본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

조선조에서의 향약(鄕約)과 향속(鄕俗)의 연구 -관습법의 존재 양식을 찾아서-

A Study of Local Convention (hyangyak) and Local Custom in the Chosun Dynasty: In Search of the Types of Conventional Law

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

초록

[1] The Koreans, having not gone beyond the age of feudalism and with no local autonomous experience, lacked the opportunity to train themselves in civic consciousness. Because of this, Local Convention (hyangyak) in the age of the Chosun Dynasty was a significant mechanism in sustaining social order and the public good by playing the role of conventional law. [2] Local Convention, which was composed of four principles, (1) the mutual encouragement of virtues, (2) the mutual control of personal faults, (3) the mutual exchange of social courtesy and (4) mutual assistance in hardship, was a type of autonomous regulation at the local civic level apart from governmental powers. It contributed to the evolution and development of local communities and was passed down as a means of solving social conflict that could not be governed by the official authority. It also was imbued with the meaning of local autonomy. [3] At the beginning stage of Local Convention in the early sixteenth century, the ruling class of the Chosun Dynasty wished to cultivate the people they governed by Confucian doctrine through Local Convention. For this purpose, Lee Hwang and Lee Yool-gok led its establishment. When, however, the local gentry attempted to form a potential group and grew as a resisting organization, the ruling class began to regret its support and looked for ways to suppress the growing resistance. In some respects, abusive activities of the gentry was responsible for this reaction. [4] As Local Convention was an idea, local customs such as doorae (cooperative farming), poomasy (exchange of farming labor), folk festivals and gyee (mutual assistance unions) were the fruits of these ideas. In pre-modern society, with a rudimentary monetary system and lack of a social safety net, the Local Convention gave vitality to the enhancement of the local identity and a sense of common solidarity in rural society. The Local Convention was in essence civilian regulation based on the Confucian spirit to give mutual assistance. Its core value was common and mutual existence.

Abstract

[1] The Koreans, having not gone beyond the age of feudalism and with no local autonomous experience, lacked the opportunity to train themselves in civic consciousness. Because of this, Local Convention (hyangyak) in the age of the Chosun Dynasty was a significant mechanism in sustaining social order and the public good by playing the role of conventional law. [2] Local Convention, which was composed of four principles, (1) the mutual encouragement of virtues, (2) the mutual control of personal faults, (3) the mutual exchange of social courtesy and (4) mutual assistance in hardship, was a type of autonomous regulation at the local civic level apart from governmental powers. It contributed to the evolution and development of local communities and was passed down as a means of solving social conflict that could not be governed by the official authority. It also was imbued with the meaning of local autonomy. [3] At the beginning stage of Local Convention in the early sixteenth century, the ruling class of the Chosun Dynasty wished to cultivate the people they governed by Confucian doctrine through Local Convention. For this purpose, Lee Hwang and Lee Yool-gok led its establishment. When, however, the local gentry attempted to form a potential group and grew as a resisting organization, the ruling class began to regret its support and looked for ways to suppress the growing resistance. In some respects, abusive activities of the gentry was responsible for this reaction. [4] As Local Convention was an idea, local customs such as doorae (cooperative farming), poomasy (exchange of farming labor), folk festivals and gyee (mutual assistance unions) were the fruits of these ideas. In pre-modern society, with a rudimentary monetary system and lack of a social safety net, the Local Convention gave vitality to the enhancement of the local identity and a sense of common solidarity in rural society. The Local Convention was in essence civilian regulation based on the Confucian spirit to give mutual assistance. Its core value was common and mutual existence.

참고문헌 (42)

  1. "經筵日記", ~
  2. "高麗史", ~
  3. "鳩林大同契誌, 구림대동계", ~ (2004)
  4. "孟子", ~
  5. "牧民心書", ~
  6. "磻溪隨錄", ~
  7. 石洲遺稿, "附錄 先府君遺事" (1998), 뿌리출판사
  8. "宣祖修正實錄", ~
  9. "宣祖實錄", ~
  10. "成宗實錄", ~
  11. "星湖先生文集", ~
  12. "小學", ~
  13. "宋史 列傳", ~
  14. "煙藜室記述", ~
  15. "栗谷全書", ~
  16. "臨瀛大君 英陽君派 宗契 規則", ~ (1910)
  17. "朱子增損 呂氏鄕約諺解" (1978), 태학사
  18. "中宗實錄", ~
  19. "太宗實錄", ~
  20. "退溪集", ~
  21. "八谷先生集", ~
  22. 金龍德, "鄕廳硏究" (1978), 한국연구원
  23. 백남운, "향약의 부활에 대하여", 백남운전집, (4) (1932), 이론과 실천
  24. 신복룡, "한국사 새로 보기" (2001), 풀빛
  25. 吳知泳, ", 東學農民戰爭史料大系(1)" (1994), 여강출판사
  26. 李杜鉉, "우리 나라의 문화재" (1970), 문화재관리국
  27. 이영선, "금강산건봉사사적" (2003), 동산법문
  28. 이종철, "서낭당" (1994), 대원사
  29. 장주근, "한국의 향토 신앙" (1979), 을유문화사
  30. 朱剛玄, "한국의 두레(1)" (1997), 집문당
  31. 崔在錫, "韓國 農村 社會 構造" (1975), 일지사
  32. Bock, Philip K., "Modern Cultural Anthropology: An Introduction" (1979), Alfred A. Knopf
  33. Lasswell, H. D., "Power and Society: A Framework for Political Inquiry" (1952), Routledge & Kegan Paul Ltd.
  34. Montesquieu, Baron de, "The Spirit of the Laws" (1949), Hafner Publishing Co.
  35. Van Gennep, Arnold, "The Rites of Passage" (1966), The University of Chicago Press
  36. Wittfogel, Karl A., "Oriental Despotism" (1958), Yale University Press
  37. 金烈圭, "巫俗部落祭와 그 민간 思考", 人文科學, 22 (1969), 연세대학교 인문과학연구소
  38. 김태곤, "서낭당연구. in: 漢坡 李相玉 博士 회갑기념논문집" (1970), 교문사
  39. 김필동, "조선 전기 향약의 보급과 그 사회적 의미. in: 조선 후기의 체제 위기와 사회 운동" (1989), 한국정신문화연구원
  40. 김한초, "한국 농촌부락의 공동체적 성격", 제3회 국제학술회의 (1984), 한국정신문화연구원
  41. "문화저널", 1992, ~, pp.전북문화저널사
  42. 印貞植, "두레(輪番)와 호미씻이(洗鋤宴). in: 한국의 두레(2)" (1997), 집문당

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (13건)