Parents' Perspectives and Clinical Effectiveness of Cranial-Molding Orthoses in Infants With Plagiocephaly
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of and parents’ perspectives on cranial-molding orthotic treatment.Methods Medical charts were reviewed for 82 infants treated for plagiocephaly with cranial-molding orthoses in our clinic from April 2012 to July 2016 retrospectively. Infants who were clinically diagnosed with positional plagiocephaly and had a Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAI) of more than 3.5% were included. Pre- and post-treatment CVAI was obtained by three-dimensional head-surface laser scan. Parents’ perceptions of good outcome (satisfaction) were evaluated with the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The GAS score assessed how much the parent felt that his or her initial goal for correcting the skull asymmetry was achieved after the treatment. Results The compliance with cranial-molding orthoses was 90.2% (74 of 82 infants). There were 53 infants (65% of the 82 infants) who had adverse events with the cranial-molding orthoses during the study. Heat rash was found in 29 cases (35.4%) and was the most common adverse event. The mean GAS T-score was 51.9±10.2. A GAS T-score of 0 or more was identified for 71.6% of parents. The GAS T-score was significantly related to the age (p<0.001), the initial CVAI, and the difference of CVAI during the treatment (p<0.001). Conclusion Parents’ perception of good outcome was correlated with the anthropometric improvement in cranial-molding orthotic treatment in infants with plagiocephaly. A high percentage of parents felt that the treatment met their initial goals in spite of a high occurrence of adverse events.
Abstract
Objective To investigate the clinical effectiveness of and parents’ perspectives on cranial-molding orthotic treatment.Methods Medical charts were reviewed for 82 infants treated for plagiocephaly with cranial-molding orthoses in our clinic from April 2012 to July 2016 retrospectively. Infants who were clinically diagnosed with positional plagiocephaly and had a Cranial Vault Asymmetry Index (CVAI) of more than 3.5% were included. Pre- and post-treatment CVAI was obtained by three-dimensional head-surface laser scan. Parents’ perceptions of good outcome (satisfaction) were evaluated with the Goal Attainment Scale (GAS). The GAS score assessed how much the parent felt that his or her initial goal for correcting the skull asymmetry was achieved after the treatment. Results The compliance with cranial-molding orthoses was 90.2% (74 of 82 infants). There were 53 infants (65% of the 82 infants) who had adverse events with the cranial-molding orthoses during the study. Heat rash was found in 29 cases (35.4%) and was the most common adverse event. The mean GAS T-score was 51.9±10.2. A GAS T-score of 0 or more was identified for 71.6% of parents. The GAS T-score was significantly related to the age (p<0.001), the initial CVAI, and the difference of CVAI during the treatment (p<0.001). Conclusion Parents’ perception of good outcome was correlated with the anthropometric improvement in cranial-molding orthotic treatment in infants with plagiocephaly. A high percentage of parents felt that the treatment met their initial goals in spite of a high occurrence of adverse events.
참고문헌 (28)
- Ellenbogen RG, "Update on craniofacial surgery: the differential diagnosis of lambdoid synostosis", posterior plagiocephaly, 2000, pp.47, 303~318
- Mortenson P, "Deformational plagiocephaly and orthotic treatment: indications and limitations", Childs Nerv Syst, 28, pp.1407~1412 (2012)[DOI]
- Looman WS, "Evidence-based care of the child with deformational plagiocephaly, Part I: assessment and diagnosis", J Pediatr Health Care, 26, pp.242~250 (2012)[DOI]
- Hutchison BL, "Plagiocephaly and brachycephaly in the first two years of life: a prospective cohort study", Pediatrics, 114, pp.970~980 (2004)[DOI]
- Collett B, "Neurodevelopmental implications of deformational plagiocephaly", J Dev Behav Pediatr, 26, pp.379~389 (2005)[DOI]
- Boere-Boonekamp MM, "Positional preference: prevalence in infants and follow- up after two years", Pediatrics, 107, pp.339~343 (2001)[DOI]
- Robinson S, "Diagnosis and management of deformational plagiocephaly", J Neurosurg Pediatr, 3, pp.284~295 (2009)
- Tamber MS, "Congress of neurological surgeons systematic review and evidence-based guideline on the role of cranial molding orthosis (Helmet) therapy for patients with positional plagiocephaly", Neurosurgery, 79, pp.E632~E633 (2016)[DOI]
- van Wijk RM, "Helmet therapy in infants with positional skull deformation: randomised controlled trial", BMJ, 348, pp.g2741~ (2014)[DOI]
- Mulliken JB, "Analysis of posterior plagiocephaly: deformational versus synostotic", Plast Reconstr Surg, 103, pp.371~380 (1999)[DOI]
- Stadnick NA, "Parent perspectives of an evidence-based intervention for children with autism served in community mental health clinics", J Child Fam Stud, 22, pp.414~422 (2013)[DOI]
- Elwood ET, "Parental satisfaction with the CranioCap: a new cranial orthosis for deformational plagiocephaly", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 42, pp.340~343 (2005)[DOI]
- Katzel EB, "Treatment of plagiocephaly with helmet molding therapy: do actual results mimic perception?", Cleft Palate Craniofac J, 48, pp.205~209 (2011)[DOI]
- Loveday BP, "Active counterpositioning or orthotic device to treat positional plagiocephaly?", J Craniofac Surg, 12, pp.308~313 (2001)[DOI]
- Mortenson PA, "Quantifying positional plagiocephaly: reliability and validity of anthropometric measurements", J Craniofac Surg, 17, pp.413~419 (2006)[DOI]
- Turner-Stokes L, "Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide", Clin Rehabil, 23, pp.362~370 (2009)[DOI]
- Kiresuk TJ, "Goal attainment scaling: a general method for evaluating comprehensive community mental health programs", Community Ment Health J, 4, pp.443~453 (1968)[DOI]
- Rockwood K, "Use of goal attainment scaling in measuring clinically important change in cognitive rehabilitation patients", J Clin Epidemiol, 50, pp.581~588 (1997)[DOI]
- Wilbrand JF, "Complications in helmet therapy", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 40, pp.341~346 (2012)[DOI]
- Freudlsperger C, "The incidence of complications associated with molding helmet therapy: an avoidable risk in the treatment of positional head deformities?", J Craniofac Surg, 26, pp.e299~e302 (2015)[DOI]
- de Ribaupierre S, "Posterior positional plagiocephaly treated with cranial remodeling orthosis", Swiss Med Wkly, 137, pp.368~372 (2007)
- Vles JS, "Helmet versus nonhelmet treatment in nonsynostotic positional posterior plagiocephaly", J Craniofac Surg, 11, pp.572~574 (2000)[DOI]
- Kluba S, "Treatment of positional plagiocephaly: helmet or no helmet?", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 42, pp.683~688 (2014)[DOI]
- Freudlsperger C, "Impact of severity and therapy onset on helmet therapy in positional plagiocephaly", J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 44, pp.110~115 (2016)[DOI]
- Graham JM Jr, "Management of deformational plagiocephaly: repositioning versus orthotic therapy", J Pediatr, 146, pp.258~262 (2005)[DOI]
- Seruya M, "Helmet treatment of deformational plagiocephaly: the relationship between age at initiation and rate of correction", Plast Reconstr Surg, 131, pp.55e~61e (2013)[DOI]
- Bailey DB Jr, "Creating family-centered services in early intervention: perceptions of professionals in four states", Except Child, 58, pp.298~309 (1992)[DOI]
- King G, "Interpersonal aspects of care-giving and client outcomes: a review of the literature", Ambul Child Health, 2, pp.151~160 (1996)