결혼이민여성의 인권행위에 관한 탐색적 연구
An exploratory study on the human rights acts of marriage migrant women
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Marriage migrant women brought into the Korean society since the early 1990s have been the focus of the discussion on a multicultural society. It is highly likely that marriage migrants are vulnerable to human rights violations such as domestic violence, financial difficulty, and discrimination in the community. In addition, they are more likely to be subject to conflicts in the family and difficulties of children's education due to the cultural difference. Multicultural Family Support Act was enacted for the purpose of their adjustment to our society and social integration, however, it is pointed out that the Act fails to fully protect their human rights. In the eye of marriage migrant women the discrimination still remains in our society. A fact finding survey on the human rights acts showed that 46.2%, 238 out of 510 participants experienced discrimination. Although most of the discrimination by the state was corrected, the discrimination in daily life can not be solved only by the political ideology of multiculturalism in light of the limit of law and people's prejudice against marriage migrant women. Human rights acts are defined as the acts that a person, the subject of rights with personality, demands fair treatment and protests against the discrimination in the face of unfair treatment and discrimination. Focused on the human rights acts of marriage migrant women, this study aims to examine the meaning and value of their human rights acts and explore the clue for the correction of the discrimination through the comparative analysis of groups with and without human rights acts against the discrimination.
Abstract
Marriage migrant women brought into the Korean society since the early 1990s have been the focus of the discussion on a multicultural society. It is highly likely that marriage migrants are vulnerable to human rights violations such as domestic violence, financial difficulty, and discrimination in the community. In addition, they are more likely to be subject to conflicts in the family and difficulties of children's education due to the cultural difference. Multicultural Family Support Act was enacted for the purpose of their adjustment to our society and social integration, however, it is pointed out that the Act fails to fully protect their human rights. In the eye of marriage migrant women the discrimination still remains in our society. A fact finding survey on the human rights acts showed that 46.2%, 238 out of 510 participants experienced discrimination. Although most of the discrimination by the state was corrected, the discrimination in daily life can not be solved only by the political ideology of multiculturalism in light of the limit of law and people's prejudice against marriage migrant women. Human rights acts are defined as the acts that a person, the subject of rights with personality, demands fair treatment and protests against the discrimination in the face of unfair treatment and discrimination. Focused on the human rights acts of marriage migrant women, this study aims to examine the meaning and value of their human rights acts and explore the clue for the correction of the discrimination through the comparative analysis of groups with and without human rights acts against the discrimination.
참고문헌 (33)
- 김기흥, "한국의 다문화 실현을 위한 이론적 연구: 에스니시티와 다문화주의의 통함", 민주주의와 인권, 12(3), pp.445~485 (2012)
- 김기현, "국제결혼 다문화 이주여성의 인권보호방안", 인권복지연구, pp.1~37 (2009)
- 2009년 전국 다문화가족 실태조사 연구, "김승권", 보건복지부, 법무부, 여성부, 한국보건사회연구원, ~ (2010)
- 김재련, "왜 대한민국 남성과 결혼하려는가?: 국제결혼 중개업의 문제점 및 결혼이주여성 인권강화 대책", 공익과 인권, 9, pp.40~64 (2011)
- 김종세, "다문화가족의 의의와 규범적 근거에 관한 소고", 법학연구, 37, pp.1~19 (2010)
- 문성원, "개인적 인권과 집단적 인권: 자유주의 인권개념의 한계를 넘어서, In 동아시아 인권의 새로운 탐색", pp.13~29 (2002), 삼인
- 서보건, "다문화가족통합을 위한 법제 연구 -한일비교-", 공법학연구, 11(1), pp.77~105 (2010), 한국비교공법학회
- 서원상, "다문화사회의 법적 기반에 관한 소고 －국제인권법을 중심으로－", 법학연구, 21(1), pp.161~190 (2011), 법학연구원
- 다문화 인권정책에 대한 이주민 당사자 정책 수요조사 연구보고서, "성상환", 국가인권위원회, ~ (2011)
- 양천수, "다문화시대의 인권법 정책: 대구 경북의 인권법 조례정책을 예로 하여", 영남법학, 31, pp.1~22 (2010)
- 유홍림, "인권의 보편성 문제", 민주주의와 인권, 1(1), pp.75~103 (2001)
- 이경수, "다문화인의 인권과 정상화 정책에 관한 연구", 한국행정사학지, 30, pp.32~49 (2012)
- 이경희, "다문화가족지원법의 문제점과 개선방향 - 다문화가족의 정의 및 범위를 중심으로 -", 법학논고, (32), pp.509~536 (2010), 법학연구원
- 이상논, "인권법" (2006), 세창출판사
- 장복희, "국제법상 소수자 보호", 국제인권법, 4, pp.31~58 (2001)
- 전영평, "다문화시대의 소수자운동과 소수자행정: 담론과 과제", 한국행정학보, 42(3), pp.9~27 (2008)
- 정도희, "한국의 결혼이주여성 인권보호를 위한 제언", 법학연구, 15(2), pp.31~57 (2012)
- 정성훈, "보편적 인권 정당화의 위기와 인권도시의 과제", 민주주의와 인권, 27(3), pp.381~403 (2012)
- 조경란, "중국적 인권의 개념화에 대한 사상적 시론, In 동아시아인권의 새로운 탐색", pp.142~143 (2002), 삼인
- 최성환, "다문화주의와 인권의 문제-문화 상대주의와 보편주의의 경계에서-", 철학탐구, 30, pp.348~388 (2011), 중앙철학연구소
- 탤벗, "인권의 발견" (2011), 한길사
- "2011년 다문화인구동태" (2011)[URL]
- 표명환, "재한 결혼이주여성의 국가적 보호에 관한 법적 고찰", 공법학연구, 10(3), pp.97~120 (2009), 한국비교공법학회
- 한희원, "국제인권법원론" (2012), 삼영사
- 헌트, "인권의 발명" (2009), 돌베개
- 형근혜, "결혼이주 여성에 대한 법적 권리 비교연구: 가족법과 국적법을 중심으로", 인권복지연구, 9, pp.69~102 (2011)
- 홍성필, "국제인권과 결혼 이주", 저스티스, 98, pp.27~42 (2006)
- 예링, "권리를 위한 투쟁" (1991), 범우사
- Dembour, M. B., "Human Right Talk And Anthropological Ambivalence" (1996), Routledge
- Kymlicka, W., "Individual Rights And Collective Rights, In Multicultural citizenship", pp.34~48 (1995), Clarendon Press
- Okin, S. M., "Is Multiculturalism Bad For Women?" (1999), Princeton University Press
- "동아일보", ~
- "UN Human Rights"[URL]