미국의 종교성과 신보수주의의 담론적 함의
American Religion and Its Implications of Neoconservative Discourse in the U.S.
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The Bush administration has consistently framed its foreign policy in religious language, following the September 11 attack. It is understood that in practical terms, the separation of politics and religion is not categorically applied in the U.S. In that context, we examine how American religion has related to neoconservative foreign policy attitudes. Separation between church and state does not mean that religious views should be excluded from politics. The idea that public policies should not be influenced by religious beliefs is misguided. American foreign policy has encompassed religious discourse, including evangelical doctrine in order to make it more justifiable at home as well abroad, Critics argue that the American Christian Right was much more likely to influence American engagement in its foreign policy. However, engaging the Christian Right in broader foreign policy discussions needs to be seriously reexamined. On the assumption that the September 11 terror was considered sort of religious war against the American exceptionalism, the U.S. response to the terrorist attack tended to address more religious rhetoric and discourse. Inevitably or transiently, neoconservatism was overly mixed up with religious language, thus leading to the distortion that evangelicals, especially the Christian Right played a critical part in making American neoconservative policies. Christian evangelicals in the US are a very diverse group themselves rather than a monolithic organization. The relationship between Christian evangelicals and the support for neoconservative foreign policy is less likely to be evident.
Abstract
The Bush administration has consistently framed its foreign policy in religious language, following the September 11 attack. It is understood that in practical terms, the separation of politics and religion is not categorically applied in the U.S. In that context, we examine how American religion has related to neoconservative foreign policy attitudes. Separation between church and state does not mean that religious views should be excluded from politics. The idea that public policies should not be influenced by religious beliefs is misguided. American foreign policy has encompassed religious discourse, including evangelical doctrine in order to make it more justifiable at home as well abroad, Critics argue that the American Christian Right was much more likely to influence American engagement in its foreign policy. However, engaging the Christian Right in broader foreign policy discussions needs to be seriously reexamined. On the assumption that the September 11 terror was considered sort of religious war against the American exceptionalism, the U.S. response to the terrorist attack tended to address more religious rhetoric and discourse. Inevitably or transiently, neoconservatism was overly mixed up with religious language, thus leading to the distortion that evangelicals, especially the Christian Right played a critical part in making American neoconservative policies. Christian evangelicals in the US are a very diverse group themselves rather than a monolithic organization. The relationship between Christian evangelicals and the support for neoconservative foreign policy is less likely to be evident.
참고문헌 (41)
- 김녕, "한국정치와 교회-국가 갈등" (1996), 소나무
- 강명세, "미국정치의 양극화와 공화당의 우경화", 세종정책연구, 3(2) (2007)
- 김성건, "또끄빌과 미국의 시민종교", 한국사회학, 28(3), pp.163~186 (1994)
- 김성식, "政敎分離論", 기독교사상, (55) (1962)
- 김종서, "종교와 정치, In 현대 정치의 이해" (2003), 인간사랑
- 김지석, "미국을 파국으로 이끄는 세력에 대한 보고서" (2004), 교양인
- 강휘원, "미국 종교의 자유 성립과 보이지 않는 국교" (2006), 현상과 인식
- 고이치,모리, "종교국가 미국은 원리주의를 극복할 수 있을까?", 신학과 세계, (46), pp.137~154 (2003)
- 데이비,그레이스.(Davie,Grace), "유럽: 규칙을 입증하는 예외?, In 『세속화냐? 탈세속화냐? : 종교의 부흥과 세계정치』(The Secularization of the World : Resurgent Religion and World Politics)" (2002), 대한기독교서회
- 드바쉬, "프랑스 사회와 문화 II" (2004), 서울대출판부
- 뢰리히, 빌프리트, "종교 근본주의와 종교분쟁(Die Macht der Religionen)" (2007), 바이북스
- 마상윤, "미국 신보수주의의 역사적 배경: 탈냉전에서 이라크 전쟁까지, In 네오콘 프로젝트" (2005), 사회평론
- 미드, 월터 러셀, "하나님은 놀라운 일을 행하셨다(God and Gold)" (2007), 김영사
- 버거,피터(Berger,Peter), "세상의 탈세속화 : 개관, In 세속화냐?탈세속화냐?:종교의 부흥과 세계정치" (2002), 대한기독교서회
- 박은진, "독립혁명기 미국 기독교의 시민종교화", 미국사연구, 24, pp.117~138 (2006), 한국미국사학회
- 손병권, "미국 신보수주의의 역사적 배경: 1930년대에서 레이건 행정부 시기까지, In 네오콘 프로젝트" (2005), 사회평론
- 신옥주, "히잡착용을 통하여 본 유럽에서의 종교자유에 대한 고찰 - 특히 독일을 중심으로 -", 공법학연구, 9(3), pp.305~329 (2008), 한국비교공법학회
- 안병진, "신보수주의의 이념적 뿌리와 정치적 함의: 레오 스트라우스를 중심으로", 한국정치학회보, 38(1), pp.127~142 (2004), 한국정치학회
- 유성진, "미국정치 보수화의 한 단면 : 기독교 우파의 부상과 공화당 지지기반의 재편", 국제정치논총, 48(3), pp.149~172 (2008), 한국국제정치학회
- 이현송, "불분명한 믿음과 미국 사회의 세속화?", 한국사회학, 43(4), pp.147~179 (2009), 한국사회학회
- 紫田敏夫, "政治와 宗敎" (1986), 교양사
- 최윤철, "종교의 자유와 국가의 종교적 중립성- 교사의 머리수건 착용에 관한 독일 연방헌법재판소의 결정을 중심으로 -", 공법연구, 32(3), pp.223~252 (2004), 한국공법학회
- 킴볼, 찰스, "종교가 사악해 질 때(When religion becomes evil)" (2002), 에코리브르
- 토크빌, "미국의 민주주의" (1983), 한길사
- Bachvich, Andrew J, "Evangelical foreign policy is over", The Boston Globe, (6) (2008)
- Baumgartner, Jody C., "A Clash of Civilizations? The Influence of Religion on Public Opinion of U.S. Foreign Policy in the Middle East", Political Research Quarterly, 61(2), pp.171~179 (2009)
- Bellah,Robert N, "Civil Religion in America" (2005), Dae이면
- Bolce, L. B, "American Politics Is Dominated by Battles Between Religious and Secular Voters, In How Does Religion Influence Politics?" (2006), Thomson Gale
- Chernus, Ira, "The War in Iraq and the Academic Study of Religion", Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 76(4), pp.844~873 (2008)
- 최명덕, "The Background of the Christian Right and their Involvement in Politics", 미국사연구, 19(19), pp.159~174 (2004), 한국미국사학회
- Danforth, John C, "The Republican Party Should Stop Cartering to Religious Voters, In How Does Religion Influence Politics?" (2006), Thomson Gale
- Froese, Paul, "AU.S. Holy War? The Effects of Religion on Iraq War Policy Attitudes", Social Science Quarterly, 90(1), pp.103~116 (2009)
- Harrington, Edward F, "Separation Between Church and State Does Not Mean That Religious Views Should Be Excluded from Politics" (2006), Thomson Gale
- Huntington, Samuel P, "Who Are We?: America's Great Debate" (2005), Free Press
- "Bush Says Islam Is a Great Religion that Preaches Peace(검색일 2009.5.12)" (2007)[URL]
- Lerner, Michael, "The Democratic Party Should Appeal to Religious Voters, In How Does Religion Influence Politics?" (2006), Thomson Gale
- "Christian Evangelicals and U.S Foreign Policy(검색일 2009.7.8)" (2006)[URL]
- Smidt,Corwin E, "Religion and American Attitude Toward Islam and an Invasion of Iraq", Sociology of Religion, 66(3), pp.243~261 (2005)
- Thiemann, Ronald F, "Religion in Public Life" (1996), Georgetown University Press
- Vercals,Kirsten, "Religion and its Impact on Foreign Policy in the United States and Germany : Similarities and Differences" (2008), Issue Brief