학교특성에 따른 건강증진학교 평가
Evaluation of Health Promoting School by School Characteristics
2
조회
0
다운로드
11
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess inputs for health promoting schools (HPS) and to evaluate HPS based on WHO' s guidelines through school characteristics, and to identify the schools' need among 6 areas of HPS. Methods: A stratified and random cluster sampling design was used to obtain a cross-sectional sample. A total of 59 elementary, middle and high schools in Seoul and Gyeonggi areas were included and 333 teachers (males 40.6%, females 59.4%) participated in this survey. A self-reported questionnaire consisted of 10 items for inputs for HPS, 50 items for the evaluation of HPS and 3 items of the schools' need among 6 areas of HPS. Data were analyzed through t-test, ANOVA, and Duncan test. Results: The mean score of inputs for HPS was 48.5 (±15.3). Elementary schools had higher mean scores of inputs than middle and high schools. The mean score of schools with management committee was higher than those schools without it. The schools which had meetings on health issues had higher mean scores. For evaluation, the mean score for HPS was 76.8 (±9.4): the area of "School Physical Environment" had the highest score (80.0±10.9) and the area of "Community Relationships" had the lowest score (67.1±13.9). Elementary schools with less than 9 classes and more than 31 classes had higher HPS, so do with schools that has less than 340 students and more than 1201 students. The schools which had meetings on health issues had higher evaluation scores. The same results were found on 6 areas of HPS. The teachers responded that the areas of "School Health Policy", "The School Physical Environment", and "Health Service" should be supported among 6 areas of HPS. Conclusion: Based on these results, more concerns and supports for school health are necessary. Middle schools should give more regard on the development of HPS. For comprehensive school health promotion, all 6 areas of HPS should be equally supported.
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess inputs for health promoting schools (HPS) and to evaluate HPS based on WHO' s guidelines through school characteristics, and to identify the schools' need among 6 areas of HPS. Methods: A stratified and random cluster sampling design was used to obtain a cross-sectional sample. A total of 59 elementary, middle and high schools in Seoul and Gyeonggi areas were included and 333 teachers (males 40.6%, females 59.4%) participated in this survey. A self-reported questionnaire consisted of 10 items for inputs for HPS, 50 items for the evaluation of HPS and 3 items of the schools' need among 6 areas of HPS. Data were analyzed through t-test, ANOVA, and Duncan test. Results: The mean score of inputs for HPS was 48.5 (±15.3). Elementary schools had higher mean scores of inputs than middle and high schools. The mean score of schools with management committee was higher than those schools without it. The schools which had meetings on health issues had higher mean scores. For evaluation, the mean score for HPS was 76.8 (±9.4): the area of "School Physical Environment" had the highest score (80.0±10.9) and the area of "Community Relationships" had the lowest score (67.1±13.9). Elementary schools with less than 9 classes and more than 31 classes had higher HPS, so do with schools that has less than 340 students and more than 1201 students. The schools which had meetings on health issues had higher evaluation scores. The same results were found on 6 areas of HPS. The teachers responded that the areas of "School Health Policy", "The School Physical Environment", and "Health Service" should be supported among 6 areas of HPS. Conclusion: Based on these results, more concerns and supports for school health are necessary. Middle schools should give more regard on the development of HPS. For comprehensive school health promotion, all 6 areas of HPS should be equally supported.
참고문헌 (18)
- 교육과학기술부, "2009 학교보건급식 기본방향" (2009), 교육과학기술부
- 김영임, "학교건강증진 지표개발 및 측정에 관한 연구", 한국학교보건학회지, 11(2), pp.189~201 (1998)
- 김혜경, "<특집 건강증진정책 포럼> 건강증진사업을 위한 보건교육정책에 대한 평가와 과제 - 우리나라 학교보건교육의 현황과 과제", 보건교육·건강증진학회지, 24(5), pp.219~230 (2007), 한국보건교육·건강증진학회
- 김혜련, "아동, 청소년 건강증진사업의 과제와 발전방향: 영양, 신체활동 증진 및 비만예방을 중심으로", 보건복지포럼, 통권 : 141, pp.20~21 (2008)
- 학교 건강증진사업 평가 및 지원체계 개발, "박혜숙", 이화여자대학교. 건강증진사업단, ~ (2006)
- 보건복지가족부, "청소년 건강행태 온라인 조사", 제4차 조사 중간 결과 발표 및 청소년 건강정책 포럼 (2008), 질병관리본부, 보건복지가족부
- 손애리, "WHO 건강증진학교 평가개념을 적용한 사정 및 평가 - 양평군 초ㆍ중ㆍ고등학교별 차이 분석 -", 한국학교보건교육학회지, 9(1), pp.1~15 (2008), 한국학교보건교육학회
- 윤순녕, "초, 중, 고등학교 학생, 학부모, 일반교사의 보건교육 영영별 요구도와 보건교육", 한국학교보건학회지, 18(1), pp.1~14 (2005)
- 이은영, "건강증진학교 수행 및 효과평가", 보건교육·건강증진학회지, 26(2), pp.89~103 (2009), 한국보건교육·건강증진학회
- 이정렬, "초등학교의 학교보건정책 지침개발 및 수행정도 분석", 지역사회간호학회지, 14(3), pp.457~467 (2003)
- 장창곡, "건강한 학교 만들기 모형 개발", 한국학교보건학회지, 14(1), pp.39~46 (2001)
- Gray GI, "Developing a health‐promoting school, International Planning Committee of the European Network of Health Promoting Schools" (2006), WHO Regional Office for Europe
- Inchley J, "Becoming a health promoting school: evaluating the process of effective implementation in Scotland", Health Promotion International, 22(1), pp.65~71 (2007)
- Leger LS, "What's the place of schools in promoting health? Are we too optimistic?", Health Promotion International, 19(4), pp.405~408 (2004)
- Mukoma W, "Evaluations of health promoting schools: A review of nine studies", Health Promotion International, 19(3), pp.357~368 (2004)
- Stewart-Brown S, "What is the evidence on school health promotion in improving health or preventing disease and specifically, what is the effectiveness of the health promoting schools approach?" (2006), WHO Regional Office for Europe
- WHO, "School health promotion‐Series 5: Regional guidelines: Development of health promoting schools: A framework for action" (1996), WHO
- WHO, "Local action: Creating health promoting school. WHO's inforamtion series on school health" (2000), WHO, UNESCO, EDC