본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

On the Role of Projected FDI Inflows in Shaping Institutions: The Longer-Term Plan for Post-Pandemic Investment Reboot

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류경제학

초록

Capital inflows have a strong presence that influences destination countries’ development of institutions, which can in turn help resuscitate a stopped economy and re-attract capital that was lost during crises such as the recent public health crisis. While the previous literature emphasizes the mechanism that foreign investors press or even threaten the local government for change, this paper explores empirically whether institutional improvement can be achieved through the channel that host countries voluntarily reform institutions in anticipation of potential investments predicted by the exogenous geographical and cultural characteristics of the recipient countries. Given that countries with better institutional quality can accumulate larger FDI stocks, we still find that the need for more FDI, in contrast to FPI and debt, gives higher incentives to host countries to strategically improve their institutions before seeking capital overseas. Moreover, the predicted FDI exerts more prominent impacts on institutions on constraining elite than those involved in launching a business, enforcing contracts, and protecting properties. The results imply that a long-run plan for upgrading elite constraint institutions is crucial for a post-pandemic FDI reboot.

Abstract

Capital inflows have a strong presence that influences destination countries’ development of institutions, which can in turn help resuscitate a stopped economy and re-attract capital that was lost during crises such as the recent public health crisis. While the previous literature emphasizes the mechanism that foreign investors press or even threaten the local government for change, this paper explores empirically whether institutional improvement can be achieved through the channel that host countries voluntarily reform institutions in anticipation of potential investments predicted by the exogenous geographical and cultural characteristics of the recipient countries. Given that countries with better institutional quality can accumulate larger FDI stocks, we still find that the need for more FDI, in contrast to FPI and debt, gives higher incentives to host countries to strategically improve their institutions before seeking capital overseas. Moreover, the predicted FDI exerts more prominent impacts on institutions on constraining elite than those involved in launching a business, enforcing contracts, and protecting properties. The results imply that a long-run plan for upgrading elite constraint institutions is crucial for a post-pandemic FDI reboot.

참고문헌 (35)

  1. Acemoglu, D., "The Colonial Origins of Comparative Development: An Empirical Investigation", American Economic Review, 91(5), pp.1369~1401 (2001)
  2. Acemoglu, D., "Unbundling Institutions", Journal of Political Economy, 113(5), pp.949~995 (2005)
  3. Acemoglu, D., "Handbook of Economic Growth. Volume 1A" (2005), North Holland
  4. Ahlquist, J. S., "FDI and the Costs of Contract Enforcement in Developing Countries", Policy Sciences, 43(2), pp.181~200 (2010)
  5. Alfaro, L., "Intra-Industry Foreign Direct Investment", American Economic Review, 99(5), pp.2096~2119 (2009)
  6. Alfaro, L., "Why Doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries? An Empirical Investigation", Review of Economics and Statistics, 90(2), pp.347~368 (2008)
  7. Ali, F. A., "Do Institutions Matter for Foreign Direct Investment?", Open Economies Review, 21, pp.201~219 (2010)
  8. Ali, F. A., "Climbing to the Top? Foreign Direct Investment and Property Rights", Economic Inquiry, 49(1), pp.289~302 (2011)
  9. Idea Flows, Economic Growth, and Trade, "Alvarez, F. E.", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper, no. 19667 (2014)
  10. Institutional Quality and Debt Relief: A Political Economy Approach, "Akoto, W.", ERSA, ~, pp.ERSA Working Paper, no. 340 (2013)
  11. Beck, T., "Law, Endowments, and Finance", Journal of Financial Economics, 70(2), pp.137~181 (2003)
  12. Financial Market and Capital Flow Dynamics during the Covid-19 Pandemic, "Beirne, J.", ADBI, ~, pp.ADBI Working Paper Series. no. 1158 (2020)
  13. Bergh, A., "Globalization and Institutional Quality- A Panel Data Analysis", Oxford Development Studies, 42(3), pp.365~394 (2014)
  14. Bhattacharyya, S., "Trade Liberalization and Institutional Development", Journal of Policy Modeling, 34(2), pp.253~269 (2012)
  15. COVID-19 and Emerging Markets: An Epidemiological Model with International Production Networks and Capital Flows, "Cakmakli, C.", IMF, ~, pp.IMF Working Paper, no. 20 (2020), 133
  16. Djankov, S., "The Regulation of Entry", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), pp.1~37 (2002)
  17. Djankov, S., "Courts", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), pp.453~517 (2003)
  18. Frankel, J. A., "Does Trade Cause Growth?", American Economic Review, 89(3), pp.379~399 (1999)
  19. Quantifying Productivity Gains from Foreign Investment, "Fons-Rosen, C.", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper, no. 18920 (2013)
  20. Polity II: Political Structure and Regime Change, 1800-1986, "Gurr, R. T.", Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research, ~, pp.ICPSR Paper no. 9263 (1990)
  21. Javorcik, B. S., "Does Foreign Direct Investment Increase the Productivity of Domestic Firms? In Search of Spillovers through Backward Linkages", American Economic Review, 94(3), pp.605~627 (2004)
  22. Intrinsic Openness and Endogenous Institutional Quality, "Jiao, Y.", NBER, ~, pp.NBER Working Paper, no. 24052 (2017)
  23. Karakas, L. D., "Institutional Constraints and the Inefficiency in Public Investments", Journal of Public Economics, 152, pp.93~101 (2017)
  24. Kingston, C., "Comparing Theories of Institutional Change", Journal of Institutional Economics, 5(2), pp.151~180 (2009)
  25. Kleinert, J., "Gravity for FDI", Review of International Economics, 18(1), pp.1~13 (2010)
  26. Composition of International Capital Flows: A Survey, "Kirabaeva, K.", HKIMR, ~, pp.HKIMR Paper, no. 14 (2011), 2011
  27. La Porta, R., "Legal Determinants of External Finance", Journal of Finance, 52(3), pp.1131~1150 (1997)
  28. Levchenko, A. A., "International Trade and Institutional Change", Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 29(5), pp.1145~1181 (2013)
  29. Long, C., "Institutional Impact of Foreign Direct Investment in China", World Development, 66, pp.31~48 (2015)
  30. Miguel, E., "Economic Shocks and Civil Conflict: An Instrumental Variables Approach", Journal of Political Economy, 112(4), pp.725~753 (2004)
  31. Moran, T., "Does Foreign Direct Investment Promote Development?" (2005), Institute for International Economics
  32. Neyapti, B., "Modeling Institutional Evolution", Economic Systems, 37(1), pp.1~16 (2013)
  33. Puga, D., "International Trade and Institutional Change: Medieval Venice’s Response to Globalization", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(2), pp.753~821 (2014)
  34. Shi, W., "Institutional Fragility and Outward Foreign Direct Investment from China", Journal of International Business Studies, 48(4), pp.452~476 (2017)
  35. COVID-19: A Triple Whammy for Emerging Market and Developing Economies, "Singh, K.", Madhyam, ~, pp.Madhyam Briefing Paper, no. 36 (2020)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)