법적 창의성, 그리고 법학교육
Education for the Creative Lawyer
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
국내에 법학전문대학원 체제가 도입된 이래로 법학 교육의 방향이나 그 방법에 대하여 많은 논의가 펼쳐지고 있다. 필자는 이 시론에서 창의적 법률가상은 어떤 것인지, 창의적 법사고를 배양하기 위한 방법은 무엇인지 검토하였다. 창의성은 미해결의 문제에 대하여 적절한 해법을 제공하는 지적 특성이다. 새로운 창의적 법학교육은 교육환경의 전반적인 개선과 함께 권위적인 교리문답이나 형식적 법논증을 탈피하고 문제의 근원들을 자유롭게 드러내고, 인접학문이나 현장의 다양한 시각들을 수용하여 문제 상황에 응용하는 작업을 포함해야 한다. 또한 법률가의 역할을 대립적 소송구도에서의 검투사로 고정시키지 말고, 오히려 문제해결자 또는 정책결정자로서의 역할을 하도록 연습시키는 것도 필요하다. 끝으로 법적 창의성은 사회적 대의에 연루되었을 때 최선의 상태에 이르기 때문에 창의성 교육과 윤리교육을 결합시켜야 한다는 점을 강조하였다.
Abstract
A lot of academic conferences on legal education have taken place after the law school system had been adopted in Korea. There has been the commonly held view that creativity is neither possible in the sphere of law, nor teachable in the law classroom. This paper attempts to refute the common opinion, give a definition of legal creativity, and introduce the various skills for creative legal education. According to Montesquieu’s model, the legislator is the only norm creator and the interpreting judge functions as a mouth to pronounce the law. Meanwhile, it has been taken for granted that, with regard to legal creativity, there is no essential difference between legislator and interpreter, although the legislator undoubtedly has the higher altitude of discretion than the judge. Every decision-maker needs to use big or small creativity, depending on the circumstances of the pending case. Cole analyzes at the meta-level the history of the doctrine of the American free speech libertarianism with reference to Harold Bloom’s creative misleading of a novice poet to escape from the influence of an master poet. It should not be overlooked that the judge’s anxiety is quite different from the poet’s, because to be an imitator means the end of an author only to a poet, but not to a judge. Judge’s choice is to demonstrate one’s own creative greatness or to comfortably adhere to the tradition of legal precedents. Legal creativity is defined as the quality to provide an appropriate solution to the legally open questions. Creativity teaching is a cooperative process for the students to be conscious of their capabilities and to develop them way of the different creativity techniques. The law classroom should be changed into a place for free communication instead of authoritarian questioning offensive, the Socratic method in the pejorative meaning. The law curriculum and student’s performance evaluation system should be also redesigned with a view to developing professor’s and student’s creativity. Creativity education should include or be linked to humanities and legal ethics, because the legal creativity has been developed in the highest for social commitment.
참고문헌 (49)
- 드워킨, "법의 제국" (2004), 아카넷
- 라드브루흐, "법철학" (2001), 삼영사
- 리프킨, "유러피언드림" (2005), 민음사
- 벡, "지구화의 길" (2000), 거름
- 보노, "창의력 사전" (2004), 21세기북스
- 블룸, "시적 영향에 대한 불안" (1991), 고려원
- 세계화를 위한 국제포럼(IFG), "더 나은 세계는 가능하다―세계", ~
- 화, "비판을 넘어 대안으로" (2003), 필맥
- 아리스토텔레스, "니코마코스 윤리학" (2006), 이제이북스
- 이재승, "P. J. A. 포이어바흐의 법사상", 민주법학, (19) (2001)
- 요조, "법과 사회" (1992), 강원대출판부
- 장영민, "법철학 논선 I" (1999), 이화여대법학연구소
- 칸트, "칸트의 역사철학" (1992), 서광사
- 페를만, "법과 정의의 철학" (1984), 종로서적
- Alexy, Robert, "Theorie der juristischen Argumentation" (1991), Suhrkamp
- Blomquist, Robert F., "Thinking about Law and Creativity: On the 100 most creative Moments in American Law", Whittier Law Review, 30 (2008)
- Böckenförde, Ernst-Wolfgang, "Entstehung und Wandel des Rechtsstaats, Recht, Staat, Freiheit, Suhrkamp", ~ (1991)
- Brest, Paul, "Lawyer as Problem Solvers", Temple Law Review, 72 (1999)
- Chimni, B. S., "Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto", International Community Law Review, 8 (2006)
- Clarke, Cait, "Problem-Solving Defenders in the Community: Expanding the Conceptual and Institutional Boundaries of Providing Counsel to the Poor", Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 14 (2001)
- Cole, David, "Agon at Agora: Creative Misreadings in the First Amendment Tradition", Yale Law Journal, 95 (1986)
- de Bono, Edward, "Edward, Lateral Thinking: Creativity step by step" (1990), Harper Perennial
- "Away with the Gang of Three, The Guardian" (1997)[URL]
- "Lateral Thinking & Parallel Thinking"[URL]
- Ferrari, Vincenzo, "Functions of Law, in: Encyclopedia of Law & Society" (2007), SAGE
- Fuller, Lon L., "The Morality of Law" (1963), Yale University Press
- Galanter, Marc, "Predators and Parasites: Lawyer-Bashing and Civil Justice", Georgeia Law Review, 28 (1994)
- Günther, Klaus, "Der Sinn für Angemessenheit. Anwendungsdiskurse in Moral und Recht, Frankfurt", M., 1988
- Girtler, Roland, "Rechtssoziologie, Thesen und Möglichkeiten" (1976), Wilhelm Fink
- Hart, H. L. A., "Essays on Bentham" (1982), Oxford University Press
- Healy, Thomas, "Stare Decisis as a Constitutional Requirement", West Virginia Law Review, 104 (2001)
- "International Association for Impact Assessment, Power, Poverty and Sustainability: The role of impact assessment, 26th Annual Conference" (2006)[URL]
- Kant, Immanuel, "Werkausgabe Bd. Ⅷ" (1991), Suhrkamp
- Kelman, Mark, "Critical legal Studies" (1987), Harvard University Press
- Klug, Ulrich, "Juristische Logik" (1982), Springer
- Koch & Rüßmann, "Juristische Begründungslehre" (1982), Beck
- Melcher, Michael F., "The Creative Lawyer: A Practical Guide to Authentic Professional Satisfaction" (2007), ABA
- Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, "The Lawyer as Problem Solver and The Third-Party Neutral: Creativity and Non-partisanship in Lawyering", Temple Law Review, 72 (1999)
- Menkel-Meadow, Carrie, "Aha? Is Creativity Possible in Legal Problem Solving and Teachable in Legal Education?", Harvard Negotiation Law Review, 6 (2001)
- Michelson, Karin, "Rhetoric and Rage: Third World Voices in International Legal Discourse", Wisconsin International Law Journal, 16 (1998)
- Perelman, Chaim, "The New Rhetoric: A Treatise on Argumentation" (1969), University of Notre dame Press
- Rabbant, David M., "The First Amendment in its forgotten years", Yale Law Journal, 90 (1981)
- Radbruch, Gustav, "Vorschule der Rechtsphilosophie" (1947), Schreier
- Radbruch, Gustav, "Einführung in die Rechtswissenschaft" (1952), K. F. Koehler
- Rosenberry, Katharine, "Organizational Barriers to Creativity in Law Schools and the Legal Profession", California Western Law Review, 41 (2005)
- Rulli, Louis S., "Too Long Neglected: Expanding Curricular Support For Public Interest Lawyering", Cleveland State Law Review, 55 (2007)
- Schuffenhauer, Werner, "Paul Johann Anselm Ritter von Feuerbachs Leben und Wirken, Ludwig Feuerbach Gesammelte Werke 제12권" (1989), Akademie-Verlag
- Sturm, Susan P., "From Gladiators to Problem-Solvers: Connecting Conversations about Women, the Academy, and the Legal Profession", Duke Journal of Gender Law & Policy, 4 (1997)
- Weinstein, Janet, "Stuck in a Rut: The Role of Creative Thinking in Problem Solving and Legal Education", Clinical Law Review, 9 (2003)