본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

한글판 펜실베니아 걱정 질문지의 탐색적 및 확인적 요인 분석

Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Korean version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire

1

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정신과학

초록

Objective : This study evaluated the factor structure of a Korean version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (K-PSWQ) with exploratory factor analysis in healthy adult subjects, and confirmatory factor analysis of subjects who have received psychiatric treatment. Methods : Exploratory principal component analysis was conducted with data from 318 non-psychiatric subjects, and 118 psychiatric patients were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis (maximum likelihood estimation). Participants were voluntary visitors at the booth who agreed to undergo screening for anxiety disorder at 2013 & 2014 Korea Mental Health Exhibitions. Results : Exploratory analysis revealed a two factor structure of the scale with total variance of 56.3%. Factor 1 was considered ‘Worry engagement’, and factor 2 was considered ‘Absence of worry’. However, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis supported that both one factor model with method factor and two factor model are fit to structure of the scale considering fit indices. Internal consistency of total questions was good (Cronbach’s α=0.899). Conclusion : Our results supported the previously suggested factor structure of the PSWQ, and proved factorial validity of the K-PSWQ in both populations. (Anxiety and Mood 2017;13(2):86-92)

Abstract

Objective : This study evaluated the factor structure of a Korean version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (K-PSWQ) with exploratory factor analysis in healthy adult subjects, and confirmatory factor analysis of subjects who have received psychiatric treatment. Methods : Exploratory principal component analysis was conducted with data from 318 non-psychiatric subjects, and 118 psychiatric patients were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis (maximum likelihood estimation). Participants were voluntary visitors at the booth who agreed to undergo screening for anxiety disorder at 2013 & 2014 Korea Mental Health Exhibitions. Results : Exploratory analysis revealed a two factor structure of the scale with total variance of 56.3%. Factor 1 was considered ‘Worry engagement’, and factor 2 was considered ‘Absence of worry’. However, the results of the confirmatory factor analysis supported that both one factor model with method factor and two factor model are fit to structure of the scale considering fit indices. Internal consistency of total questions was good (Cronbach’s α=0.899). Conclusion : Our results supported the previously suggested factor structure of the PSWQ, and proved factorial validity of the K-PSWQ in both populations. (Anxiety and Mood 2017;13(2):86-92)

참고문헌 (23)

  1. Spitzer RL, "A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7", Arch Intern Med, 166(10), pp.1092~1097 (2006)
  2. Newman MG, "Preliminary reliability and validity of the Generalized Anxiety Disorder Questionnaire-IV : A revised self-report diagnostic 0measure of generalized anxiety disorder", Behav Ther, 33, pp.215~233 (2009)
  3. Meyer TJ, "Development and validation of the Penn state worry questionnaire", Behav Res Ther, 28, pp.487~495 (1990)
  4. Brown TA, "Psychometric properties of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire in a clinical anxiety disorders sample", Behav Res Ther, 30, pp.33~37 (1992)
  5. Brown TA., "Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire: multiple factors or method effects?", Behav Res Ther, 41, pp.1411~1426 (2003)
  6. Hazlett-Stevens H, "Factor structure of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire : examination of a method factor", Assessment, 31, pp.387~401 (2004)
  7. Fresco DM, "Confirmatory factor analysis of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire", Behav Res Ther, 40, pp.313~323 (2002)
  8. Meloni F, "Assessment wording effects in the Italian version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire", Clin Psychol Psychother, 8, pp.282~287 (2001)
  9. Stöber J, "Worry : a comparison of three questionnaires for the measurement of general worries", J Indiv Differ, 16, pp.50~63 (1995)
  10. Van Rijsoort S, "The Penn State Worry Questionnaire and the Worry Domains Questionnaire: structure, reliability and validity", Clin Psychol Psychother, 6, pp.297~307 (1999)
  11. Carter MM, "Factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire:differences between African-American and White-American college students", J Anxiety Dis, 19, pp.827~843 (2005)
  12. Lim, "The Penn State Worry Questionnaire : Psychometric properties of the Korean version", Depress Anxiety, 25, pp.97~103 (2008)
  13. 최강록, "2013년 정신건강박람회 불안 장애 선별검사 결과", 대한불안의학회지, 9(2), pp.147~153 (2013), 대한불안의학회
  14. Kim JW, "Intolerance of uncertainty and problem orientation in worry", Paper presented at annual convention of the Korean Psychological Association (1998)
  15. Kaiser HF, "A note on Guttman's lower bound for the number of common factors", Br J Stat Psychol, 14, pp.1~2 (1961)
  16. Mulaik SA, "Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models", Psychol Bull, 105, pp.430~ (1989)
  17. Widaman, "Hierarchically nested covariance structure models for multitrait-multimethod data", Appl Psychol Meas, 9, pp.1~26 (1985)
  18. Cattell RB, "The scree test for the number of factors", Multivariate Behav Res, 1, pp.245~276 (1966)
  19. Castillo C, "Psychometric properties and latent structure of the Portuguese version of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire", Span J Psychol, 13, pp.431~443 (2010)
  20. Spector PE, "When two factors don’t reflect two constructs : How item characteristics can produce artifactual factors", J Manag, 1, pp.659~677 (1997)
  21. Woods CM, "Careless responding to reverse-worded items : implications for confirmatory factor analysis", J Psychopathol Behav Assess, 28, pp.186~191 (2006)
  22. Kessler RC, "Lifetime and 12-month prevalence of DSM-III-R psychiatric disorders in the United States : results from the National Comorbidity Survey", Arch Gen Psychiatry, 51, pp.8~19 (1994)
  23. 조맹제, "Prevalence and Correlates of DSM-IV Mental Disorders in South Korean Adults: The Korean Epidemiologic Catchment Area Study 2011", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 12(2), pp.164~170 (2015), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Health Anxiety QuestionnaireHye-Jin Lee, Kyu-Sic Hwang, Sang-Yeol Lee, Seung-Ho Jang대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2018 · 제15권 제10호한국판 Beck Anxiety Inventory의 요인구조: 정신과 환자를 대상으로 한 확인적 요인분석의 적용김상훈, 김학렬, 박상학, 조용래, 한은경한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2003 · 제22권 제1호개정된 한국판 불안통제 질문지의 요인구조: 임상, 비임상표본간 형태 및 측정동일성 검증오강섭, 오윤희한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2009 · 제28권 제4호Bifactor 모형을 적용한 한국판 Beck Anxiety Inventory(K-BAI) 요인구조 검증: 정신건강의학과 환자를 대상으로이남영, 이예진, 현명호한국임상심리학회 · 한국심리학회지: 임상심리 연구와 실제2025 · 제11권 제3호Screening Tool for Anxiety Disorders: Development and Validation of the Korean Anxiety Screening Assessment이승환, Cho Long Kim, Gyeongcheol Cho, Kee-Hong Choi, Kiho Park, Seung Yeon Baik, Shin-Hyang Kim, Sooyun Jung, Won-Hye Lee, Yeonsoo Park, Yeseul Kim, Younyoung Choi대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2018 · 제15권 제11호범불안장애 환자와 일반인의 걱정 내용 및 심각도의 비교김대호, 김휘곤, 서호준, 오대영, 채정호, 허휴정대한불안의학회 · 대한불안의학회지2015 · 제11권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)