두 가지의 민속학과 의식주 연구 -한복·한식·한옥에서 복식·음식·주거로-
Two Things of Folklore and a Study of Food, Clothing and Housing
0
조회
0
다운로드
5
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This study makes a claim about an issue that exists in the study of food, clothing and housing in Korean folklore research fields. Generally, folklore studies on food, clothing and housing have dealt within the scope of “material culture.” However, the beginning, folklore research, which started in the 19th Century, did not discuss much about the material cultures of food, clothing and housing. The early folklore was mainly focused on “the life stories of people.” Due to industrialization, material folk culture started to disappear. Therefore, the study of the material folk cultures of food, clothing and housing became an important field of research into folklore. The situation is quite similar in Korean folklore as well. Above all, the research on food, clothing, and housing was performed by some scientific scholars, because there were fewer folklorists before 1990s, and the research was mainly focused on the historic approach rather than the folkloristic approach. One of the reasons was that most of the scholars believed that it was useful to historically verify “the identity of ethnic culture.” One study of genuine ethnic groups and the history of people started from an early stage of ancient times and it has lasted until now. I would call it “modern folklore.” The modern folklore served politically by trying to make an ethnic group of people in a modern state who were educated by the nation state. Conventional research on food, clothing and housing in modern folklore mainly discusses “traditional” things rather than “practical” things in reference to the study of Korean traditional food, clothing and housing. Consequently, focus has been on the past. An ethnicity oriented approach was made by modern folklorists. After all, the 21st-century folkloristic research on food, clothing and housing, which was being conducted within the framework of the nation state, should now look to the fashion, food, and housing that were actually being consumed by Korean people. Thus, I coin the issue of “postmodern folklore” as a method of theorizing and study which can overcome the limitations of modern folklore. Furthermore, here are some other suggestions for research into modern folklore. First, understanding some of the phenomena of producing and consuming patterns in current fashion, food and housing is mandatory. It is necessary to adopt a new research method encompassing modernity and ecology of everyday life necessities as they could be applied to the study of modern folklore. Secondly, consuming food, clothing, and housing is a very important research topic which has formulated during modern times. Thirdly, take a look very carefully at “the house” as a scene of consuming food, fashion and housing. Finally, a very significant pursuit is underway, led by conventional folklorists on the research of food, clothing and housing, which is considered to be a special and an old “the knowledge of folk.” This method reveals many meanings which can be applied as cultural contents. We should focus on an integrated perspective on food, fashion and housing. We should abandon the perspective of the material itself. To make it possible to pursue the research on food, fashion, and housing, we need to gain a deep perspective into the local community members who actually exist and have personal knowledge of folk culture. This effort will shed light on the meaning of the knowledge of folk from a single system to a plural system, which modern folklorists have greatly sought after.
Abstract
This study makes a claim about an issue that exists in the study of food, clothing and housing in Korean folklore research fields. Generally, folklore studies on food, clothing and housing have dealt within the scope of “material culture.” However, the beginning, folklore research, which started in the 19th Century, did not discuss much about the material cultures of food, clothing and housing. The early folklore was mainly focused on “the life stories of people.” Due to industrialization, material folk culture started to disappear. Therefore, the study of the material folk cultures of food, clothing and housing became an important field of research into folklore. The situation is quite similar in Korean folklore as well. Above all, the research on food, clothing, and housing was performed by some scientific scholars, because there were fewer folklorists before 1990s, and the research was mainly focused on the historic approach rather than the folkloristic approach. One of the reasons was that most of the scholars believed that it was useful to historically verify “the identity of ethnic culture.” One study of genuine ethnic groups and the history of people started from an early stage of ancient times and it has lasted until now. I would call it “modern folklore.” The modern folklore served politically by trying to make an ethnic group of people in a modern state who were educated by the nation state. Conventional research on food, clothing and housing in modern folklore mainly discusses “traditional” things rather than “practical” things in reference to the study of Korean traditional food, clothing and housing. Consequently, focus has been on the past. An ethnicity oriented approach was made by modern folklorists. After all, the 21st-century folkloristic research on food, clothing and housing, which was being conducted within the framework of the nation state, should now look to the fashion, food, and housing that were actually being consumed by Korean people. Thus, I coin the issue of “postmodern folklore” as a method of theorizing and study which can overcome the limitations of modern folklore. Furthermore, here are some other suggestions for research into modern folklore. First, understanding some of the phenomena of producing and consuming patterns in current fashion, food and housing is mandatory. It is necessary to adopt a new research method encompassing modernity and ecology of everyday life necessities as they could be applied to the study of modern folklore. Secondly, consuming food, clothing, and housing is a very important research topic which has formulated during modern times. Thirdly, take a look very carefully at “the house” as a scene of consuming food, fashion and housing. Finally, a very significant pursuit is underway, led by conventional folklorists on the research of food, clothing and housing, which is considered to be a special and an old “the knowledge of folk.” This method reveals many meanings which can be applied as cultural contents. We should focus on an integrated perspective on food, fashion and housing. We should abandon the perspective of the material itself. To make it possible to pursue the research on food, fashion, and housing, we need to gain a deep perspective into the local community members who actually exist and have personal knowledge of folk culture. This effort will shed light on the meaning of the knowledge of folk from a single system to a plural system, which modern folklorists have greatly sought after.
참고문헌 (27)
- "음식의 생산과 문화의 소비" (1994)
- "민속물질의 연구방법 한국민속학의 과제와 방법" (1986)
- "韓國의 住居民俗誌" (1988)
- "한韓브랜드화 정책포럼자료집" (2005), 서울:문화관광부
- "한국 민속학의 이해" (1994), 민속학회편 문학아카데미
- "거주공간의 이용관행과 가족관계, 성, 가족, 그리고 문화인류학적 접근" (1998), 서울:집문당
- "물질문화 연구의 성과와 전망, 광복 50년 국학, 성과와 전망" (1995), 성남:한국정신문화연구원
- "민족의 사회학 설명과 ‘상상의 공동체론’ 비판", 40(1) (2006), 서울:한국사회학회
- "물질문화연구와 박물관-생활용구를 중심으로-", (2) (2001), 국립민속박물관
- "물질문화 연구와 박물관" (1988)
- "민속문화의 현대적 수용과 변용의 논리, 민속문화의 수용과 변용" (1999), 서울:집문당
- "민속학연구 50년사", 22(1) (1996), 서울:일지사
- "의식주와 도구, 韓國의 鄕村民俗誌(Ⅲ)-仁川廣域市 江華郡篇-" (1996), 성남:韓國精神文化硏究院
- "음식전쟁 문화전쟁" (2000), 서울:사계절
- "경기북부의 식생활, 경기동부의 식생활, 경기민속지(Ⅳ의식주편)" (2001), 용인:경기도박물관
- "食口論 : 현대 한국사회에서의 음식관습", 25(1) (2002), 성남:한국정신문화연구원
- "韓國における生活文化硏究と生活財生態學, 2002年ソウルスタイル:硏究と展示の評價", 44 (2003), 大阪:國立民族學博物館
- "서울 생활민속연구의 현황과 과제", (5) (2006), 서울:서울역사박물관
- "서양의 물질문화연구 현황", (1) (2000), 국립민속박물관
- "日本人の人類學的自畵像" (2006), 東京:筑摩書房
- "2002年 ソウルスタイル李さん一家の素顔のくらし" (2002), 大阪:財團法人千里文化財團
- "The Handbook of Folklore"
- "(1983) 상상의 공동체(민족주의의 기원과 전파에 대한 성찰)" (2002), 서울:나남출판사
- "만들어진 전통" (2004), 서울:휴머니스트
- "Introduction Concepts of Folklore and Folklife Studies The University of Chicago Press" (1972)
- "The Material Life of Human Beings" (1991)
- "A Dictionary of Plant-Lore" (1995), Oxford:Oxford Unive
