Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To compare the low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with high frequency (20 Hz) rTMS on motor functional improvement of the affected upper extremity in subacute stroke patients.Methods Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke participated in this study. The first group received 10 sessions of 20 Hz rTMS at ipsilesional M1 area and the other group received 10 sessions of 1 Hz rTMS at contralesional M1 area. Motor training of the hemiparetic hand was conducted after each rTMS train. All the patients received conventional occupational therapy immediately after each rTMS session. Manual function test (MFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (FMS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Brunnstrom recovery stage, and grip strength were used to assess motor function before, at the end of, and one month after the last session of rTMS.Results No adverse side effects were reported during the course of the experiment using rTMS. No significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity was observed between the two groups before rTMS. Significant improvements in MFT, FMS, MBI, and Brunnstrom stage were observed in the both groups at the end of the last rTMS session and one month later (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups (p>0.05)Conclusion There was no significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity between 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS during the subacute period of ischemic stroke. Thus, we cannot conclude which has a greater effect.
Abstract
Objective To compare the low frequency (1 Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) with high frequency (20 Hz) rTMS on motor functional improvement of the affected upper extremity in subacute stroke patients.Methods Forty patients with subacute ischemic stroke participated in this study. The first group received 10 sessions of 20 Hz rTMS at ipsilesional M1 area and the other group received 10 sessions of 1 Hz rTMS at contralesional M1 area. Motor training of the hemiparetic hand was conducted after each rTMS train. All the patients received conventional occupational therapy immediately after each rTMS session. Manual function test (MFT), Fugl-Meyer Assessment scale (FMS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), Brunnstrom recovery stage, and grip strength were used to assess motor function before, at the end of, and one month after the last session of rTMS.Results No adverse side effects were reported during the course of the experiment using rTMS. No significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity was observed between the two groups before rTMS. Significant improvements in MFT, FMS, MBI, and Brunnstrom stage were observed in the both groups at the end of the last rTMS session and one month later (p<0.05). No significant difference was found between the two groups (p>0.05)Conclusion There was no significant difference in motor function of the affected upper extremity between 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS during the subacute period of ischemic stroke. Thus, we cannot conclude which has a greater effect.
참고문헌 (30)
- Turhan N, "Impact of stroke etiology, lesion location and aging on post-stroke urinary incontinence as a predictor of functional recovery", Int J Rehabil Res, 29, pp.335~338 (2006)
- Jongbloed L, "Prediction of function after stroke: a critical review", Stroke, 17, pp.765~776 (1986)
- Keren O, "Upper limb somatosensory evoked potentials as a predictor of rehabilitation progress in dominant hemisphere stroke subjects", Stroke, 24, pp.1789~1793 (1993)
- 김덕용, "만성 뇌졸중 후 편마비 환자에서 2주간 경두개 전기 자극 후 상지 운동기능 향상", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 33(1), pp.5~11 (2009), 대한재활의학회
- Alonso-Alonso M, "Brain stimulation in poststroke rehabilitation", Cerebrovasc Dis, 24(Suppl 1), pp.157~166 (2007)
- Mansur CG, "A sham stimulation-controlled trial of rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients", Neurology, 64, pp.1802~1804 (2005)
- Khedr EM, "Therapeutic trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation after acute ischemic stroke", Neurology, 65, pp.466~468 (2005)
- Kwakkel G, "Understanding the pattern of functional recovery after stroke: facts and theories", Restor Neurol Neurosci, 22, pp.281~299 (2004)
- Fregni F, "A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients", Stroke, 37, pp.2115~2122 (2006)
- Peinemann A, "Long-lasting increase in corticospinal excitability after 1800 pulses of subthreshold 5 Hz repetitive TMS to the primary motor cortex", Clin Neurophysiol, 115, pp.1519~1526 (2004)
- Fitzgerald PB, "A comprehensive review of the effects of rTMS on motor cortical excitability and inhibition", Clin Neurophysiol, 117, pp.2584~2596 (2006)
- Kim YH, "Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulationinduced corticomotor excitability and associated motor skill acquisition in chronic stroke", Stroke, 37, pp.1471~1476 (2006)
- Kirton A, "Contralesional repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for chronic hemiparesis in subcortical paediatric stroke: a randomised trial", Lancet Neurol, 7, pp.507~513 (2008)
- Counsell C, "Predicting outcome after acute and subacute stroke: development and validation of new prognostic models", Stroke, 33, pp.1041~1047 (2002)
- Cramer SC, "Repairing the human brain after stroke. II. Restorative therapies", Ann Neurol, 63, pp.549~560 (2008)
- Munoz Maniega S, "Changes in NAA and lactate following ischemic stroke: a serial MR spectroscopic imaging study", Neurology, 71, pp.1993~1999 (2008)
- Wassermann EM, "Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996", Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 108, pp.1~16 (1998)
- Miyamoto S, "Reliability and validity of the Manual Function Test in patients with stroke", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 88, pp.247~255 (2009)
- Fugl-Meyer AR, "The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance", Scand J Rehabil Med, 7, pp.13~31 (1975)
- Wade DT, "Predicting Barthel ADL score at 6 months after an acute stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 64, pp.24~28 (1983)
- Safaz I, "Brunnstrom recovery stage and motricity index for the evaluation of upper extremity in stroke: analysis for correlation and responsiveness", Int J Rehabil Res, 32, pp.228~231 (2009)
- Mathiowetz V, "Grip and pinch strength: normative data for adults", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 66, pp.69~74 (1985)
- Hummel FC, "Non-invasive brain stimulation:a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?", Lancet Neurol, 5, pp.708~712 (2006)
- Vang C, "Correlation between functional and electrophysiological recovery in acute ischemic stroke", Stroke, 30, pp.2126~2130 (1999)
- Yozbatiran N, "Safety and behavioral effects of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in stroke", Stroke, 40, pp.309~312 (2009)
- Valle AC, "Low and high frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for the treatment of spasticity", Dev Med Child Neurol, 49, pp.534~538 (2007)
- Chang WH, "Long-term effects of rTMS on motor recovery in patients after subacute stroke", J Rehabil Med, 42, pp.758~764 (2010)
- Gershon AA, "Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression", Am J Psychiatry, 160, pp.835~845 (2003)
- Khedr EM, "Long-term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischemic stroke", Acta Neurol Scand, 121, pp.30~37 (2010)
- Sasaki N, "Comparison of the effects of high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper limb hemiparesis in the early phase of stroke", J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis, 22, pp.413~418 (2013)