본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

청사공정 10년의 빛과 그림자

Qing History Project

0

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류기타사회과학

초록

This article is the study of The New Qing History Project, which The People’s Republic of China embarked on in 2002 and is expected to release in 2012. The New Qing History Project got attention for being the biggest Humanitarian and Social Science Project since the launching ofthe PRC in 1949. The biggest reason why PRC. launched The New Qing History Project in 2002 is because the Draft History of Oing (淸史橋) has been criticized for having many flaws. There were criticisms that the Draft History of Qing overrated Qing dynasty and Manchu tribe while underrating revolutionary activities and the founding of Republic of China, and that it was based on poorly organized documents. Besides, it exposed the Issue of Incoherency in perspective. The Kuomintang of China (KMT)’s strong push for revision and new compilation did not yield a fruitful result. The Communist Party of China(CPC)’s similar effort related to the Draft History of Qing was of little avail. The New Oing History Project is the end result of this earlier trial and error. Since 2002, the Preparatory Committee of The New Qing History Project ruled on organization, composition,writing style of New Qing History and coIlected scattered materials related with this project from China, Japan, Europe and so on. And many colIected sources, archives, historical records, primary writing by foreigners, and illustrative sources are published through diverse kinds of series books. It is true that there were great strides at collecting and announcing the material about the research of Qing History. However, since the state's power and capital have been immensely poured into this project, it is highly likely that covert alliances between the state and scholars affected the interpretation of the historical materials. 10years into the business, the result of The New Qing History Project has not arrived. The reason that this official announcement is delayed even with the enormous collecting of scripts may be that it is not easy to organize the incredible volume of material collected. Unfortunately, it will take much more time to finish its final editing.

Abstract

This article is the study of The New Qing History Project, which The People’s Republic of China embarked on in 2002 and is expected to release in 2012. The New Qing History Project got attention for being the biggest Humanitarian and Social Science Project since the launching ofthe PRC in 1949. The biggest reason why PRC. launched The New Qing History Project in 2002 is because the Draft History of Oing (淸史橋) has been criticized for having many flaws. There were criticisms that the Draft History of Qing overrated Qing dynasty and Manchu tribe while underrating revolutionary activities and the founding of Republic of China, and that it was based on poorly organized documents. Besides, it exposed the Issue of Incoherency in perspective. The Kuomintang of China (KMT)’s strong push for revision and new compilation did not yield a fruitful result. The Communist Party of China(CPC)’s similar effort related to the Draft History of Qing was of little avail. The New Oing History Project is the end result of this earlier trial and error. Since 2002, the Preparatory Committee of The New Qing History Project ruled on organization, composition,writing style of New Qing History and coIlected scattered materials related with this project from China, Japan, Europe and so on. And many colIected sources, archives, historical records, primary writing by foreigners, and illustrative sources are published through diverse kinds of series books. It is true that there were great strides at collecting and announcing the material about the research of Qing History. However, since the state's power and capital have been immensely poured into this project, it is highly likely that covert alliances between the state and scholars affected the interpretation of the historical materials. 10years into the business, the result of The New Qing History Project has not arrived. The reason that this official announcement is delayed even with the enormous collecting of scripts may be that it is not easy to organize the incredible volume of material collected. Unfortunately, it will take much more time to finish its final editing.

참고문헌 (53)

  1. 정혜중, "중국에서의 『청사고』 연구와 평가, In 중국의 청사공정 연구" (2008), 동북아역사재단
  2. 유장근, "중화인민공화국 시대의 청사 연구동향과 만주족의 지배 문제, In 중국의 청사공정 연구" (2008), 동북아역사재단
  3. 허혜윤, "청사공정의 배경과 현황", 중국근현대사연구, (42), pp.109~128 (2009), 중국근현대사학회
  4. 허혜윤, "‘청사공정(淸史工程)’의 배경과 현황 ―국가청사편찬위원회 관계자들을 만나다", 역사비평, (82), pp.321~349 (2008), 역사문제연구소
  5. 조영현, "청조의 수도론과 황제의 순행, In 중국의 청사 편찬과 청사 연구" (2010), 동북아역사재단
  6. 이준갑, "중국의 청사공정 연구상황, 2002-2009, In 중국의 청사 편찬과 청사 연구" (2010), 동북아역사재단
  7. 김형종, "중화인민공화국에서의 청사편수-‘신청사’ 평찬토론에 나타난 중국 학계의 반응 분석, In 중국의 청사공정 연구" (2008), 동북아역사재단
  8. 윤휘탁, "신중화주의--'중화민족 대가정 만들기'와 한반도" (2006), 푸른역사
  9. 정석범, "康雍乾시대 ‘大一統’ 정책과 시각 이미지", 미술사학, 23, pp.7~44 (2009), 한국미술사교육학회
  10. 于沛, "“世界眼光”的思考, In 淸史論集 上" (2006), 人民出版社
  11. 莊吉發, "從現存史館당看淸史的編修, In 淸史論集 下" (2006), 人民出版社
  12. 鄒愛蓮, "淸史編修工程與당안的整理利用, In 淸史論集 下" (2006), 人民出版社
  13. 溤明珠, "從《淸史》到《淸史稿校注》-“中華人民政府” 遷臺後整編《淸史》之經過, In 淸史論集 下" (2006), 人民出版社
  14. 李治亭, "論淸調的歷史地位", 社會科學戰線 (2010)
  15. 李治亭, "論淸大邊疆問題與國家“大一統", 雲南師範大學學報(哲社版) (2011)
  16. 溤爾康, "淸史硏究與政治", 史學月刊 (2005)
  17. 何星亮, "“大一統”理念與中國小數民族", 雲南社會科學 (2011)
  18. 葉高樹, "最近十年(1998-2008年) 臺灣淸史論著目錄", 臺灣師大歷史學報, 40 (2008)
  19. 馬大正, "世界視野與淸史纂修工程, In 淸史纂修硏究與評論" (2012), 上海古籍出版社
  20. 戴逸, "淸朝的與,盛,衰,亡, In 淸史纂修硏究與評論" (2012), 上海古籍出版社
  21. 趙珍, "生熊環境史硏究與《淸史·生熊環境志》編纂, In 淸史纂修硏究與評論" (2012), 上海古籍出版社
  22. 李治亭, "新修《淸史》傅記撰寫工作紀實, In 淸史纂修硏究與評論" (2012), 上海古籍出版社
  23. 朱誠如, "從《圖錄叢刊》論圖像史學的勃與, In 淸史纂修硏究與評論" (2012), 上海古籍出版社
  24. 劉潞, "《圖錄叢刊》編纂入問答, In 淸史纂修硏究與評論" (2012), 上海古籍出版社
  25. 李尙英, "“中華文史網”與淸史纂修, In 淸史纂修硏究與評論" (2012), 上海古籍出版社
  26. 孫喆, "淺析影響康熙《皇與全覽圖》繪制的幾個因素", 歷史당안 (2012)
  27. 鄒愛蓮, "日本關係淸代당안をめぐる國際硏究集會報告 文化遺産の應急的保護 と淸史編纂プロジェェクト", 東京大學史科編纂所硏究紀要, 20, pp.138~148 (2010)
  28. 加藤直人, "中日學者淸史硏究座談會-『淸史』編纂をめぐる日中學術協力の可能性", 滿族史硏究, 4, pp.210~217 (2005), 滿族史硏究會
  29. 張永江, "近百年來における中國編纂事業と最新の展狀況(上)", 滿族史硏究, 4 (2005)
  30. 張永江, "近百年來における中國編纂事業と最新の展狀況(下)", 滿族史硏究, 5 (2006)
  31. 華立, "臺灣佛光大學(第一屆淸史學術硏討會>參加記", 滿族史硏究, 3 (2004)
  32. Zhao Ma, "Research Trends in Asia: 'WRITING HISTORY DURING A PROSPEROUS AGE': The New Qing History Project", Late Imperial China, 29(1) (2008)
  33. Beatrice S. Bartlett, "The Newly Digitized Archives Program at China's Number One Historical Archives, Beijing", Late Imperial China, 32(1) (2011)
  34. Mao, Liping, "Writing History in the Digital Age": The New Qing History Project and the Digitization of Qing Archives", History Compass, 10(5) (2012)
  35. ZHOU AILIAN, "The Project of Organizing the Qing Archives", Chinese Studies in History, 43(2), pp.73~84 (2009)
  36. 유장근, "중국의 청사공정 연구" (2008), 동북아역사재단
  37. 김형종, "중국의 청사 편찬과 청사 연구" (2010), 동북아역사재단
  38. 馬釗, "1971-2006年美國淸史論著目錄" (2007), 人民出版社
  39. 戴逸, "簡明淸史(1,2)" (1980), 人民出版社
  40. 戴逸, "乾隆帝及其时代" (1992), 中國人民出版社
  41. 戴逸, "淸代人物硏究" (1992), 巴蜀書社
  42. 陳樺, "18世紀的中國與世界-經濟卷" (1999), 遼海出版社
  43. 陳捷先, "淸史論集 上下" (2006), 人民出版社
  44. 王鍾翰, "淸史滿族史講義稿" (2006), 鷺江出版社
  45. 蕭一山, "淸大通史(1-5)" (1985), 臺灣商務印書館
  46. 鄭天挺, "淸史 上" (1989), 天津人民出版社
  47. 鄭天挺, "淸史探微(北大名家名著文叢)" (1999), 北京大學出版社
  48. 溤爾康, "雍正傅" (1985), 人民出版社
  49. 溤爾康, "淸人社會生活" (1990), 天津人民出版社
  50. 溤爾康, "淸人生活谩步" (1999), 中國社會出版社
  51. 溤爾康, "淸大人物傅記史科硏究" (2000), 商務印書館
  52. 國家淸史編纂委員會體裁體例工作小組, "淸史編纂委員體裁體例討論集 上下" (2004), 中國人民大學出版社
  53. 國家淸史纂修程版社中心·吉林省社科院 社會科學戰線輯部, "淸史纂修硏究與評論" (2012), 上海古籍出版社

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (6건)