Feasibility of primary percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal radial approach in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction
0
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: Recently, distal radial approach (DRA), called as snuffbox approach, has gained the interest of interventional cardiologists, but there is a lack of data about the feasibility of DRA as an alternative route for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: A total of 138 patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in whom primary PCI via the DRA was attempted at three hospitals from October 2017 to September 2019 were analyzed. Results: The success rate of snuffbox puncture in the setting of STEMI was 92.8% (128/138). Successful primary PCI via the DRA was achieved in all 128 patients. The snuffbox puncture time, defined as the time interval from local anesthesia induction to successful sheath cannulation, was 2.7 ± 1.6 minutes, and snuffbox puncture was performed within 5 minutes in 95.3% of patients. Moreover, the percentage of the puncture time in the door-to-balloon time was 3.3%. The left DRA was selected in 103 patients (80.5%), and primary PCI via the DRA was performed using a 6-Fr guiding catheter in 125 patients (97.7%). There was no major bleeding; however, there were four cases (3.1%) of access-site complications, including three cases of local hematoma (≤ 5 cm diameter) and one case of local numbness, which improved 3 months later. Conclusions: In the setting of STEMI, the DRA could be a feasible alternative access route for primary PCI.
Abstract
Background/Aims: Recently, distal radial approach (DRA), called as snuffbox approach, has gained the interest of interventional cardiologists, but there is a lack of data about the feasibility of DRA as an alternative route for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Methods: A total of 138 patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in whom primary PCI via the DRA was attempted at three hospitals from October 2017 to September 2019 were analyzed. Results: The success rate of snuffbox puncture in the setting of STEMI was 92.8% (128/138). Successful primary PCI via the DRA was achieved in all 128 patients. The snuffbox puncture time, defined as the time interval from local anesthesia induction to successful sheath cannulation, was 2.7 ± 1.6 minutes, and snuffbox puncture was performed within 5 minutes in 95.3% of patients. Moreover, the percentage of the puncture time in the door-to-balloon time was 3.3%. The left DRA was selected in 103 patients (80.5%), and primary PCI via the DRA was performed using a 6-Fr guiding catheter in 125 patients (97.7%). There was no major bleeding; however, there were four cases (3.1%) of access-site complications, including three cases of local hematoma (≤ 5 cm diameter) and one case of local numbness, which improved 3 months later. Conclusions: In the setting of STEMI, the DRA could be a feasible alternative access route for primary PCI.
참고문헌 (19)
- Jolly SS, "Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes(RIVAL) : a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial", Lancet, 377, pp.1409~1420 (2011)
- Valgimigli M, "Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management : a randomized multicentre trial", Lancet, 385, pp.2465~2476 (2015)
- Ferrante G, "Radial versus femoral access for coronary interventions across the entire spectrum of patients with coronary artery disease : a meta-analysis of randomized trials", JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 9, pp.1419~1434 (2016)
- Valgimigli M, "Radial versus femoral access and bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin in invasively managed patients with acute coronary syndrome(MATRIX) : final 1-year results of a multicentre, randomised controlled trial", Lancet, 392, pp.835~848 (2018)
- Neumann FJ, "2018 ESC", EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization, 2019, pp.40, 87~165
- Ibanez B, "2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation : the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC)", Eur Heart J, 39, pp.119~177 (2018)
- Kiemeneij F, "Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography(ldTRA)and interventions(ldTRI)", EuroIntervention, 13, pp.851~857 (2017)
- 김용철, "Feasibility of Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Left Snuffbox Approach", Korean Circulation Journal, 48(12), pp.1120~1130 (2018), 대한심장학회
- Lee JW, "Real-world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a prospective observational study(LeDRA)", EuroIntervention, 14, pp.e995~e1003 (2018)
- Rao SV, "Clinical update : remaining challenges and opportunities for improvement in percutaneous transradial coronary procedures", Eur Heart J, 33, pp.2521~2526 (2012)
- Ziakas A, "Right arm distal transradial(snuffbox)access for coronary catheterization : initial experience", Hellenic J Cardiol, 61, pp.106~109 (2020)
- Soydan E, "Coronary angiography using the left distal radial approach: an alternative site to conventional radial coronary angiography", Anatol J Cardiol, 19, pp.243~248 (2018)
- Valsecchi O, "Early clinical experience with right and left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox in 52 consecutive patients", J Invasive Cardiol, 30, pp.218~223 (2018)
- Norimatsu K, "Importance of measurement of the diameter of the distal radial artery in a distal radial approach from the anatomical snuffbox before coronary catheterization", Heart Vessels, 34, pp.1615~1620 (2019)
- Kim Y, "Recannulation of distal radial artery for staged procedure after successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention", J Invasive Cardiol, 30, pp.E105~E106 (2018)
- Kim Y, "Successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention in patient with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction via left snuffbox approach : patient advantages", Cardiol J, 26, pp.198~199 (2019)
- Corcos T, "Distal radial access for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a state-of-theart review", Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 93, pp.639~644 (2019)
- Guo X, "Left radial access is preferable to right radial access for the diagnostic or interventional coronary procedures : a meta-analysis involving 22 randomized clinical trials and 10287 patients", PLoS One, 8, pp.e78499~ (2013)
- Gasparini GL, "First prospective multicentre experience with left distal transradial approach for coronary chronic total occlusion interventions using a 7 Fr Glidesheath Slender", EuroIntervention, 15, pp.126~128 (2019)