Reference diameter and characteristics of the distal radial artery based on ultrasonographic assessment
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Background/Aims: While distal radial artery (DRA) access is increasingly being used for diagnostic coronary angiography, limited information is available regarding DRA size. We aimed to determine the DRA reference diameters of Korean patients and identify the predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm. Methods: The outer bilateral DRA diameters were assessed using a linear ultrasound probe in 1,162 consecutive patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography. The DRA diameter was measured by the perpendicular angle in the dorsum of the hand, and the average values were compared by sex. DRA diameter < 2.3 mm was defined as unsuitable for routine diagnostic coronary angiography using a 5 Fr introducer sheath. Results: The mean DRA diameters were 2.31 ± 0.43 mm (right) and 2.35 ± 0.45 mm (left). The DRA was smaller in women than men (right: 2.15 ± 0.38 mm vs. 2.43 ± 0.44 mm, p < 0.001; left: 2.18 ± 0.39 mm vs. 2.47 ± 0.45 mm, p < 0.001). The DRA diameter was approximately 20% smaller than the radial artery diameter. A total of 630 (54.2%) and 574 (49.4%) patients had DRA diameter < 2.3 mm in the right and left hands, respectively. Female sex, low body mass index (BMI), and low body surface area (BSA) were significant predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm. Conclusions: We provided reference DRA diameters for Korean patients. Approximately 50% of the studied patients had DRA diameter < 2.3 mm. Female sex, low BMI, and low BSA remained significant predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm.
Abstract
Background/Aims: While distal radial artery (DRA) access is increasingly being used for diagnostic coronary angiography, limited information is available regarding DRA size. We aimed to determine the DRA reference diameters of Korean patients and identify the predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm. Methods: The outer bilateral DRA diameters were assessed using a linear ultrasound probe in 1,162 consecutive patients who underwent transthoracic echocardiography. The DRA diameter was measured by the perpendicular angle in the dorsum of the hand, and the average values were compared by sex. DRA diameter < 2.3 mm was defined as unsuitable for routine diagnostic coronary angiography using a 5 Fr introducer sheath. Results: The mean DRA diameters were 2.31 ± 0.43 mm (right) and 2.35 ± 0.45 mm (left). The DRA was smaller in women than men (right: 2.15 ± 0.38 mm vs. 2.43 ± 0.44 mm, p < 0.001; left: 2.18 ± 0.39 mm vs. 2.47 ± 0.45 mm, p < 0.001). The DRA diameter was approximately 20% smaller than the radial artery diameter. A total of 630 (54.2%) and 574 (49.4%) patients had DRA diameter < 2.3 mm in the right and left hands, respectively. Female sex, low body mass index (BMI), and low body surface area (BSA) were significant predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm. Conclusions: We provided reference DRA diameters for Korean patients. Approximately 50% of the studied patients had DRA diameter < 2.3 mm. Female sex, low BMI, and low BSA remained significant predictors of DRA diameter < 2.3 mm.
참고문헌 (19)
- Valgimigli M, "Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management : a randomised multicentre trial", Lancet, 385, pp.2465~2476 (2015)
- Ibanez B, "2017 ESC guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation : the task force for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation of the European Society of Cardiology(ESC)", Eur Heart J, 39, pp.119~177 (2018)
- Neumann FJ, "2018 ESC", EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization, 2019, pp.40, 87~165
- Kiemeneij F, "Left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox for coronary angiography(ldTRA)and interventions(ldTRI)", EuroIntervention, 13, pp.851~857 (2017)
- Lee JW, "Real-world experience of the left distal transradial approach for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a prospective observational study(LeDRA)", EuroIntervention, 14, pp.e995~e1003 (2018)
- 김용철, "Feasibility of Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Left Snuffbox Approach", Korean Circulation Journal, 48(12), pp.1120~1130 (2018), 대한심장학회
- Mosteller RD, "Simplified calculation of body-surface area", N Engl J Med, 317, pp.1098~ (1987)
- Mizuguchi Y, "Efficacy and safety of the distal transradial approach in coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention : a Japanese multicenter experience", Cardiovasc Interv Ther, 35, pp.162~167 (2020)
- Norimatsu K, "Importance of measurement of the diameter of the distal radial artery in a distal radial approach from the anatomical snuffbox before coronary catheterization", Heart Vessels, 34, pp.1615~1620 (2019)
- Naito T, "Evaluation of the diameter of the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox using ultrasound in Japanese patients", Cardiovasc Interv Ther, 34, pp.312~316 (2019)
- Valsecchi O, "Early clinical experience with right and left distal transradial access in the anatomical snuffbox in 52 consecutive patients", J Invasive Cardiol, 30, pp.218~223 (2018)
- Sgueglia GA, "Anatomic basis and physiological rationale of distal radial artery access for percutaneous coronary and endovascular procedures", JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 11, pp.2113~2119 (2018)
- Hadjivassiliou A, "Ultrasound-guided access to the distal radial artery at the anatomical snuffbox for catheter-based vascular interventions : a technical guide", EuroIntervention, 16, pp.1342~1348 (2021)
- Dharma S, "Radial artery diameter does not correlate with body mass index : a duplex ultrasound analysis of 1706 patients undergoing trans-radial catheterization at three experienced radial centers", Int J Cardiol, 228, pp.169~172 (2017)
- Lee L, "Clinical determinants of radial artery caliber assessed at the time of transradial cardiac catheterization using routine prospective radiobrachial angiography", Cardiovasc Revasc Med, 19, pp.939~943 (2018)
- Lang RM, "Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults : an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging", J Am Soc Echocardiogr, 28, pp.1~39 (2015)
- Nishimura RA, "2014 AHA", ACC guideline for the management of patients with valvular heart disease : a report of the American College of Cardiology, J Am Coll Cardiol, pp.2014, 63[DOI]
- Baumgartner H, "2017 ESC", EACTS guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease, 2017, pp.38, 2739~2791
- Bernat I, "Best practices for the prevention of radial artery occlusion after transradial diagnostic angiography and intervention : an international consensus paper", JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 12, pp.2235~2246 (2019)