The Validity of the Bayley-III and DDST-II in Preterm Infants With Neurodevelopmental Impairment: A Pilot Study
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To identify the usefulness of both the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition (Bayley-III) and Denver Developmental Screening Test II (DDST-II) in preterm babies with neurodevelopmental impairment, considering the detection rate as regulation of criteria.Methods Retrospective medical chart reviews which included the Bayley-III and DDST-II, were conducted for 69 preterm babies. Detection rate of neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm babies were investigated by modulating scaled score of the Bayley-III. The detection rate of DDST-II was identified by regarding more than 1 caution as an abnormality. Then detection rates of each corrected age group were verified using conventional criteria.Results When applying conventional criteria, 22 infants and 35 infants were detected as preterm babies with neurodevelopmental impairment, as per the Bayley-III and DDST-II evaluation, respectively. Detection rates increased by applying abnormal criteria that specified as less than 11 points in the Bayley-III scaled score. In DDST-II, detection rates rose from 50% to 68.6% using modified criteria. The detection rates were highest when performed after 12 months corrected age, being 100% in DDST II. The detection rate also increased when applying the modified criteria in both the Bayley-III and DDST-II.Conclusion Accurate neurologic examination is more important for detection of preterm babies with neurodevelopmental impairment. We suggest further studies for the accurate modification of the detection criteria in DDST-II and the Bayley-III for preterm babies.
Abstract
Objective To identify the usefulness of both the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd edition (Bayley-III) and Denver Developmental Screening Test II (DDST-II) in preterm babies with neurodevelopmental impairment, considering the detection rate as regulation of criteria.Methods Retrospective medical chart reviews which included the Bayley-III and DDST-II, were conducted for 69 preterm babies. Detection rate of neurodevelopmental impairment in preterm babies were investigated by modulating scaled score of the Bayley-III. The detection rate of DDST-II was identified by regarding more than 1 caution as an abnormality. Then detection rates of each corrected age group were verified using conventional criteria.Results When applying conventional criteria, 22 infants and 35 infants were detected as preterm babies with neurodevelopmental impairment, as per the Bayley-III and DDST-II evaluation, respectively. Detection rates increased by applying abnormal criteria that specified as less than 11 points in the Bayley-III scaled score. In DDST-II, detection rates rose from 50% to 68.6% using modified criteria. The detection rates were highest when performed after 12 months corrected age, being 100% in DDST II. The detection rate also increased when applying the modified criteria in both the Bayley-III and DDST-II.Conclusion Accurate neurologic examination is more important for detection of preterm babies with neurodevelopmental impairment. We suggest further studies for the accurate modification of the detection criteria in DDST-II and the Bayley-III for preterm babies.
참고문헌 (18)
- Stoll BJ, "Nelson textbook of pediatrics", pp.671~675 (2007), Saunders
- VOHR, B, "Follow-up care of high-risk infants", Pediatrics, 114, pp.2~ (2004)
- de Vries LS, "Imaging the premature brain: ultrasound or MRI?", Neuroradiology, 55(Suppl 2), pp.13~22 (2013)
- Galascoe FP, "Nelson textbook of pediatrics", pp.74~81 (2007), Saunders
- Spittle AJ, "Early developmental intervention programs post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 18, pp.CD005495~ (2007)
- Spittle AJ, "Improving the outcome of infants born at <30 weeks’ gestation-a randomized controlled trial of preventative care at home", BMC Pediatr, 9, pp.73~ (2009)
- Doyle LW, "Evaluation of neonatal intensive care for extremely low birth weight infants in Victoria over two decades. I. Effectiveness", Pediatrics, 113, pp.505~509 (2004)
- 권유진, "Validity of the Ages and Stages Questionnaires in Korean Compared to Bayley Scales of Infant Development-II for Screening Preterm Infants at Corrected Age of 18-24 Months for Neurodevelopmental Delay", Journal of Korean Medical Science, 30(4), pp.450~455 (2015), 대한의학회
- 김진경, "발달 지연아에서 K-ASQ(Korean-Ages & Stages Quest ionnaires) 발달 선별 검사와 베일리 영유아 발달 검사의 비교", 대한소아신경학회지, 18(1), pp.49~57 (2010), 대한소아신경학회
- Vohr BR, "Neuropsychological and functional outcomes of very low birth weight infants", Semin Perinatol, 21, pp.202~220 (1997)
- Anderson PJ, "Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale", Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 164, pp.352~356 (2010)
- Hyo-yun Ga, "A Comparison of the Korean-Ages and Stages Questionnaires and Denver Developmental Delay Screening Test", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 35(3), pp.369~374 (2011), 대한재활의학회
- 이지현, "Reliability and Applicability of the Bayley Scale of Infant Development-II for Children With Cerebral Palsy", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37(2), pp.167~174 (2013), 대한재활의학회
- Lee K, "Denver II Developmental Screening Test and development of Seoul children", Korean J Pediatr, 39, pp.1210~1215 (1996)
- Jeon MC, "Accuracy of Denver II in developmental delay screening", J Korean Child Neurol Soc, 5, pp.111~118 (1997)
- Boyle CA, "Prevalence and health impact of developmental disabilities in US children", Pediatrics, 93, pp.399~403 (1994)
- Reuner G, "Comparison of the developmental tests Bayley-III and Bayley-II in 7-month-old infants born preterm", Eur J Pediatr, 172, pp.393~400 (2013)
- Acton BV, "Overestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-III after early complex cardiac surgery", Pediatrics, 128, pp.e794~800 (2011)