Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To establish the reliability and validity the Korean version of the Stroke Impact Scale (K-SIS) 3.0.Methods A total of 70 post-stroke patients were enrolled. All subjects were evaluated for general characteristics, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Modified Barthel Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The SF-36 and K-SIS 3.0 assessed their health-related quality of life. Statistical analysis after evaluation, determined the reliability and validity of the K-SIS 3.0.Results A total of 70 patients (mean age, 54.97 years) participated in this study. Internal consistency of the SIS 3.0 (Cronbach’s alpha) was obtained, and all domains had good co-efficiency, with threshold above 0.70. Test-retest reliability of SIS 3.0 required correlation (Spearman’s rho) of the same domain scores obtained on the first and second assessments. Results were above 0.5, with the exception of social participation and mobility. Concurrent validity of K-SIS 3.0 was assessed using the SF-36, and other scales with the same or similar domains. Each domain of K-SIS 3.0 had a positive correlation with corresponding similar domain of SF-36 and other scales (HADS, MMSE, and NIHSS).Conclusion The newly developed K-SIS 3.0 showed high inter-intra reliability and test-retest reliabilities, together with high concurrent validity with the original and various other scales, for patients with stroke. K-SIS 3.0 can therefore be used for stroke patients, to assess their health-related quality of life and treatment efficacy.
Abstract
Objective To establish the reliability and validity the Korean version of the Stroke Impact Scale (K-SIS) 3.0.Methods A total of 70 post-stroke patients were enrolled. All subjects were evaluated for general characteristics, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Modified Barthel Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The SF-36 and K-SIS 3.0 assessed their health-related quality of life. Statistical analysis after evaluation, determined the reliability and validity of the K-SIS 3.0.Results A total of 70 patients (mean age, 54.97 years) participated in this study. Internal consistency of the SIS 3.0 (Cronbach’s alpha) was obtained, and all domains had good co-efficiency, with threshold above 0.70. Test-retest reliability of SIS 3.0 required correlation (Spearman’s rho) of the same domain scores obtained on the first and second assessments. Results were above 0.5, with the exception of social participation and mobility. Concurrent validity of K-SIS 3.0 was assessed using the SF-36, and other scales with the same or similar domains. Each domain of K-SIS 3.0 had a positive correlation with corresponding similar domain of SF-36 and other scales (HADS, MMSE, and NIHSS).Conclusion The newly developed K-SIS 3.0 showed high inter-intra reliability and test-retest reliabilities, together with high concurrent validity with the original and various other scales, for patients with stroke. K-SIS 3.0 can therefore be used for stroke patients, to assess their health-related quality of life and treatment efficacy.
참고문헌 (16)
- Feigin VL, "Global burden of stroke: an underestimate. Authors’ reply", Lancet, 383, pp.1205~1206 (2014)
- Talabi OA, "A 3-year review of neurologic admissions in University College Hospital Ibadan, Nigeria", West Afr J Med, 22, pp.150~151 (2003)
- van der Zee CH, "Participation in the chronic phase of stroke", Top Stroke Rehabil, 20, pp.52~61 (2013)
- Boosman H, "Social activity contributes independently to life satisfaction three years post stroke", Clin Rehabil, 25, pp.460~467 (2011)
- Carod-Artal FJ, "Quality of life after stroke : the importance of a good recovery", Cerebrovasc Dis, 27(Suppl 1), pp.204~214 (2009)
- Vellone E, "Quality of life in stroke survivors: first results from the reliability and validity of the Italian version of the Stroke Impact Scale 3.0", Ann Ig, 22, pp.469~479 (2010)
- Carod-Artal FJ, "The stroke impact scale 3.0: evaluation of acceptability, reliability, and validity of the Brazilian version", Stroke, 39, pp.2477~2484 (2008)
- Duncan PW, "The stroke impact scale version 2.0:evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change", Stroke, 30, pp.2131~2140 (1999)
- Stewart JC, "Patient-reported measures provide unique insights into motor function after stroke", Stroke, 44, pp.1111~1116 (2013)
- Folstein MF, "“Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician", J Psychiatr Res, 12, pp.189~198 (1975)
- Appelros P, "Characteristics of the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale: results from a population-based stroke cohort at baseline and after one year", Cerebrovasc Dis, 17, pp.21~27 (2004)
- Mahoney FI, "Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index", Md State Med J, 14, pp.61~65 (1965)
- Zigmond AS, "The hospital anxiety and depression scale", Acta Psychiatr Scand, 67, pp.361~370 (1983)
- Ware JE Jr, "The MOS 36-item shortform health survey (SF-36). I: Conceptual framework and item selection", Med Care, 30, pp.473~483 (1992)
- Duncan PW, "Rasch analysis of a new stroke-specific outcome scale: the Stroke Impact Scale", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 84, pp.950~963 (2003)
- Poe SS, "The Johns Hopkins Fall Risk Assessment Tool: postimplementation evaluation", J Nurs Care Qual, 22, pp.293~298 (2007)