Factors Affecting Rehabilitation Outcome of Congenital Muscular Torticollis
2
조회
0
다운로드
4
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
ObjectiveTo explore the factors affecting rehabilitation outcome of congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) patients and suggest the onset time, method and the duration of the rehabilitation treatment. Method112 patients diagnosed as CMT were enrolled and we reviewed the patients’ charts and radiologic findings, retrospectively. We reviewed the sex, gestational age, birth weight, mode of delivery, age at diagnosis, mass thickness, ratio of mass thickness, mass site, plagiocephaly, clavicle fracture, the frequency of rehabilitation treatment. ResultsThe patients with a plagiocephaly or a clavicle fracture had been needed significantly longer rehabilitation and ratio of mass thickness and rehabilitative duration had a positive linear relationship and diagnostic time and the duration of rehabilitative treatment showed a positive correlation. However, rehabilitation frequency did not equate to a shorter rehabilitation period and mass site did not correlate with the duration of rehabilitation treatment. Also, the group treated with manipulation with additional ultrasound treatment showed no significant difference to the group treated with only manipulation. In this study, 2 patients received surgical treatment, which was SCM tenotomy of the affected side in conjunction with rehabilitation therapy. ConclusionThis study showed that plagiocephaly, clavicle fracture, mass ratio, and diagnosis time are clinically significant in determining rehabilitative treatment. So, it is imperative to make a timely diagnosis and objectively evaluate the tilting of the head and neck, as well as checking the mass ratio and identifying the presence of clavicle fractures.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo explore the factors affecting rehabilitation outcome of congenital muscular torticollis (CMT) patients and suggest the onset time, method and the duration of the rehabilitation treatment. Method112 patients diagnosed as CMT were enrolled and we reviewed the patients’ charts and radiologic findings, retrospectively. We reviewed the sex, gestational age, birth weight, mode of delivery, age at diagnosis, mass thickness, ratio of mass thickness, mass site, plagiocephaly, clavicle fracture, the frequency of rehabilitation treatment. ResultsThe patients with a plagiocephaly or a clavicle fracture had been needed significantly longer rehabilitation and ratio of mass thickness and rehabilitative duration had a positive linear relationship and diagnostic time and the duration of rehabilitative treatment showed a positive correlation. However, rehabilitation frequency did not equate to a shorter rehabilitation period and mass site did not correlate with the duration of rehabilitation treatment. Also, the group treated with manipulation with additional ultrasound treatment showed no significant difference to the group treated with only manipulation. In this study, 2 patients received surgical treatment, which was SCM tenotomy of the affected side in conjunction with rehabilitation therapy. ConclusionThis study showed that plagiocephaly, clavicle fracture, mass ratio, and diagnosis time are clinically significant in determining rehabilitative treatment. So, it is imperative to make a timely diagnosis and objectively evaluate the tilting of the head and neck, as well as checking the mass ratio and identifying the presence of clavicle fractures.
참고문헌 (31)
- Binder H, "Congenital muscular torticollis: results of conservative management with long- term follow-up in 85 cases", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 68, pp.222~225 (1987)
- Canale ST, "Congenital muscular torticollis. A long-term follow-up", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 64A, pp.810~816 (1982)
- Kim MO, "Results of the conservative management in congenital muscular torticollis", J Korean Acad Rehab Med, 16, pp.42~50 (1992)
- Lee YT, "A clinical study of congenital muscular torticollis", J Korean Orthop Assoc, 21, pp.423~432 (1986)
- Coventry MB, "Congenital muscular torticollis in infancy; some observations regarding treatment", J Bone Joint Surg Am, 41, pp.815~822 (1959)
- Ling CM, "Sternomastoid tumor and muscular torticollis", Clin Orthop Relat Ress, 86, pp.144~150 (1972)
- Suk SI, "The orthopaedics", pp.66~68 (1986), Korean Orthop Assoc
- Cheng JC, "The clinical presentation and outcome of treatment of congenital muscular torticollis in infants-a study of 1,086 cases", J Pediatr Surg, 35, pp.1091~1096 (2000)
- Chang PY, "Torticollis: a long-term follow-up study", Acta Paed Sin, 37, pp.173~177 (1996)
- Park JH, "Rehabilitation of torticollis in children", J Korean Acad Rehab Med, 22, pp.261~268 (1998)
- Park JM, "Ultrasonographic measurement of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in congenital muscular torticollis", J Korean Acad Rehab Med, 22, pp.955~959 (1998)
- 전지은, "선천성 근성 사경의 임상적 특징", Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 50(4), pp.241~247 (2007), 대한소아과학회
- 김세주, "선천성 근성 사경의 흉쇄유양돌기근육 초음파 소견과 치료 결과", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 25(4), pp.601~608 (2001), 대한재활의학회
- Lin JN, "Ultrasonographic study of the sternocleidomastoid muscle in the management of congenital muscular torticollis", J Pedatric Surg, 32, pp.1648~1651 (1997)
- Mickelson MR, "Ultrastructure of sternocleidomastoid muscle in muscular torticollis", Clin Orthop Relat Res, 110, pp.11~18 (1975)
- Emery C, "The determinants of treatment duration for congenital muscular torticollis", Phys Ther, 74, pp.921~929 (1994)
- Jacques C, "The use of splinting in conservative and post-operative treatment of congenital muscular torticollis", pp.81~90 (1997), Haworth Press, Inc
- Luther BL, "Congenital muscular torticollis", Orthop Nurs, 21, pp.21~28 (2002)
- Mohammadi B, "A long-term follow-up of botulinum toxin A in cervical dystonia", Neurol Res, 31, pp.463~466 (2009)
- Sanerkin NG, "Edwards P. Birth injury to the sternomastoid muscle", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 48, pp.441~447 (1966)
- Macdonald C, "Sternomastoid tumor and muscular torticollis", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 51, pp.432~443 (1969)
- Davids JR, "Congenital muscular torticollis: sequela of intrauterine or perinatal compartment dysndrome", J Rediatr Orthop, 13, pp.141~147 (1993)
- Sarnat HB, "Idiopathic torticollis: sternocleidomastoid myopathy and accessory neuropathy", Muslce Nerve, 4, pp.374~380 (1981)
- Chan YL, "Ultrasonography of congenital muscular torticollis", Pediatr Radiol, 22, pp.356~360 (1992)
- Klaus R, "Sonography of neck mass in children", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 146, pp.609~613 (1986)
- Hulbert KF, "Congenital torticollis", J Bone Joint Surg Br, 32, pp.50~59 (1950)
- Ballock RT, "The prevalence of nonmuscular cuases of torticollis in children", J Pediatr Orthop, 16, pp.500~504 (1996)
- Chung IH, "Congenital muscular torticollis. Analysis of 17 cases", Yonsei Med J, 9, pp.116~120 (1968)
- Allen HR, "Adams and victor's principles of neurology", pp.1244~1249 (2005), McGraw Hill
- Littlefield TR, "Treatment of craniofacial asymmetry with dynamic orthotic cranioplasty", J Craniofac Surg, 9, pp.11~17 (1998)
- Singh A, "What is the role of helmet therapy in positional plagiocephaly?", Arch Dis Child, 93, pp.807~809 (2008)