백불암의 『부인동동약』과 관련된 향촌 규범에 대한 연구
A Study on Baek-Bul-Am's Norm for Country Management
0
조회
0
다운로드
6
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The objective of this paper is to look into Baek-Bul-Am(Choi-Heung-Won, 百弗庵, 崔興遠 1705~1786)'s the Norm(規範), which he presented on the basis of Confucianism for the purpose of constructing Buindong-Dong village as a paradise. Baek-Bul-Am's attention was paid to setting up behaviour patterns for enhancement of ‘moral dignity’, ‘common value’ and ‘exemplary legislative custom’ which were thought to be the most important points needed for the society of clan and country as a confucian utopia. This paper discusses 7 items of the Norm for management of the country and analyzes ‘Enforcing Background of the Norm’, ‘Edification(敎化) and Economic Norm’, ‘The Extent of Knowledge of Norm’ and ‘Functional Features of the Self-Governing Community’. The Norm contains 5 distinctive features as follows. First, his enforcing Buindong-Dongyak(夫仁洞洞約) was motivated by the belief that through filial piety and brotherly love(孝悌之道) the people could enjoy an age of peace(太平聖代). This showed a phase of the Joseon society. Second, he adopted the policy of ‘wealth first and edification next(先富後敎)’ and ‘public first and private next’(先公後私) to acquire the steady stability of farming area. At the initial stage of Dongyak(洞約), he thought that management of the country would be possible with the edification(敎化) only, but soon realized that the effect of edification(敎化) could not be acquired without solving problems concerning economic welfare. Therefore, he adopted fraternity systems such as Sa Chang Gae(社倉契), Sun Gong Go(先公庫) and Hyul Bin Go(恤貧庫) for the step of ‘wealth first’(先富), built the village school(講舍) and set up the regulation of village school(講舍節目) along with the assisting regulation of village school(講會時申約節目) for the step of ‘edification next’(後敎). Third, his Norm related to the country administration was presumed to be mostly influenced by Li-yi-fen-shu(理一分殊) of Chang Tsai(張載) for philosophical background and by Ban Gae Su Rok(磻溪隧錄) for practical and pragmatic background. Baek-Bul-Am's Norm showed ‘status discrimination in harmony(差等․調和)’ based on a rigid caste system, and thus was quite different from ‘unconditional unified harmony(調和)’ of the philosophy of Wang Yangming(陽明學). Fourth, Buindong-Dongyak(夫仁洞洞約) followed Jung Jun Bub(井田法) and adopted the managing ways of both private farming(私田) and public farming(公田). Baek-Bul-Am aimed to remedy excessive individualism caused by full-scale private farming system and loss of profit due to full-scale public farming under Communitarianism(共同體主義). Fifth, Buindong-Dongyak(夫仁洞洞約) is thought to have had many positive functions revitalizing the self-governing community as a self-sustaining confucian community because it had run Sun Gong Go(先公庫) and Hyul Bin Go(恤貧庫). As studied above, the Joseon Hyangyak(鄕約) had several features of ‘edification(敎化)’, ‘wealth first and edification next’(先富後敎), ‘public first and private next’(先公後私), ‘faithfulness in life(分)․job(業)․sacrificing one´s personal interest for public good(奉公)’, ‘spirit of mutual help’, ‘Jung Jun Jae(井田制)’ and so on. The Joseon Hyangyak might have survived until now, if coping with the caste system had been accomplished efficiently.
Abstract
The objective of this paper is to look into Baek-Bul-Am(Choi-Heung-Won, 百弗庵, 崔興遠 1705~1786)'s the Norm(規範), which he presented on the basis of Confucianism for the purpose of constructing Buindong-Dong village as a paradise. Baek-Bul-Am's attention was paid to setting up behaviour patterns for enhancement of ‘moral dignity’, ‘common value’ and ‘exemplary legislative custom’ which were thought to be the most important points needed for the society of clan and country as a confucian utopia. This paper discusses 7 items of the Norm for management of the country and analyzes ‘Enforcing Background of the Norm’, ‘Edification(敎化) and Economic Norm’, ‘The Extent of Knowledge of Norm’ and ‘Functional Features of the Self-Governing Community’. The Norm contains 5 distinctive features as follows. First, his enforcing Buindong-Dongyak(夫仁洞洞約) was motivated by the belief that through filial piety and brotherly love(孝悌之道) the people could enjoy an age of peace(太平聖代). This showed a phase of the Joseon society. Second, he adopted the policy of ‘wealth first and edification next(先富後敎)’ and ‘public first and private next’(先公後私) to acquire the steady stability of farming area. At the initial stage of Dongyak(洞約), he thought that management of the country would be possible with the edification(敎化) only, but soon realized that the effect of edification(敎化) could not be acquired without solving problems concerning economic welfare. Therefore, he adopted fraternity systems such as Sa Chang Gae(社倉契), Sun Gong Go(先公庫) and Hyul Bin Go(恤貧庫) for the step of ‘wealth first’(先富), built the village school(講舍) and set up the regulation of village school(講舍節目) along with the assisting regulation of village school(講會時申約節目) for the step of ‘edification next’(後敎). Third, his Norm related to the country administration was presumed to be mostly influenced by Li-yi-fen-shu(理一分殊) of Chang Tsai(張載) for philosophical background and by Ban Gae Su Rok(磻溪隧錄) for practical and pragmatic background. Baek-Bul-Am's Norm showed ‘status discrimination in harmony(差等․調和)’ based on a rigid caste system, and thus was quite different from ‘unconditional unified harmony(調和)’ of the philosophy of Wang Yangming(陽明學). Fourth, Buindong-Dongyak(夫仁洞洞約) followed Jung Jun Bub(井田法) and adopted the managing ways of both private farming(私田) and public farming(公田). Baek-Bul-Am aimed to remedy excessive individualism caused by full-scale private farming system and loss of profit due to full-scale public farming under Communitarianism(共同體主義). Fifth, Buindong-Dongyak(夫仁洞洞約) is thought to have had many positive functions revitalizing the self-governing community as a self-sustaining confucian community because it had run Sun Gong Go(先公庫) and Hyul Bin Go(恤貧庫). As studied above, the Joseon Hyangyak(鄕約) had several features of ‘edification(敎化)’, ‘wealth first and edification next’(先富後敎), ‘public first and private next’(先公後私), ‘faithfulness in life(分)․job(業)․sacrificing one´s personal interest for public good(奉公)’, ‘spirit of mutual help’, ‘Jung Jun Jae(井田制)’ and so on. The Joseon Hyangyak might have survived until now, if coping with the caste system had been accomplished efficiently.
참고문헌 (26)
- "正祖實錄 권48, 22년 무오 6월 3일", ~
- 崔興遠, "百弗庵先生文集 1책, 경주최씨칠계파종중", pp.535~549 (1999), 대보사
- 崔興遠, "百弗庵先生言行錄 1책, 경주최씨칠계파종중" (1999), 대보사
- 崔興遠, "(국역)백불암선생문집", pp.12~399 (2002), 대보사
- 崔興遠, "(국역)백불암선생언행록", pp.20~254 (2002), 대보사
- 최동집, "(國譯)臺巖先生文集", pp.218~222 (2002), 대보사
- 百弗庵派 宗中, "옻골 경주최씨 백불암종가 소장 문적 유물목록" (2005)
- 民族文化推進會, "百弗菴集", pp.128~ (1999), 코리아 헤럴드
- 한국문집편찬위원회, "百弗菴先生文集", pp.388~ (1987), 경인출판사
- 崔興璧, "山中問答 in:蠹窩先生文集(영인본)", 계명대소장본, ~, 년대 미상
- 金光彦, "百弗古宅", pp.52~53 (2008), 민속원
- 김종권, "명가의 가훈", pp.403~406 (1982), 가정문고사
- 김용섭, "조선후기 농업사연구", pp.577~603 (2005), 지식산업사
- 崔誡, "台洞先生實紀", pp.61~64 (1996), 족문사
- 곽효문, "朝鮮朝 鄕約의 福祉行政機能과 意義", 행정논총, 41(1), pp.23~45 (2003), 한국행정연구소
- 김무진, "조선시대 향약 및 향안 조직에서의 의사 결정 구조", 한국학 논집, 32, pp.79~114 (2005), 계명대학교 한국학연구소
- 김신열, "栗谷의 鄕約을 통해 본 地域社會福祉 實踐의 意味", 유교사상연구, (37), pp.67~88 (2009), 한국유교학회
- 金仁杰, "조선후기 향권의 추이와 지배층동향", 한국문화, 2, pp.167~250 (1981), 서울대학교 한국문화연구소
- 이근영, "朱熹의 <增損呂氏鄕約>과 朝鮮社會 ― 朝鮮鄕約의 特性에 대한 檢討를 중심으로", 중국학보, 45, pp.275~294 (2002), 한국중국학회
- 장재천, "조선시대 향약의 정치적 이념과 도덕 공동체 의식 강화", 인문사회논총, (14), pp.1~21 (2007), 용인대학교 인문사회과학연구소
- 鄭震英, "朝鮮後期 鄕約의 一 硏究~夫仁洞 洞約을 중심으로", 민족문화논총, 2, pp.311~331 (1982), 영남대학교 민족문화연구소
- 鄭震英, "百弗庵 崔興遠의 學問과 鄕約", 韓國의 哲學, (29), pp.87~ (2001), 慶北大學校 退溪硏究所
- 최문형, "栗谷鄕約의 現代的 照明- 共同體主義와 관련하여 -", 동양철학연구, 30, pp.27~52 (2002), 동양철학연구회
- 최언돈, "백불암의 족내(族內) 관련 규범(規範)", 퇴계학논집, (5), pp.441~509 (2009), 영남퇴계학연구원
- 최재석, "친족제도", pp.444~ (2001), 고려대 민족문화연구원
- 하영휘, "최흥원의 학문과 사회경제사상", 석사, pp.1990
