A Comparison of the Korean-Ages and Stages Questionnaires and Denver Developmental Delay Screening Test
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To evaluate concurrent validity between the Korean-Ages and Stages Questionnaires (K-ASQ) and the Denver Developmental Screening Test II (DDST II), and to evaluate the validity of the K-ASQ as a screening tool for detecting developmental delay of Korean children. Method A retrospective chart review was done to examine concurrent validity of the screening potentials for developmental delay between the K-ASQ and the DDST II (n=226). We examined validity of the K-ASQ compared with Capute scale (n=141) and Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) (n=69) as a gold standard of developmental delay. Correlation analysis was used to determine the strength of the associations between tests. Results A fair to good strength relationship (k=0.442, p<0.05) was found between the K-ASQ and the DDST II. The test characteristics of the K-ASQ were sensitivity 76.3-90.2%, specifi city 62.5-76.5%, positive likelihood ratio (PLR)2.41-3.40, and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) 0.16-0.32. Conclusion Evidence of concurrent validity of the K-ASQ with DDST II was found. K-ASQ can be used for screening of developmental delay.
Abstract
Objective To evaluate concurrent validity between the Korean-Ages and Stages Questionnaires (K-ASQ) and the Denver Developmental Screening Test II (DDST II), and to evaluate the validity of the K-ASQ as a screening tool for detecting developmental delay of Korean children. Method A retrospective chart review was done to examine concurrent validity of the screening potentials for developmental delay between the K-ASQ and the DDST II (n=226). We examined validity of the K-ASQ compared with Capute scale (n=141) and Alberta Infant Motor Scale (AIMS) (n=69) as a gold standard of developmental delay. Correlation analysis was used to determine the strength of the associations between tests. Results A fair to good strength relationship (k=0.442, p<0.05) was found between the K-ASQ and the DDST II. The test characteristics of the K-ASQ were sensitivity 76.3-90.2%, specifi city 62.5-76.5%, positive likelihood ratio (PLR)2.41-3.40, and negative likelihood ratio (NLR) 0.16-0.32. Conclusion Evidence of concurrent validity of the K-ASQ with DDST II was found. K-ASQ can be used for screening of developmental delay.
참고문헌 (27)
- "Korean Society of Pediatric Rehabilitation and Developmental Medicine, In Pediatric rehabilitation", pp.42~62 (2006), Koonja
- Spittle AJ, "Early developmental intervention programs post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairments in preterm infants", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 18, pp.CD005495~ (2007)
- Spittle AJ, "Improving the outcome of infants born at <30 weeks’ gestation-a randomized controlled trial of preventative care at home", BMC Pediatr, 9, pp.73~ (2009)
- Glascoe FP, "Accuracy of the Denver-II in developmental screening", Pediatrics, 89, pp.1221~1225 (1992)
- Lee K, "Denver II developmental screening test and development of Seoul children", J Korean Pediatr Soc, 39, pp.1210~1215 (1997)
- Jeon MC, "Accuracy of Denver II in developmental delay screening", J Korean Child Neurol Soc, 5, pp.111~118 (1997)
- Frankenburg WK, "The Denver II: a major revision and res tan dardization of the Denver Developmental Screening Test", Pediatrics, 89, pp.91~97 (1992)
- Squires J, "Revision of a parentcompleted development screening tool: Ages and Stages Questionnaires", J Pediatr Psychol, 22, pp.313~328 (1997)
- Heo KH, "K-ASQ (Ages and Stages Questionnaires): a parent-completed childmonitoring system", pp.1~89 (2006), Seoul Community Rehabilitation Center
- 김진경, "발달 지연아에서 K-ASQ(Korean-Ages & Stages Quest ionnaires) 발달 선별 검사와 베일리 영유아 발달 검사의 비교", 대한소아신경학회지, 18(1), pp.49~57 (2010), 대한소아신경학회
- 김은영, "The ages and stages questionnaire: screening fordevelopmental delay in the setting of a pediatric outpatient clinic", Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 50(11), pp.1061~1066 (2007), 대한소아과학회
- Clinical Linguistic & Auditory Milestone Scale (CAT, "The Capute scales: Cognitive Adaptive Test", pp.Paul H Brookes Pub Co, CLAMS)
- Piper M, "Motor assessment of the developing infant", pp.25~49 (1994), W. B. Saunders Co
- Sin HS, "Korean Denver II test guide", pp.9~63 (2002), Hyunmoon
- Kim MS, "Interrater reliability of Alberta Infant Motor Scale", Journal of Korean Society for Neurotherapy, 14, pp.23~34 (2009)
- Boyle CA, "Prevalence and health impact of developmental disabilities in US children", Pediatrics, 93, pp.399~403 (1994)
- 권범선, "뇌실주위 백질연화증의 뇌자기공명영상 소견과 Denver II 및 Capute 발달검사", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 26(3), pp.6~278 (2002), 대한재활의학회
- Kim HS, "Developmental delay of language in cerebral palsy children", J Korean Acad Rehab Med, 22, pp.1198~1205 (1998)
- Kim HS, "Comparison of the fi ndings of DDST (II), brain SPECT and brain MRI in cerebral palsy children", J Korean Acad Rehab Med, 22, pp.1021~1027 (1998)
- 권정이, "말 장애 및 언어 발달 지연을 주소로 내원한 아동들의 진단", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 30(4), pp.309~314 (2006), 대한재활의학회
- 강진영, "뇌성마비 아동에서의 사회성과 손 기능에 대한 통합미술치료 효과", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 30(4), pp.328~332 (2006), 대한재활의학회
- Deeks JJ, "Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios", BMJ, 329, pp.168~169 (2004)
- Wachtel RC, "CAT", CLAMS. A tool for the pediatric evaluation of infants and young children with developmental delay. Clinical Adaptive Test, Clinical Pediatrics, pp.1994, 33[DOI]
- Santos RS, "Early diagnosis of abnormal development of preterm newborns: assessment instruments", J Pediatr, 84, pp.289~299 (2008)
- Bartlett DJ, "Use of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale to characterize the motor development of infants born preterm at eight months corrected age", Phys Occup Th er Pediatr, 23, pp.31~45 (2003)
- Darrah J, "Assessment of gross motor skills of at-risk infants: predictive validity of the Alberta Infant Motor Scale", Dev Med Child Neurol, 40, pp.485~491 (1998)
- Marks K, "Lowring developmental screening thresholds and raising quality improvement for preterm children", Pediatrics, 123, pp.1516~1523 (2009)