본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

The Persisted Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Augment Task-Specific Induced Hand Recovery Following Subacute Stroke: Extended Study

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective To examine the long-term effects of the low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LFrTMS) combined with task-specific training on paretic hand function following subacute stroke. Methods Sixteen participants were randomly selected and grouped into two: the experimental group (real LFrTMS) and the control group (sham LF-rTMS). All the 16 participants were then taken through a 1-hour taskspecific training of the paretic hand. The corticospinal excitability (motor evoke potential [MEP] amplitude) of the non-lesioned hemisphere, and the paretic hand performance (Wolf Motor Function Test total movement time [WMFT-TMT]) were evaluated at baseline, after the LF-rTMS, immediately after task-specific training, 1 and 2 weeks after the training. Results Groups comparisons showed a significant difference in the MEP after LF-rTMS and after the training. Compared to the baseline, the MEP of the experimental group significantly decreased after LF-rTMS and after the training and that effect was maintained for 2 weeks. Group comparisons showed significant difference in WMFT-TMT after the training. Only in the experimental group, the WMFT-TMT of the can lifting item significantly reduced compared to the baseline and the effect was sustained for 2 weeks. Conclusion The results of this study established that the improvement in paretic hand after task-specific training was enhanced by LF-rTMS and it persisted for at least 2 weeks.

Abstract

Objective To examine the long-term effects of the low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LFrTMS) combined with task-specific training on paretic hand function following subacute stroke. Methods Sixteen participants were randomly selected and grouped into two: the experimental group (real LFrTMS) and the control group (sham LF-rTMS). All the 16 participants were then taken through a 1-hour taskspecific training of the paretic hand. The corticospinal excitability (motor evoke potential [MEP] amplitude) of the non-lesioned hemisphere, and the paretic hand performance (Wolf Motor Function Test total movement time [WMFT-TMT]) were evaluated at baseline, after the LF-rTMS, immediately after task-specific training, 1 and 2 weeks after the training. Results Groups comparisons showed a significant difference in the MEP after LF-rTMS and after the training. Compared to the baseline, the MEP of the experimental group significantly decreased after LF-rTMS and after the training and that effect was maintained for 2 weeks. Group comparisons showed significant difference in WMFT-TMT after the training. Only in the experimental group, the WMFT-TMT of the can lifting item significantly reduced compared to the baseline and the effect was sustained for 2 weeks. Conclusion The results of this study established that the improvement in paretic hand after task-specific training was enhanced by LF-rTMS and it persisted for at least 2 weeks.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. "Impact of stroke (stroke statistics)" (2016)[URL]
  2. Thrasher TA, "Rehabilitation of reaching and grasping function in severe hemiplegic patients using functional electrical stimulation therapy", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 22, pp.706~714 (2008)
  3. Harris-Love ML, "Noninvasive cortical stimulation in neurorehabilitation: a review", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 87(12 Suppl 2), pp.S84~93 (2006)
  4. Fregni F, "Hand motor recovery after stroke: tuning the orchestra to improve hand motor function", Cogn Behav Neurol, 19, pp.21~33 (2006)
  5. Shimizu T, "Motor cortical disinhibition in the unaffected hemisphere after unilateral cortical stroke", Brain, 125(Pt 8), pp.1896~1907 (2002)
  6. 박은희, "Interhemispheric Modulation of Dual-Mode, Noninvasive Brain Stimulation on Motor Function", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 38(3), pp.297~303 (2014), 대한재활의학회
  7. Murase N, "Influence of interhemispheric interactions on motor function in chronic stroke", Ann Neurol, 55, pp.400~409 (2004)
  8. Bütefisch CM, "Relationship between interhemispheric inhibition and motor cortex excitability in subacute stroke patients", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 22, pp.4~21 (2008)
  9. Takeuchi N, "Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of contralesional primary motor cortex improves hand function after stroke", Stroke, 36, pp.2681~2686 (2005)
  10. Dafotakis M, "The effects of 1 Hz rTMS over the hand area of M1 on movement kinematics of the ipsilateral hand", J Neural Transm (Vienna), 115, pp.1269~1274 (2008)
  11. Takeuchi N, "Inhibition of the unaffected motor cortex by 1 Hz repetitive transcranical magnetic stimulation enhances motor performance and training effect of the paretic hand in patients with chronic stroke", J Rehabil Med, 40, pp.298~303 (2008)
  12. Takeuchi N, "Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in a patient who was forced to use the affected hand", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 87, pp.74~77 (2008)
  13. Vongvaivanichakul P, "Reach-to-grasp training in individuals with chronic stroke augmented by low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation", Med Assoc Thai, 97(Suppl 7), pp.S45~S49 (2014)
  14. Thanakamchokchai J, "Immediate effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to augment task-specific training in sub-acute stroke", Asia Pac J Sci Technol, 20, pp.105~119 (2015)
  15. Bolognini N, "Using noninvasive brain stimulation to augment motor traininginduced plasticity", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 6, pp.8~ (2009)
  16. Winstein CJ, "Stroke recovery and rehabilitation", pp.267~290 (2009), Demos Medical Publishing
  17. Dobkin BH, "Strategies for stroke rehabilitation", Lancet Neurol, 3, pp.528~536 (2004)
  18. Liepert J., "Motor cortex excitability in stroke before and after constraint-induced movement therapy", Cogn Behav Neurol, 19, pp.41~47 (2006)
  19. Ertelt D, "Action observation has a positive impact on rehabilitation of motor deficits after stroke", Neuroimage, 36(Suppl 2), pp.T164~T173 (2007)
  20. Hummel FC, "Non-invasive brain stimulation:a new strategy to improve neurorehabilitation after stroke?", Lancet Neurol, 5, pp.708~712 (2006)
  21. Tretriluxana J, "Feasibility investigation of the Accelerated Skill Acquisition Program (ASAP): insights into reach-to-grasp coordination of individuals with postacute stroke", Top Stroke Rehabil, 20, pp.151~160 (2013)
  22. Kleim JA, "Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: implications for rehabilitation after brain damage", J Speech Lang Hear Res, 51, pp.S225~S239 (2008)
  23. Conforto AB, "Magnetic stimulation in clinical neurophysiology", pp.143~154 (2005), Elsevier
  24. Wassermann EM, "Risk and safety of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: report and suggested guidelines from the International Workshop on the Safety of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation, June 5-7, 1996", Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol, 108, pp.16~ (1998)
  25. Maeda F, "Transcranial magnetic stimulation: studying motor neurophysiology of psychiatric disorders", Psychopharmacology (Berl), 168, pp.359~376 (2003)
  26. Rose DK, "Does inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation augment functional task practice to improve arm recovery in chronic stroke?", Stroke Res Treat, 2014, pp.305236~ (2014)
  27. Kakuda W, "A multi-center study on low-frequency rTMS combined with intensive occupational therapy for upper limb hemiparesis in post-stroke patients", J Neuroeng Rehabil, 9, pp.4~ (2012)
  28. Chen R, "Depression of motor cortex excitability by low-frequency transcranial magnetic stimulation", Neurology, 48, pp.1398~1403 (1997)
  29. Krakauer JW, "Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation", Curr Opin Neurol, 19, pp.84~90 (2006)
  30. Liepert J, "Motor cortex plasticity during forced-use therapy in stroke patients: a preliminary study", J Neurol, 248, pp.315~321 (2001)
  31. Liepert J, "Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans", Stroke, 31, pp.1210~1216 (2000)
  32. Ziemann U., "TMS induced plasticity in human cortex", Rev Neurosci, 15, pp.253~266 (2004)
  33. Thickbroom GW, "Transcranial magnetic stimulation and synaptic plasticity: experimental framework and human models", Exp Brain Res, 180, pp.583~593 (2007)
  34. Avenanti A, "Low-frequency rTMS promotes use-dependent motor plasticity in chronic stroke: a randomized trial", Neurology, 78, pp.256~264 (2012)
  35. Higgins J, "Combining rTMS and taskoriented training in the rehabilitation of the arm after stroke: a pilot randomized controlled trial", Stroke Res Treat, 2013, pp.539146~ (2013)

관련 논문AI추천

Effects of Hand Training During the Aftereffect Period of Low-Frequency rTMS in Subacute Stroke Patients김상범, 박주원, 박진기, 이경우, 이숙정, 이종화대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2018 · 제42권 제4호Effect of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Post-stroke Patients with Severe Upper-Limb Motor Impairment김덕용, 김주선, 정강재, 홍준택, Hyunjung Kim, Kim Dae Hyun대한뇌신경재활학회 · 뇌신경재활2020 · 제13권 제1호Comparison of the Effects of 1 Hz and 20 Hz rTMS on Motor Recovery in Subacute Stroke Patients김철, 이병주, 최희은, Hee Jin Jung, Ki Hoon Lee, Young-Joon Lim대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2014 · 제38권 제5호Factors Associated With Upper Extremity Motor Recovery After Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Stroke Patients김민아, 김상범, 이경우, 이숙정, 이종화, 최수진대한재활의학회 · Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine2015 · 제39권 제2호반복 경두개 자기자극 후 상지운동이 편마비 상지 기능 회복에 미치는 영향강성진, 류병주, 박시운, 이지연, 최경인, 최은석대한근전도전기진단의학회 · 대한근전도 전기진단의학회지2010 · 제12권 제1호Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Upper and Lower Limb Motor Function and Spasticity After Stroke: A Meta-Analysis류병주, 이후영대한뇌신경재활학회 · 뇌신경재활2025 · 제18권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)