학문적 계보와 지식권력의 상관관계 고찰을 위한 試論 —北人계열 문인들의 학문적 계보 연구 방법론을 중심으로—

Abstract

This article was written in the form of Trial Discussion to examine the correlation between academic genealogy and knowledge power by presenting a research methodology on the academic genealogy of Bukin Series writers. Accordingly, this article was conducted in a way of finding a research methodology for constant questions, largely in a way of solving two questions. Therefore, first, we tried to constantly explore the methodology of how to set the academic genealogy of Bukin Series writers. Second, we examined what kind of knowledge the Bukin Series writers acquired and how they were able to unite in the form of a school with academic homogeneity centering on such knowledge base. Therefore, in order to prepare the premise of discussion, Chapter 2 summarized the concept of knowledge power and then tried to confirm the correlation between knowledge power and academic genealogy. Here, we went beyond defining the concept of knowledge and discussed what knowledge acquired power and maintained its power by inheriting it. Knowledge is a term that can be discussed in a wide range of studies, but in this article, it is narrowed down to refer to the ideological and literary characteristics of a specific school. And we discussed how influential those schools were in reality, or how influenced other writers were. Subsequently, in Chapter 3, in order to apply the concepts proposed in Chapter 2, the work was carried out to track the genealogy of Bukin Series writers and the various aspects of knowledge power. Therefore, in Section 1, the origin of the intellectual power that the Bukin Series writers wanted to inherit was discussed, and it was confirmed that knowledge was inherited in terms of ideology and literature, mainly Nammyung and Hwadam school. Furthermore, Section 2 presented a methodology to confirm the inheritance of knowledge power by dividing the representative Bukin Series literary group and structuring the academic development pattern, and went through the process of proving validity through poetic literature. Therefore, this article can be said to be meaningful in that it laid the foundation for driving various subsequent studies by presenting a methodology to examine the correlation between academic genealogy and knowledge power.