Comparison of Second and Third Editions of the Bayley Scales in Children With Suspected Developmental Delay
2
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To compare the scores of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development second edition (BSID-II) and the third edition, Bayley-III, in children with suspected developmental delay and to determine the cutoff score for developmental delay in the Bayley-III. Methods Children younger than 42 months (n=62) with suspected developmental delay who visited our department between 2014 and 2015 were assessed with both the BSID-II and Bayley-III tests. Results The mean Bayley-III Cognitive Language Composite (CLC) score was 5.8 points higher than the mean BSID-II Mental Developmental Index (MDI) score, and the mean Bayley-III Motor Composite (MC) score was 7.9 points higher than the mean BSID-II Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) score. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of a BSID-II MDI score <70, Bayley-III CLC scores showed a cutoff of 78.0 (96.6% sensitivity and 93.9% specificity). In ROC analysis of a BSID-II PDI score <70, the Bayley-III MC score showed a cutoff of 80. Conclusion There was a strong correlation between the BSID-II and Bayley-III in children with suspected developmental delay. The Bayley-III identified fewer children with developmental delay. The recommended cutoff value for developmental delay increased from a BSID-II score of 70 to a Bayley-III CLC score of 78 and Bayley-III MC score of 80.
Abstract
Objective To compare the scores of the Bayley Scales of Infant Development second edition (BSID-II) and the third edition, Bayley-III, in children with suspected developmental delay and to determine the cutoff score for developmental delay in the Bayley-III. Methods Children younger than 42 months (n=62) with suspected developmental delay who visited our department between 2014 and 2015 were assessed with both the BSID-II and Bayley-III tests. Results The mean Bayley-III Cognitive Language Composite (CLC) score was 5.8 points higher than the mean BSID-II Mental Developmental Index (MDI) score, and the mean Bayley-III Motor Composite (MC) score was 7.9 points higher than the mean BSID-II Psychomotor Developmental Index (PDI) score. In receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of a BSID-II MDI score <70, Bayley-III CLC scores showed a cutoff of 78.0 (96.6% sensitivity and 93.9% specificity). In ROC analysis of a BSID-II PDI score <70, the Bayley-III MC score showed a cutoff of 80. Conclusion There was a strong correlation between the BSID-II and Bayley-III in children with suspected developmental delay. The Bayley-III identified fewer children with developmental delay. The recommended cutoff value for developmental delay increased from a BSID-II score of 70 to a Bayley-III CLC score of 78 and Bayley-III MC score of 80.
참고문헌 (15)
- Lindsey JC, "Intrapolation and extrapolation of age-equivalent scores for the Bayley II: a comparison of two methods of estimation", Clin Neuropharmacol, 22, pp.44~53 (1999)[DOI]
- Johnson S, "Developmental screen or developmental testing?", Early Hum Dev, 82, pp.173~183 (2006)[DOI]
- Acton BV, "Overestimating neurodevelopment using the Bayley-III after early complex cardiac surgery", Pediatrics, 128, pp.e794~e800 (2011)[DOI]
- Anderson PJ, "Underestimation of developmental delay by the new Bayley-III Scale", Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 164, pp.352~356 (2010)[DOI]
- Bayley N, "Bayley scales of infant and toddler development. 3rd ed" (2006), Pearson
- Hilden J, "The area under the ROC curve and its competitors", Med Decis Making, 11, pp.95~101 (1991)[DOI]
- Vohr BR, "Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes", J Pediatr, 161, pp.222~228 (2012)[DOI]
- Reuner G, "Comparison of the developmental tests Bayley-III and Bayley-II in 7-month-old infants born preterm", Eur J Pediatr, 172, pp.393~400 (2013)[DOI]
- Moore T, "Relationship between test scores using the second and third editions of the Bayley Scales in extremely preterm children", J Pediatr, 160, pp.553~558 (2012)[DOI]
- Silveira RC, "Agreement between Bayley Scales second and third edition assessments of very low-birthweight infants", Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med, 166, pp.1075~1076 (2012)[DOI]
- Jary S, "Comparison of Bayley-2 and Bayley-3 scores at 18 months in term infants following neonatal encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia", Dev Med Child Neurol, 55, pp.1053~1059 (2013)[DOI]
- Trahan LH, "The Flynn effect: a meta-analysis", Psychol Bull, 140, pp.1332~1360 (2014)[DOI]
- Lowe JR, "Comparison of the Bayley II Mental Developmental Index and the Bayley III Cognitive Scale: are we measuring the same thing?", Acta Paediatr, 101, pp.e55~e58 (2012)[DOI]
- Bode MM, "Predictive validity of the Bayley, Third Edition at 2 years for intelligence quotient at 4 years in preterm infants", J Dev Behav Pediatr, 35, pp.570~575 (2014)[DOI]
- Hajian-Tilaki K, "Sample size estimation in diagnostic test studies of biomedical informatics", J Biomed Inform, 48, pp.193~204 (2014)[DOI]