본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Health Anxiety Questionnaire

2

조회

0

다운로드

2

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정신과학

초록

Objective Health anxiety can be defined by concern about health in the absence of a pathology. The Health Anxiety Questionnaire (HAQ) based on the cognitive-behavioral model can be useful for evaluating the severity and the structure of health anxiety. This study aims to verify the reliability and validity of Korean version of HAQ (K-HAQ). Methods For reliability, test-retest reliability and internal consistency were analyzed. For construct validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the optimal cut-off score. Results Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92, and r value of test-retest reliability was 0.84. In the EFA, 4- and 5-factor model showed cumulative percentile of variance of 60% or more. In the CFA, the 4-factor model was found to be the most appropriate and simplest (χ2=397.33, df=187, CFI=0.909, TLI=0.888, RMSEA=0.077). In the ROC analysis, the cut-off score was 20 points. Conclusion It is expected that K-HAQ can be helpful to evaluate the severity of health anxiety and make therapeutic plans because KHAQ can help explore the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral structure of health anxiety by each factor.

Abstract

Objective Health anxiety can be defined by concern about health in the absence of a pathology. The Health Anxiety Questionnaire (HAQ) based on the cognitive-behavioral model can be useful for evaluating the severity and the structure of health anxiety. This study aims to verify the reliability and validity of Korean version of HAQ (K-HAQ). Methods For reliability, test-retest reliability and internal consistency were analyzed. For construct validity, exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) were conducted. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to identify the optimal cut-off score. Results Cronbach’s alpha was 0.92, and r value of test-retest reliability was 0.84. In the EFA, 4- and 5-factor model showed cumulative percentile of variance of 60% or more. In the CFA, the 4-factor model was found to be the most appropriate and simplest (χ2=397.33, df=187, CFI=0.909, TLI=0.888, RMSEA=0.077). In the ROC analysis, the cut-off score was 20 points. Conclusion It is expected that K-HAQ can be helpful to evaluate the severity of health anxiety and make therapeutic plans because KHAQ can help explore the cognitive, emotional, and behavioral structure of health anxiety by each factor.

참고문헌 (27)

  1. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Satistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth ed (DSM-5)" (2013)
  2. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth ed Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR), "American Psychiatric Association", American Psychiatric Pub, ~ (2000)
  3. Proust M, "Overview: hypochondriasis, bodily complaints, and so-matic styles", Am J Psychiatry, 140, pp.273~283 (1983)[DOI]
  4. Pilowsky I, "Dimensions of hypochondriasis", Br J Psychiatry, 113, pp.89~93 (1967)[DOI]
  5. Kellner R, "Hypochondriasis and somatization", JAMA, 258, pp.2718~2722 (1987)[DOI]
  6. Kellner R, "Abridged Manual of the Illness Attitude Scales", Department of Psychiatry, School of Medicine, pp.1987
  7. Williams JMG, "Cognitive Psychology and Emotional Disorders" (1988), John Wiley & Sons
  8. Hadjistavropoulos HD, "Exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic investigations of the Illness Attitudes Scale in a nonclinical sample", Behav Res Ther, 37, pp.671~684 (1999)[DOI]
  9. Barsky AJ, "A cognitive-educational treatment for hypochondriasis", Gen Hosp Psychiatry, 10, pp.322~327 (1988)[DOI]
  10. Min Kuk Kim, "Impact of Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy on Intolerance of Uncertainty in Patients with Panic Disorder", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 13(2), pp.196~202 (2016), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
  11. 설순호, "Internet-Based Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in Korea", PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION, 13(4), pp.373~382 (2016), 대한신경정신의학회[DOI]
  12. Salkovskis PM, "Morbid preoccupations, health anxiety and reassurance: a cognitive-behavioural approach to hypochondriasis", Behav Res Ther, 24, pp.597~602 (1986)[DOI]
  13. Hedman E, "Exposure- based cognitive-behavioural therapy via the internet and as bibliotherapy for somatic symptom disorder and illness anxiety disorder: randomised controlled trial", Br J Psychiatry, 209, pp.407~413 (2016)[DOI]
  14. Newby JM, "Pilot trial of a therapist-supported internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy program for health anxiety", Internet Interv, 6, pp.71~79 (2016)[DOI]
  15. Lucock MP, "The health anxiety questionnaire", Br J Health Psychol, 1, pp.137~150 (1996)[DOI]
  16. Beck AT, "Anxiety Disorders and Phobias: A Cognitive Perspective" (2005), Basic Books
  17. Warwick HM, "Hypochondriasis", Behav Res Ther, 28, pp.105~117 (1990)[DOI]
  18. 이인혜, "질병태도 척도의 요인구조: 대학생을 중심으로", 한국심리학회지: 건강, 9(1), pp.203~218 (2004), 한국건강심리학회
  19. Morey LC, "The Personality Assessment Inventory Manual" (1991), Psychological Assessment Resources
  20. Cohen J, "Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences" (1988), L. Erlbaum Associates
  21. Kim YH, "The Korean Personality Assessment Inventory Manual" (2001), Hakjisa
  22. Hu Lt, "Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives", Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 6, pp.1~55 (1999)[DOI]
  23. Mulaik SA, "Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models", Psychol Bull, 105, pp.430~445 (1989)[DOI]
  24. Browne MW, "Alternative ways of assessing model fit", Sociol Methods Res, 21, pp.230~258 (1992)[DOI]
  25. Kaiser HF, "An index of factorial simplicity", Psychometrika, 39, pp.31~36 (1974)[DOI]
  26. Mulaik SA, "Parsimony and Model Evaluation", J Experiment Educ, 66, pp.266~273 (1998)[DOI]
  27. Bewick V, "Statistics review 12: survival analysis", Critic Care, 8, pp.389~ (2004)[DOI]

관련 논문AI추천

Screening Tool for Anxiety Disorders: Development and Validation of the Korean Anxiety Screening Assessment이승환, Cho Long Kim, Gyeongcheol Cho, Kee-Hong Choi, Kiho Park, Seung Yeon Baik, Shin-Hyang Kim, Sooyun Jung, Won-Hye Lee, Yeonsoo Park, Yeseul Kim, Younyoung Choi대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2018 · 제15권 제11호Psychometric Properties of the Beck Anxiety Inventory in the Community-dwelling Sample of Korean Adults김지혜, 이은호, 이한경, 홍상황, 황순택한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2016 · 제35권 제4호Korean Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3: Its Factor Structure, Reliability, and Validity in Non-Clinical Samples김지혜, 임영진대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2012 · 제9권 제1호한글판 펜실베니아 걱정 질문지의 탐색적 및 확인적 요인 분석김대호, 김은경, 노성원, 전준원대한불안의학회 · 대한불안의학회지2017 · 제13권 제2호The Korean Version of Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Psychometric Validation in the Korean PopulationChoi Hye-Ji, Hong Jeongwan, Hwang Kyu-Sic, Jang Seung-Ho, Lee Hye-Jin, Lee Sang-Yeol, Park Min-Cheol, Yang Chan-Mo대한신경정신의학회 · PSYCHIATRY INVESTIGATION2021 · 제18권 제4호한국판 Beck Anxiety Inventory의 요인구조: 정신과 환자를 대상으로 한 확인적 요인분석의 적용김상훈, 김학렬, 박상학, 조용래, 한은경한국임상심리학회 · Korean Journal of Clinical Psychology2003 · 제22권 제1호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)