본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

전자식 압력 통각계의 유용성

Usefulness of Electronic Pressure Algometer in Evaluation of Pressure Pain Threshold in Normal Korean Adults

2

조회

0

다운로드

6

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective: To examine pressure pain threshold (PPT) on several skeletal muscles in upper extremity, trunk, and lower extremity by using electronic pressure algometer and to evaluate it's interrater reliability, reproducibility, difference between gender and dominance, correlation with body mass index, and comparison among each muscles.Method: Forty healthy adults (male 27, female 13) were examined by two raters and reexamined in the same order after a rest of 10 minute. PPT at the splenius capitis, upper trapezius, infraspinatus, lumbar paraspinal muscle, extensor carpi radialis, vastus medialis, and gluteus medius muscles of both side was measured by medical electronic algometer. Rate of force application was approximately 2 lb/sec. Body mass index (BMI) was estimated from the individual's body weight by the square of their height.Results: There were no statistical differences of PPTs at all muscles between two raters, between two test with time interval, and between dominant and nondominant side, respectively. PPT in man was higher than female at all muscles. There was significant correlation between BMI and PPT at lumbar paraspinal muscle, vastus medialis, and gluteus medius only in male. PPT was highest at lumbar paraspinal muscle and lowest at splenius capitis.Conclusion: Electronic pressure algometer is a reliable tool for evaluation of PPT which has high interrater reliability and high reproducibility and is not affected by dominance and location of muscles. Therefore, it is a useful clinical tool to compare PPT before and after treatment and to study the mechanism of musculoskeletal pain research program.

Abstract

Objective: To examine pressure pain threshold (PPT) on several skeletal muscles in upper extremity, trunk, and lower extremity by using electronic pressure algometer and to evaluate it's interrater reliability, reproducibility, difference between gender and dominance, correlation with body mass index, and comparison among each muscles.Method: Forty healthy adults (male 27, female 13) were examined by two raters and reexamined in the same order after a rest of 10 minute. PPT at the splenius capitis, upper trapezius, infraspinatus, lumbar paraspinal muscle, extensor carpi radialis, vastus medialis, and gluteus medius muscles of both side was measured by medical electronic algometer. Rate of force application was approximately 2 lb/sec. Body mass index (BMI) was estimated from the individual's body weight by the square of their height.Results: There were no statistical differences of PPTs at all muscles between two raters, between two test with time interval, and between dominant and nondominant side, respectively. PPT in man was higher than female at all muscles. There was significant correlation between BMI and PPT at lumbar paraspinal muscle, vastus medialis, and gluteus medius only in male. PPT was highest at lumbar paraspinal muscle and lowest at splenius capitis.Conclusion: Electronic pressure algometer is a reliable tool for evaluation of PPT which has high interrater reliability and high reproducibility and is not affected by dominance and location of muscles. Therefore, it is a useful clinical tool to compare PPT before and after treatment and to study the mechanism of musculoskeletal pain research program.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. Buchanan HM, "Evaluation of pain threshold using a simple pressure algometer", Clin Rheumatol, 6, pp.510~517 (1987)
  2. Hogeweg JA, "Algometry: measuring pain threshold, method and characteristics in healthy subject", Scand J Rehabil Med, 24, pp.99~103 (1992)
  3. Fischer AA, "Pressure threshold meter: its use for quantification of tender spots", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 67, pp.836~838 (1986)
  4. Vatine JJ, "Electronic pressure algometry of deep pain in healthy volunteers", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, pp.526~530 (1993)
  5. Harden RN, "A Critical analysis of the tender points in fibromyalgia", Pain Med, 8, pp.147~156 (2007)
  6. Chesterton LS, "Gender differences in pressure pain threshold in healthy humans", Pain, 101, pp.259~266 (2003)
  7. Pauli P, "Pressure pain thresholds asymmetry in left and right-handers: associateion with behavilral measures of cerebral laterality", Eur J Pain, 3, pp.151~156 (1999)
  8. Reeves JL, "Reliability of the pressure algometer as a measure of myofascial trigger point sensitivity", Pain, 24, pp.313~321 (1986)
  9. Neri M, "Aging and right-left asymmetry in experimental pain measurement", Pain, 19, pp.43~48 (1984)
  10. Fischer AA, "Pressure algometry over normal muscles. Standard values, validity and reproducibility of pressure threshold", Pain, 30, pp.115~126 (1987)
  11. Han TR, "Pain threshold using a pressure algometer in normal Korean young adults", J Korean Acad Rehabil Med, 18, pp.219~226 (1994)
  12. Delaney GA, "Inter- and intra-rater reliability of the pressure threshold meter in measurement of myofascial trigger piont sensitivity", Am J Phy Med Rehabil, 72, pp.136~139 (1993)
  13. Nussbaum EL, "Reliability of clinical pressure-pain algometric measurements obtained on consecutive days", Phys Ther, 78, pp.160~169 (1998)
  14. Potter L, "Algometer reliability in measuring pain pressure threshold over normal spinal muscles to allow quantification of anti-nociceptive treatment effects", Int J Osteopath Med, 9, pp.113~119 (2006)
  15. Riley JL 3rd, "Sex differences in the perception of noxious experimental stimuli: a meta-analysis", Pain, 74, pp.181~187 (1998)
  16. Neumann L, "A cross-sectional study of the relationship between body mass index and clinical characteristics, tenderness measures, quality of life, and physical functioning in fibromyalgia patients", Clin Rheumatol, 12, pp.1543~1547 (2008)
  17. Jensen K, "Pressure-pain threshold in human temporal region. Evaluation of a new pressure algometer", Pain, 25, pp.313~323 (1986)
  18. Jensen R, "Cephalic muscle tenderness and pressure pain threshold in a general population", Pain, 48, pp.197~203 (1992)
  19. Brennum J, "Measurements of human pressure-pain thresholds on fingers and toes", Pain, 38, pp.211~217 (1989)

관련 논문AI추천

휴대용 디지털 압통기의 측정자내 신뢰도 및 측정자간 신뢰도 측정권오윤, 박규남, 박호동, 송미혜, 오재섭, 이경종, 이원휘한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2008 · 제15권 제3호Reliability and Usefulness of the Pressure Pain Th reshold Measurement in Patients with Myofascial Pain김미정, 박시복, 장성호, Chan Woo Kim, Giburm Park대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2011 · 제35권 제3호근전도를 이용한 Sorensen 검사시 성인남녀등 근육의 근피로도 분석김태영, 이미선한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지1998 · 제5권 제3호만성 요통 환자와 요통이 없는 건강한 대상자의 척추 뼈분절의 압통 역치 수준 비교와 만성 요통 환자에 통증 수준, 기능장애 및 심리사회적 수준 간에 상관성김선엽, 유진영대한정형도수물리치료학회 · 대한정형도수물리치료학회지2023 · 제29권 제3호요통 환자를 대상으로 후중둔근 도수근력검사의 일치도 및 휴대용 근력계 측정 방법의 신뢰도 검사김수정, 김현숙, 박규남, 이원휘, 최흥식, 하성민한국전문물리치료학회 · 한국전문물리치료학회지2011 · 제18권 제3호만성 긴장성 두통 환자와 정상 대조군의 압력통각 역치 변화에 대한 비교연구강위창, 김민정, 홍권의대한약침학회 · Journal of Pharmacopuncture2009 · 제12권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (16건)