본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Determining the Reliability of a New Method for Measuring Joint Range of Motion Through a Randomized Controlled Trial

2

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류재활의학

초록

Objective To compare the reliability and validity of the Korean range of motion standard protocol (KRSP) for measuring joint range of motion (ROM) with those of the conventional ROM measurement using a goniometer. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 91 healthy elderly individuals. We compared two strategies of measuring joint ROM to evaluate the reliability and validity of each standardized protocol: first, the KRSP based on the Chungnam National University guidelines and second, handheld goniometric measurement. In the first strategy, 3 examiners (1 rehabilitation doctor, 1 physical therapist, and 1 physical therapy student) independently measured joint ROM in 46 randomly selected subjects; in the second strategy, another 3 examiners (1 rehabilitation doctor, 1 physical therapist, and 1 physical therapy student) measured joint ROM in 45 randomly selected subjects. The reliability of each protocol was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC(2,1), and root mean square error (RMSE). Results Both protocols showed good to excellent intra-rater reliability. With goniometer use, the inter-rater reliability was low—ICC(2,1), 95% confidence interval ranged from 0.643 (0.486–0.783) to -0.078 (-0.296–0.494)—and RMSE was high. With the KRSP, the inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.846 (0.686–0.931) to 0.986 (0.972–0.994) and RMSE was low. Conclusion ROM measurements using the KRSP showed excellent reliability. These results indicate that this protocol can be the reference standard for measuring ROM in clinical settings as an alternative to goniometers.

Abstract

Objective To compare the reliability and validity of the Korean range of motion standard protocol (KRSP) for measuring joint range of motion (ROM) with those of the conventional ROM measurement using a goniometer. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled trial involving 91 healthy elderly individuals. We compared two strategies of measuring joint ROM to evaluate the reliability and validity of each standardized protocol: first, the KRSP based on the Chungnam National University guidelines and second, handheld goniometric measurement. In the first strategy, 3 examiners (1 rehabilitation doctor, 1 physical therapist, and 1 physical therapy student) independently measured joint ROM in 46 randomly selected subjects; in the second strategy, another 3 examiners (1 rehabilitation doctor, 1 physical therapist, and 1 physical therapy student) measured joint ROM in 45 randomly selected subjects. The reliability of each protocol was calculated using intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC(2,1), and root mean square error (RMSE). Results Both protocols showed good to excellent intra-rater reliability. With goniometer use, the inter-rater reliability was low—ICC(2,1), 95% confidence interval ranged from 0.643 (0.486–0.783) to -0.078 (-0.296–0.494)—and RMSE was high. With the KRSP, the inter-rater reliability ranged from 0.846 (0.686–0.931) to 0.986 (0.972–0.994) and RMSE was low. Conclusion ROM measurements using the KRSP showed excellent reliability. These results indicate that this protocol can be the reference standard for measuring ROM in clinical settings as an alternative to goniometers.

참고문헌 (33)

  1. Fleiss, JL, "The equivalence of weighted kappa and the intraclass correlation coefficient as measures of reliability", Educ Psychol Meas, 33, pp.613~619 (1973)[DOI]
  2. Cocchiarella L, "Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment", pp.433~555 (2000), American Medical Association
  3. Rondinelli R, "Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment" (2007), American Medical Association
  4. American Medical Association, "AMA Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment" (1993), American Medical Association
  5. American Medical Association, "Guides to the evaluation of permanent impairment" (1990), American Medical Association
  6. McBride ED, "Disability evaluation and principles of treatment of compensable injuries" (1963), J. B. Lippincott
  7. Kang Hee Cho, "Range of Motion of the Ankle According to Pushing Force, Gender and Knee Position", Annals of Rehabilitation Medicine, 40(2), pp.271~278 (2016), 대한재활의학회
  8. Laupattarakasem W, "Axial rotation gravity goniometer. A simple design of instrument and a controlled reliability study", Clin Orthop Relat Res, (251), pp.271~274 (1990)
  9. Gajdosik RL, "Clinical measurement of range of motion. Review of goniometry emphasizing reliability and validity", Phys Ther, 67, pp.1867~1872 (1987)
  10. Kolber MJ, "The reliability and concurrent validity of scapular plane shoulder elevation measurements using a digital inclinometer and goniometer", Physiother Theory Pract, 28, pp.161~168 (2012)
  11. van Trijffel E, "Inter-rater reliability for measurement of passive physiological movements in lower extremity joints is generally low : a systematic review", J Physiother, 56, pp.223~235 (2010)
  12. Park W, "Obesity effect on male active joint range of motion", Ergonomics, 53, pp.102~108 (2010)
  13. Herda L, "Using skeleton-based tracking to increase the reliability of optical motion capture", Hum Mov Sci, 20, pp.313~341 (2001)
  14. Perez R, "Upper limb portable motion analysis system based on inertial technology for neurorehabilitation purposes", Sensors(Basel), 10, pp.10733~10751 (2010)
  15. El-Zayat BF, "Objective assessment, repeatability, and agreement of shoulder ROM with a 3D gyroscope", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 14, pp.72~ (2013)
  16. Bonnechere B, "Validity and reliability of the Kinect within functional assessment activities : comparison with standard stereophotogrammetry", Gait Posture, 39, pp.593~598 (2014)
  17. Lee SH, "Measurement of shoulder range of motion in patients with adhesive capsulitis using a kinect", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0129398~ (2015)
  18. Werner BC, "Validation of an innovative method of shoulder range-of-motion measurement using a smartphone clinometer application", J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 23, pp.e275~82 (2014)
  19. Shin SH, "Within-day reliability of shoulder range of motion measurement with a smartphone", Man Ther, 17, pp.298~304 (2012)
  20. Jenny JY, "Measurement of the knee flexion angle with a Smartphone-application is precise and accurate", J Arthroplasty, 28, pp.784~787 (2013)
  21. Milanese S, "Reliability and concurrent validity of knee angle measurement : smart phone app versus universal goniometer used by experienced and novice clinicians", Man Ther, 19, pp.569~574 (2014)
  22. Vohralik SL, "Reliability and validity of a smartphone app to measure joint range", Am J Phys Med Rehabil, 94, pp.325~330 (2015)
  23. Hoving JL, "How reliably do rheumatologists measure shoulder movement", Ann Rheum Dis, 61, pp.612~616 (2002)
  24. de Winter AF, "Inter-observer reproducibility of measurements of range of motion in patients with shoulder pain using a digital inclinometer", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 5, pp.18~ (2004)
  25. Hayes K, "Reliability of five methods for assessing shoulder range of motion", Aust J Physiother, 47, pp.289~294 (2001)
  26. Rothstein JM, "Goniometric reliability in a clinical setting. Elbow and knee measurements", Phys Ther, 63, pp.1611~1615 (1983)
  27. Watkins MA, "Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of knee range of motion obtained in a clinical setting", Phys Ther, 71, pp.90~96 (1991)
  28. Youdas JW, "Reliability of goniometric measurements and visual estimates of ankle joint active range of motion obtained in a clinical setting", Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 74, pp.1113~1118 (1993)
  29. LaStayo PC, "Reliability of passive wrist flexion and extension goniometric measurements : a multicenter study", Phys Ther, 74, pp.162~174 (1994)
  30. Horger MM, "The reliability of goniometric measurements of active and passive wrist motions", Am J Occup Ther, 44, pp.342~348 (1990)
  31. Armstrong AD, "Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm", J Shoulder Elbow Surg, 7, pp.573~580 (1998)
  32. Herrero P, "Reliability of goniometric measurements in children with cerebral palsy: a comparative analysis of universal goniometer and electronic inclinometer. A pilot study", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 12, pp.155~ (2011)
  33. Poulsen E, "Reproducibility of range of motion and muscle strength measurements in patients with hip osteoarthritis : an inter-rater study", BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 13, pp.242~ (2012)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)