본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Predictors of Community Participation Among Individuals With First Stroke: A Thailand Study

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective To describe perceived participation among persons with first stroke and to identify the predictors based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) concept of participation after stroke. Methods A total of 121 participants completed 4 questionnaires: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA), Personal Resource Questionnaire (PRQ2000), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and personal history. They were evaluated for their balance, motor function, functional and walking ability. Results The majority of participants perceived participation restriction in family role as poor to very poor. The best predictors of participation included social support, walking and balance, functional ability, number of secondary health problems and affected side, account for 66.6% of the variances in participation. Conclusion The study highlights the importance of social support, walking and balance performance, functional ability in daily living, and number of secondary health problems after stroke. These factors that facilitate participation after stroke should be addressed by health personnel during rehabilitation.

Abstract

Objective To describe perceived participation among persons with first stroke and to identify the predictors based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) concept of participation after stroke. Methods A total of 121 participants completed 4 questionnaires: the Impact on Participation and Autonomy (IPA), Personal Resource Questionnaire (PRQ2000), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and personal history. They were evaluated for their balance, motor function, functional and walking ability. Results The majority of participants perceived participation restriction in family role as poor to very poor. The best predictors of participation included social support, walking and balance, functional ability, number of secondary health problems and affected side, account for 66.6% of the variances in participation. Conclusion The study highlights the importance of social support, walking and balance performance, functional ability in daily living, and number of secondary health problems after stroke. These factors that facilitate participation after stroke should be addressed by health personnel during rehabilitation.

참고문헌 (34)

  1. "Annual report of the Noncommunicable Disease Office 2015" (2015)[URL]
  2. Kissela BM, "Age at stroke: temporal trends in stroke incidence in a large, biracial population", Neurology, 79, pp.1781~1787 (2012)[DOI]
  3. Hartman-Maeir A, "Activities, participation and satisfaction one-year post stroke", Disabil Rehabil, 29, pp.559~566 (2007)[DOI]
  4. Egan M, "Participation and well-being poststroke: evidence of reciprocal effects", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 95, pp.262~268 (2014)[DOI]
  5. Dijkers MP, "Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: an overview", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 91(9 Suppl), pp.S5~S16 (2010)[DOI]
  6. Heinemann AW, "Measurement of participation in rehabilitation research", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 91(9 Suppl), pp.S1~S4 (2010)[DOI]
  7. World Health Organization, "The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF)", World Health Organization, 10~17 (2001)
  8. Hammel J, "What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities", Disabil Rehabil, 30, pp.1445~1460 (2008)[DOI]
  9. Obembe A, "Community reintegration in stroke survivors: relationship with motor function and depression", Hong Kong Physiother J, 31, pp.69~74 (2013)[DOI]
  10. Schmid AA, "Balance and balance self-efficacy are associated with activity and participation after stroke: a cross-sectional study in people with chronic stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 93, pp.1101~1107 (2012)[DOI]
  11. Fallahpour M, "Perceived participation and autonomy: aspects of functioning and contextual factors predicting participation after stroke", J Rehabil Med, 43, pp.388~397 (2011)[DOI]
  12. Crawford A, "People with mobility impairments: physical activity and quality of participation", Disabil Health J, 1, pp.7~13 (2008)[DOI]
  13. Desrosiers J, "Predictors of long-term participation after stroke", Disabil Rehabil, 28, pp.221~230 (2006)[DOI]
  14. Desrosiers J, "Short-term changes in and predictors of participation of older adults after stroke following acute care or rehabilitation", Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 22, pp.288~297 (2008)[DOI]
  15. Pang MY, "Determinants of satisfaction with community reintegration in older adults with chronic stroke: role of balance self-efficacy", Phys Ther, 87, pp.282~291 (2007)[DOI]
  16. Bouffioulx E, "Satisfaction with activity and participation and its relationships with body functions, activities, or environmental factors in stroke patients", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 92, pp.1404~1410 (2011)[DOI]
  17. Nijasri C. Suwanwela, "Stroke Epidemiology in Thailand", 대한뇌졸중영문학회지, 16(1), pp.1~7 (2014), 대한뇌졸중학회[DOI]
  18. Suttiwong J, "Predicting community participation after spinal cord injury in Thailand", J Rehabil Med, 47, pp.325~329 (2015)[DOI]
  19. Khiaocharoen O, "Cost of acute and sub-acute care for stroke patients", J Med Assoc Thai, 95, pp.1266~1277 (2012)
  20. Kuptniratsaikul V, "An epidemiologic study of the Thai Stroke Rehabilitation Registry (TSRR): a multi-center study", J Med Assoc Thai, 91, pp.225~233 (2008)
  21. Hiengkaew V, "Home-based physical therapy for individuals with stroke in Thailand", Home Health Care Manag Pract, 28, pp.209~215 (2016)[DOI]
  22. Train the Brain Forum Committee, "Thai Mental State Examination (TMSE)", Siriraj Hosp Gaz, 45, pp.359~374 (1993)
  23. Suttiwong J, "Impact on participation and autonomy questionnaire: psychometric properties of the Thai version", J Phys Ther Sci, 25, pp.769~774 (2013)[DOI]
  24. Tuppotayan P, "The relationships between hope, social support and depressive symptoms in patients with spinal cord injury", pp.2007
  25. Nilchaikovit T, "Development of Thai version of hospital anxiety and depression scale in cancer patients", J Psychiatr Assoc Thai, 4, pp.18~30 (1996)
  26. Benaim C, "Validation of a standardized assessment of postural control in stroke patients: the Postural Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (PASS)", Stroke, 30, pp.1862~1868 (1999)[DOI]
  27. Wang CH, "Interrater reliability and validity of the stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement (stream) instrument", J Rehabil Med, 34, pp.20~24 (2002)[DOI]
  28. Dajpratham P, "The inter-rater reliability of Barthel Index (Thai version) in stroke patients", J Thai Rehabilitation, 16, pp.1~9 (2006)
  29. Mehrholz J, "Predictive validity and responsiveness of the functional ambulation category in hemiparetic patients after stroke", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 88, pp.1314~1319 (2007)[DOI]
  30. Field A, "Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics", pp.293~356 (2013), Sage Publications
  31. Cardol M, "Beyond disability: perceived participation in people with a chronic disabling condition", Clin Rehabil, 16, pp.27~35 (2002)[DOI]
  32. Chau JP, "Determinants of participation restriction among community dwelling stroke survivors: a path analysis", BMC Neurol, 9, pp.49~ (2009)[DOI]
  33. Desrosiers J, "Predictors of handicap situations following poststroke rehabilitation", Disabil Rehabil, 24, pp.774~785 (2002)[DOI]
  34. Rochette A, "Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke", Disabil Rehabil, 23, pp.559~569 (2001)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (14건)