본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Popularization of Medical Information

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

Objectives: Despite the popularization of technology and the high penetration rate of smartphones and mobile devices, differencesexist in the accessibility, utilization capabilities, and quality of technology depending on users’ characteristics. Sincethese discrepancies can threaten health information equity, popularization of medical information is essential. This reviewarticle examines domestic and international cases of popularization of medical information, and discusses the related issues,expectations, and practical measures to achieve the popularization of medical information. Methods: In this study, medicalinformation was categorized as Electronic Health Records/Electronic Medical Records (EHR/EMRs; hospital-driven medicalinformation), personal health records (PHRs; user-driven medical information), and patient-generated health data (PGHD;user-generated medical information [outside hospitals]). This article reviewed the domestic and international use status, acceptancerates, and use cases for each type of medical information. Issues and expectations about policies and cases related tothe popularization of medical information were also described, and finally, practical measures to accomplish the popularizationof medical information were discussed. Results: To achieve the popularization of medical information, the followingmeasures should be considered: engaging health consumers to participate in the early stages of information production, cultivatingdigital literacy, producing easy-to-use and interesting medical content, visualizing health information, and creatinga medical thesaurus. Conclusions: Healthcare providers should make regular efforts to popularize medical information. Thepopularization of medical information is an essential process to achieve health equity and digital health equity.

Abstract

Objectives: Despite the popularization of technology and the high penetration rate of smartphones and mobile devices, differencesexist in the accessibility, utilization capabilities, and quality of technology depending on users’ characteristics. Sincethese discrepancies can threaten health information equity, popularization of medical information is essential. This reviewarticle examines domestic and international cases of popularization of medical information, and discusses the related issues,expectations, and practical measures to achieve the popularization of medical information. Methods: In this study, medicalinformation was categorized as Electronic Health Records/Electronic Medical Records (EHR/EMRs; hospital-driven medicalinformation), personal health records (PHRs; user-driven medical information), and patient-generated health data (PGHD;user-generated medical information [outside hospitals]). This article reviewed the domestic and international use status, acceptancerates, and use cases for each type of medical information. Issues and expectations about policies and cases related tothe popularization of medical information were also described, and finally, practical measures to accomplish the popularizationof medical information were discussed. Results: To achieve the popularization of medical information, the followingmeasures should be considered: engaging health consumers to participate in the early stages of information production, cultivatingdigital literacy, producing easy-to-use and interesting medical content, visualizing health information, and creatinga medical thesaurus. Conclusions: Healthcare providers should make regular efforts to popularize medical information. Thepopularization of medical information is an essential process to achieve health equity and digital health equity.

참고문헌 (16)

  1. "Social determinants of health: health equity" (2021)[URL]
  2. Lee J, "The impact of health information technology on disparity of process of care", Int J Equity Health, 14, pp.34~ (2015)
  3. "The report on the Digital Divide 2018" (2019)[URL]
  4. "Hospital EMR systems market by component (software, services, hardware), delivery mode (cloud, on-premise), type (specialty EMR), hospital size (small, large hospitals) and region (North America, Europe, Asia Pacific) - Global Forecast to 2025" (2021)[URL]
  5. IRS Global, "The fourth industrial revolution, convergence trends and market prospects of ICT new technologies in digital healthcare" (2017), IRS Global Publishing Division
  6. "Technology roadmap for SME (2018-2020): medical service equipment" (2018)[URL]
  7. Jeong GS, "Trends in standards and testing certification technologies : personal health record(PHR)industry, standards and policy trends", TTA J, 164, pp.65~69 (2016)
  8. Jeon JO, "Current status and development of electronic medical records introduction in Korea", HIRA Policy Trends, 12(3), pp.7~16 (2018)
  9. Chen M, "5Gsmart diabetes : toward personalized diabetes diagnosis with healthcare big data clouds", IEEE Commun Mag, 56(4), pp.16~23 (2018)
  10. Ashrafzadeh S, "Patient-driven diabetes care of the future in the technology era", Cell Metab, 29(3), pp.564~575 (2019)
  11. Keum DH, "Wireless smart contact lens for diabetic diagnosis and therapy", Sci Adv, 6(17), pp.eaba3252~ (2020)
  12. Ku M, "Smart, soft contact lens for wireless immunosensing of cortisol", Sci Adv, 6(28), pp.eabb2891~ (2020)
  13. Park JH, "Service design" (2017), DaeWang Sa
  14. Hyeoi-Yun Lee, "Prerequisites for Effective Implementation of Telemedicine: Focusing on Current Situations in Korea", Healthcare Informatics Research, 21(4), pp.251~254 (2015), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
  15. 김종엽, "Contactless Healthcare", Healthcare Informatics Research, 26(4), pp.253~254 (2020), 대한의료정보학회[DOI]
  16. Seo IG, "A study on user experience-oriented self-managing blood pressure device interface design", pp.2013

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (10건)