Successful transradial intervention via a radial recurrent artery branch from the radioulnar alpha loop using a sheathless guiding catheter
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The radial artery is generally the preferred access route in coronary angiography and coronary intervention. However, small size, spasm, and anatomical variations concerning the radial artery are major limitations of transradial coronary intervention (TRI). We describe a successful case involving a patient with coronary artery disease who underwent TRI via a well-developed radial recurrent artery branch from the radioulnar alpha loop using a sheathless guiding catheter.
Abstract
The radial artery is generally the preferred access route in coronary angiography and coronary intervention. However, small size, spasm, and anatomical variations concerning the radial artery are major limitations of transradial coronary intervention (TRI). We describe a successful case involving a patient with coronary artery disease who underwent TRI via a well-developed radial recurrent artery branch from the radioulnar alpha loop using a sheathless guiding catheter.
참고문헌 (15)
- Jolly SS, "Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials", Am Heart J, 157, pp.132~140 (2009)[DOI]
- Pristipino C, "Major improvement of percutaneous cardiovascular procedure outcomes with radial artery catheterization: results from the PREVAIL study", Heart, 95, pp.476~482 (2009)[DOI]
- Saito S, "Transradial coronary intervention in Japanese patients", Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 46, pp.37~41 (1999)[DOI]
- Franchi E, "Transradial versus transfemoral approach for percutaneous coronary procedures", Curr Cardiol Rep, 11, pp.391~397 (2009)[DOI]
- 윤영진, "Feasibility of Transradial Coronary Intervention Using a Sheathless Guiding Catheter in Patients With Small Radial Artery", Korean Circulation Journal, 41(3), pp.143~148 (2011), 대한심장학회
- Mamas M, "Use of the sheathless guide catheter during routine transradial percutaneous coronary intervention: a feasibility study", Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 75, pp.596~602 (2010)
- Stella PR, "Incidence and outcome of radial artery occlusion following transradial artery coronary angioplasty", Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn, 40, pp.156~158 (1997)[DOI]
- Dahm JB, "A randomized trial of 5 vs. 6 French transradial percutaneous coronary interventions", Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 57, pp.172~176 (2002)[DOI]
- Yoo BS, "Anatomical consideration of the radial artery for transradial coronary procedures: arterial diameter, branching anomaly and vessel tortuosity", Int J Cardiol, 101, pp.421~427 (2005)[DOI]
- Saito S, "Influence of the ratio between radial artery inner diameter and sheath outer diameter on radial artery flow after transradial coronary intervention", Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 46, pp.173~178 (1999)[DOI]
- Yokoyama N, "Anatomic variations of the radial artery in patients undergoing transradial coronary intervention", Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 49, pp.357~362 (2000)[DOI]
- Numasawa Y, "Anatomical variations affect radial artery spasm and procedural achievement of transradial cardiac catheterization", Heart Vessels, 29, pp.49~57 (2014)[DOI]
- Lo TS, "Radial artery anomaly and its influence on transradial coronary procedural outcome", Heart, 95, pp.410~415 (2009)
- Valsecchi O, "Failure of transradial approach during coronary interventions: anatomic considerations", Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 67, pp.870~878 (2006)[DOI]
- Louvard Y, "Loops and transradial approach in coronary diagnosis and intervention", Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 51, pp.250~252 (2000)[DOI]
