본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

외상후 스트레스장애의 평가 도구

Assessment Instruments for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

2

조회

0

다운로드

4

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류정신과학

초록

Even experienced clinicians have difficulties in diagnosing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exactly,due to its diverse clinical features, which vary according to individuals, traumas, and various comorbid psychopathologies,and its related compensation issues. It is usually mandatory for clinicians and researchers to use screening and assessment tools when diagnosing and evaluating PTSD. To date, research has developed numerous PTSD screening and assessment tools;therefore one of the cardinal issues is to select the best of the various tools, the one most suitable for the clinician’s or researcher’s purposes. This article reviews several currently-available subjective and objective instruments for the diagnosis and evaluation of PTSD and groups them according to whether they are Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders-Correspondent Measures;PTSD-Focused, Non-DSM-Correspondent Measures;or Empirically Derived Measures. We present the instruments’ psychometric properties and scoring methods and describe their merits and weak points, focusing on their practical usage.

Abstract

Even experienced clinicians have difficulties in diagnosing posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) exactly,due to its diverse clinical features, which vary according to individuals, traumas, and various comorbid psychopathologies,and its related compensation issues. It is usually mandatory for clinicians and researchers to use screening and assessment tools when diagnosing and evaluating PTSD. To date, research has developed numerous PTSD screening and assessment tools;therefore one of the cardinal issues is to select the best of the various tools, the one most suitable for the clinician’s or researcher’s purposes. This article reviews several currently-available subjective and objective instruments for the diagnosis and evaluation of PTSD and groups them according to whether they are Diagnostic and Statistical Manual for Mental Disorders-Correspondent Measures;PTSD-Focused, Non-DSM-Correspondent Measures;or Empirically Derived Measures. We present the instruments’ psychometric properties and scoring methods and describe their merits and weak points, focusing on their practical usage.

참고문헌 (39)

  1. Yehuda R, "Post-traumatic stress disorder", N Engl J Med, 346, pp.108~114 (2002)
  2. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th ed" (1994), American Psychiatric Association Press
  3. Trimble MR, "Post-traumatic neurosis: From railway spine to the whiplash" (1981), John Wiley
  4. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 1st ed" (1952), American Psychiatric Association Press
  5. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 2nd ed" (1968), American Psychiatric Association Press
  6. "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed" (1980), American Psychiatric Association Press
  7. American Psychiatric Association, "Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 3rd ed. revised version" (1987), American Psychiatric Association Press
  8. First MB, "Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders, Clinician Version (SCID-CV)" (1997), American Psychiatric Association Press
  9. Robins LN, "Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV. St" (1995), Washington University Press
  10. Foa EB, "Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder", J Trauma Stress, 6, pp.459~473 (1993)
  11. Davidson JRT, "Validity and reliability of the DSM-III criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder", J Nerv Ment Dis, 177, pp.336~341 (1989)
  12. Davidson JRT, "Structured interview for PTSD (SIP): psychometric validation for DSM-IV criteria", Depress Anxiety, 5, pp.127~129 (1997)
  13. Kim W, "Psychometic validation of the Korean version of Structured Interview for Post-traumatic stress disorder (K-SIP)", J Kor Med Sci. In press
  14. Connor KM, "SPRINT: a brief global assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder", Int Clin Psychopharmacol, 16, pp.279~284 (2001)
  15. Kim TS, "Psychometric properties of the Korean version of the Short Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Rating Interview (K-SPRINT)", Psychiatry Clin Neurosci, 62, pp.34~39 (2008)
  16. Watson CG, "The PTSD interview: rationale, description, reliability, and concurrent validity of a DSM-III-based technique", J Clin Psychol, 7, pp.179~188 (1991)
  17. Blake DD, "The development of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale", J Trauma Stress, 8, pp.75~90 (1995)
  18. Weathers FW, "Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale: A review of the first ten years of research", Depress Anxiety, 13, pp.132~156 (2001)
  19. Lee BY, "A Reliability and Validity Study of a Clinician-Administered PTSD Scale", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 38, pp.514~522 (1999)
  20. Weathers FW, "Psychometric review of the PTSD Checklist. In: Psychometric Review of the PTSD Checklist" (1996), Sidran Press
  21. Ruggiero KJ, "Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version", J Trauma Stress, 16, pp.495~502 (2003)
  22. Smith MY, "Validation of the PTSD Checklist-Civilian version in survivors of bone marrow transplantation", J Trauma Stress, 12, pp.485~499 (1999)
  23. Blanchard EB, "Psychometric properties of the PTSD Checklist (PCL)", Behav Res Ther, 34, pp.669~673 (1996)
  24. Foa EB, "Reliability and validity of a brief instrument for assessing post-traumatic stress disorder", J Trauma Stress, 6, pp.459~473 (1993)
  25. Hendrix CC, "Validation of the Purdue Post-Traumatic Stress Scale on a sample of Vietnam veterans", J Trauma Stress, 7, pp.311~318 (1994)
  26. Foa EB, "The validation of a self-report measure of posttraumatic stress disorder: The Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale", Psychol Assess, 9, pp.445~451 (1997)
  27. Davidson JRT, "Assessment of a new self-rating scale for post-traumatic stress disorder", Psychol Med, 27, pp.153~160 (1997)
  28. Seo HJ, "Reliability and validity of the Korean version of the Davidson Trauma Scale", Compr Psychiatry, 49, pp.313~318 (2008)
  29. Horowitz M, "Impact of Event Scale: a measure of subjective stress", Psychosom Med, 41, pp.209~218 (1979)
  30. Weiss DS, "The Impact of Event Scale-Revised In : The Impact of Event Scale-Revised" (1996), Guilford Press
  31. Yi SM, "A Study of Reliability and Validity on the Korean Version of Impact of Event Scale", J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc, 38, pp.501~513 (1999)
  32. Lim HK, "Reliability and validity of the Korean version of Impact of Event Scale- Revised (IES-R-K)", Compr Psychiatry, 50, pp.385~390 (2009)
  33. ane TM, "Mississippi Scale for Combat-Related Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: three studies in reliability and validity", J Consult Clin Psychol, 56, pp.85~90 (1988)
  34. Hammarberg M, "Penn Inventory for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Psychometric properties", Psychol Assess, 4, pp.67~76 (1992)
  35. Keane TM, "Empirical development of an MMPI subscale for the assessment of combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder", J Consult Clin Psychol, 52, pp.888~891 (1984)
  36. Schlenger WE, "Performance of the Keane-Fairbank MMPIScale and other self-report measures in identifying posttraurnaric stressdisorder" (1987), Paper presented at the meeting of the American PsychologicalAssociation
  37. Litz BT, "Similaritiesand differences between MMPI and MMPI-2 applications tothe assessment of posttraumatic stress disorder", J Pers Assess, 57, pp.238~253 (1991)
  38. Derogatis LR, "SCL-90-R administration, scoring and procedures manual-II for the revised version" (1983), Clinical Psychometric Research
  39. Arata CM, "Concurrent validity of a Crime-Related Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder scale for women withinthe Symptom Checklist-90-Revised", Violence Vict, 6, pp.191~199 (1991)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (8건)