation article 6 animal slaughter method. Ministry of Agriculture, Food and Rural Affairs No. 68" (2013)[URL]
  16. "Livestock Sanitation Control Act Law. Livestock sanitation control act law enforcement regulation annex 1, Livestock products sanitary control act, Act No. 126272" (2014)[URL]
  17. SAS Institute Inc, "SAS", STAT Software for PC. Release 9. 4, 2014
  18. 이종문, "한우도체의 육량등급 요인 특성과 판매 정육량 추정", 한국축산식품학회지, 28(5), pp.604~609 (2008), 한국축산식품학회
  19. 이재구, "한우 후대검정우 체척, 도체형질 및 부분육간 상관분석", 한국축산학회지, 55(5), pp.351~358 (2013), 한국축산학회
  20. Williams RE, "Biceps femoris and rump fat as additional ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses", J Anim Sci, 75, pp.7~13 (1997)[DOI]
  21. Realini CE, "Gluteus medius and rump fat depths as additional live animal ultrasound measurements for predicting retail product and trimmable fat in beef carcasses", J Anim Sci, 79, pp.1378~1385 (2001)[DOI]
  22. Greiner SP, "Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle", J Anim Sci, 81, pp.1736~1742 (2003)[DOI]
  23. May SG, "Using live estimates and ultrasound measurements to predict beef carcass cutability", J Anim Sci, 78, pp.1255~1261 (2000)[DOI]
  24. Albertí P, "Carcass characterisation of seven Spanish beef breeds slaughtered at two commercial weights", Meat Sci, 71, pp.514~521 (2005)[DOI]
  25. Maeno H, "Prediction of carcass composition and individual carcass cuts of Japanese Black steers", Meat Sci, 96, pp.1365~1370 (2014)[DOI]
  26. Apple JK, "Determining beef carcass retail product and fat yields within 1 hour postmortem", J Anim Sci, 69, pp.4845~4857 (1991)[DOI]
  27. Herring WO, "Comparison of live and carcass equations predicting percentage of cutability, retail product weight, and trimmable fat in beef cattle", J Anim Sci, 72, pp.1107~1118 (1994)[DOI]
  28. Greiner SP, "Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle", J Anim Sci, 81, pp.1736~1742 (2003)[DOI]
  29. 이주영, "한우 거세우에서 주요 도체등급평가 형질들과 부분육 관련 형질들 간의 상관관계", 농업생명과학연구, 50(4), pp.99~111 (2016), 농업생명과학연구원[DOI]
  30. Hamlin KE, "Real-time ultrasonic measurement of fat thickness and longissimus muscle area : II. Relationship between real-time ultrasound measures and carcass retail yield", J Anim Sci, 73, pp.1725~1734 (1995)[DOI]
  31. 최연호, "Prediction of Retail Beef Yield Using Parameters Based on Korean Beef Carcass Grading Standards", 한국축산식품학회지, 30(6), pp.905~909 (2010), 한국축산식품학회
  32. Cannell RC, "Online evaluation of a commercial video image analysis system(Computer Vision System)to predict beef carcass red meat yield and for augmenting the assignment of USDA yield grades. United States Department of Agriculture", J Anim Sci, 80, pp.1195~1201 (2002)[DOI]
  33. Hamlin KE, "Real-time ultrasonic measurement of fat thickness and longissimus muscle area : I. Description of age and weight effect", J Anim Sci, 73, pp.1713~1724 (1995)[DOI]
  34. Crews DH, "Weaning, yearling, and preharvest ultrasound measures of fat and muscle area in steers, bulls, and heifers", J Anim Sci, 80, pp.2817~2824 (2002)[DOI]
  35. Wall PB, "Use of ultrasound to predict body composition changes in steers at 100 and 65 days before slaughter", J Anim Sci, 82, pp.1621~1629 (2004)[DOI]
  36. Ramsey CB, "Relation of beef carcass grades, proposed yield grades and fat thickness to separable lean, fat and bone", J Anim Sci, 21, pp.193~195 (1962)[DOI]
  37. Hodgson RR, "Development of a multivariate yield grade equation to predict compositional traits in mature cow carcasses", J Anim Sci, 70, pp.2159~2166 (1992)[DOI]
  38. Indurain G, "The relationship of carcass measurements to carcass composition and intramuscular fat in Spanish beef", Meat Sci, 82, pp.155~161 (2009)[DOI]
  39. "The primal cuts and sub-primal cuts in Korean evaluated" (2020)[URL]

관련 논문AI추천

Market weight, slaughter age, and yield grade to determine economic carcass traits and primal cuts yield of Hanwoo beef최승호, Dong Hoon Lee, Hee-Chan Woo, Hwa-Eun Jeon, Hyoung Ki Hong, Jae-Ik Lee, Kim Margarette C. Nogoy, Kimun Kwon, Seung-Ju Han, Sung-Min Heo한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2022 · 제64권 제1호한우 후대검정우 체척, 도체형질 및 부분육간 상관분석나종삼, 박병호, 이승수, 이재구, 조광현, 최연호, 최재관, 최태정한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2013 · 제55권 제5호한우 후대검정우의 체척형질을 통한 부분육 생산량 추정나종삼, 노승희, 도창희, 박병호, 이승수, 이재구, 조광현, 조충일, 최연호, 최재관, 최태정한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2013 · 제55권 제5호한우 거세우에서 주요 도체등급평가 형질들과 부분육 관련 형질들 간의 상관관계김종복, 이정구, 이주영농업생명과학연구원 · 농업생명과학연구2016 · 제50권 제4호경북지역 거세 한우의 출하 체중에 따른 도체특성과 부분육 생산수율강선문, 강세주, 김윤석, 김진형, 문성실, 박범영, 서현우, 성필남, 조수현, Hoa Van Ba농업생명과학연구원 · 농업생명과학연구2018 · 제52권 제2호한우의 체형형질이 도체형질에 미치는 영향김병우, 문원곤, 박종원, 선두원, 이정규, 전진태, 추효준한국축산학회 · 한국축산학회지2008 · 제50권 제6호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)