Post-stroke Aphasia as a Prognostic Factor for Cognitive and Functional Changes in Patients With Stroke: Ischemic Versus Hemorrhagic
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To investigate the comprehensive outcomes in aphasic patients, including their cognitive and functional status after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. It also aimed to clarify whether aphasia is a prognostic factor for cognitive and functional improvements in stroke patients. Methods Sixty-seven ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients in the subacute stage who had been diagnosed with aphasia using the Korean version of Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test (K-FAST) were included in the study. Forty-six stroke patients without aphasia were used as controls. All patients were examined with the Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery (K-WAB). Cognitive and functional assessments of the patients including the Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE), and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) were performed during admission and 4 weeks after the initial assessments. Results The initial and follow-up total K-MMSE and K-MBI scores were significantly lower in aphasic patients than in non-aphasic controls. The K-WAB scores highly correlated with the total K-MMSE scores at the follow-up stage in all aphasic stroke patients. The K-WAB scores moderately correlated with the follow-up scores of the K-MBI in ischemic stroke patients but not in hemorrhagic stroke patients. Conclusion Aphasia influences the cognitive and functional status of stroke patients and has a greater impact on cognitive improvement. Aphasia severity can be one of the prognostic factors for cognitive status in aphasic patients with stroke.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the comprehensive outcomes in aphasic patients, including their cognitive and functional status after ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke. It also aimed to clarify whether aphasia is a prognostic factor for cognitive and functional improvements in stroke patients. Methods Sixty-seven ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients in the subacute stage who had been diagnosed with aphasia using the Korean version of Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test (K-FAST) were included in the study. Forty-six stroke patients without aphasia were used as controls. All patients were examined with the Korean version of the Western Aphasia Battery (K-WAB). Cognitive and functional assessments of the patients including the Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE), and the Korean version of Modified Barthel Index (K-MBI) were performed during admission and 4 weeks after the initial assessments. Results The initial and follow-up total K-MMSE and K-MBI scores were significantly lower in aphasic patients than in non-aphasic controls. The K-WAB scores highly correlated with the total K-MMSE scores at the follow-up stage in all aphasic stroke patients. The K-WAB scores moderately correlated with the follow-up scores of the K-MBI in ischemic stroke patients but not in hemorrhagic stroke patients. Conclusion Aphasia influences the cognitive and functional status of stroke patients and has a greater impact on cognitive improvement. Aphasia severity can be one of the prognostic factors for cognitive status in aphasic patients with stroke.
참고문헌 (21)
- Watila MM, "Factors predicting poststroke aphasia recovery", J Neurol Sci, 352, pp.12~18 (2015)
- Boehme AK, "Effect of aphasia on acute stroke outcomes", Neurology, 87, pp.2348~2354 (2016)
- Plowman E, "Post-stroke aphasia prognosis : a review of patient-related and strokerelated factors", J Eval Clin Pract, 18, pp.689~694 (2012)
- Gialanella B, "Aphasia assessment and functional outcome prediction in patients with aphasia after stroke", J Neurol, 258, pp.343~349 (2011)
- Fonseca J, "Cognitive performance in aphasia due to stroke : a systematic review", Int J Disabil Hum Dev, 16, pp.127~139 (2017)
- Andersen KK, "Hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes compared : stroke severity, mortality, and risk factors", Stroke, 40, pp.2068~2072 (2009)
- Paolucci S, "Functional outcome of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke patients after inpatient rehabilitation : a matched comparison", Stroke, 34, pp.2861~2865 (2003)
- Bhalla A, "Differences in outcome and predictors between ischemic and intracerebral hemorrhage : the South London Stroke Register", Stroke, 44, pp.2174~2181 (2013)
- Tsai CF, "Comparisons of risk factors for intracerebral hemorrhage versus ischemic stroke in Chinese patients", Neuroepidemiology, 48, pp.72~78 (2017)
- Croquelois A, "Stroke aphasia : 1, 500consecutive cases", Cerebrovasc Dis, 31, pp.392~399 (2011)
- Klebic J, "Aphasia disorders outcome after stroke", Med Arh, 65, pp.283~286 (2011)
- 하지완, "한국판 프렌차이 실어증 선별검사(Korean version of Frenchay Aphasia Screening Test: K-FAST)의 신뢰도와 타당도: 뇌손상 환자를 대상으로", Communication Sciences and Disorders, 14(1), pp.46~57 (2009), 한국언어청각임상학회
- Thiel A, "The pathophysiology of poststroke aphasia : a network approach", Restor Neurol Neurosci, 34, pp.507~518 (2016)
- Tsouli S, "Significance of aphasia after first-ever acute stroke : impact on early and late outcomes", Neuroepidemiology, 33, pp.96~102 (2009)
- Dickey L, "Incidence and profile of inpatient strokeinduced aphasia in Ontario, Canada", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 91, pp.196~202 (2010)
- Gialanella B, "Predicting outcome after stroke : the role of aphasia", Disabil Rehabil, 33, pp.122~129 (2011)
- Chiu D, "Comparison of outcomes after intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke", J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 19, pp.225~229 (2010)
- Quinn TJ, "Barthel index for stroke trials : development, properties, and application", Stroke, 42, pp.1146~1151 (2011)
- Hsueh IP, "Comparison of the psychometric characteristics of the functional independence measure, 5 item Barthel index, and 10item Barthel index in patients with stroke", J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 73, pp.188~190 (2002)
- Barnay JL, "Feasibility of the cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in aphasic left hemispheric stroke patients", Ann Phys Rehabil Med, 57, pp.422~435 (2014)
- Helm-Estabrooks N, "Cognition and aphasia : a discussion and a study", J Commun Disord, 35, pp.171~186 (2002)