제세동 시행도구에 따른 제세동 지연시간의 변화
The Changes of Defibrillation Time Depending on the Manual External Defibrillator Device
1
조회
0
다운로드
3
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives: This study is to research delay time comparison for later defibrillation after hands off according to the changes in defibrillation electrodes. Study purpose: In defibrillation treatment that is the only way for cardiac arrest by arrhythmia, it is to find defibrillator device which can minimize late defibrillation delay time after important affect of hands off. Study object and method: After hands off according to the defibrillator device, we collected total 40 people for emergency medicine doctor, internal medicine doctor, general surgeon, nurse, emergency medical technician who are working at 2 CN, CS University hospitals in Gwangju Jeollanamdo district to find out hand off shock interval(HOSI). We then researched their general properties like occupation sector, experiences in clinic, gender, completion of AHA ACLS-P training and more. Then 40 participants continued ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest simulation training (using human-model mannequin) designed by researcher and performed their roles as defibrillation operator. Each of participant used manual paddle and performed 4 times of defibrillation (150J) during 8 minutes of CPR and in 8day, the defibrillator devices were replaced from manual paddle to self-adhesive electrodes pads and 4 times of defibrillation (150J) under same simulation condition as manual paddle were performed. Study result: In comparison for delay time of later defibrillation after hands off of manual paddle and self adhesive electrodes pad, the self adhesive electrodes pad (7.0±0.5sec) seemed to reduce delay time of later defibrillation significantly (p<0.05) compared to manual paddle (10.0±0.9sec). The self adhesive electrodes pad, according to the general properties of participants, had no particular change in delay time after later defibrillation for the statistics (p>0.05) but the manual paddle had statistically significant differences for the occupation sector, experiences in clinic and gender (p<0.05). Conclusion: In defibrillation, the self adhesive electrodes pad(7.0±0.5sec) showed short HOSI compared to manual paddle (10.0±0.9sec) significantly (p<0.05) and it applied identically for both existence and non-existence of ACLS-P training completion, experiences in clinic, gender and occupation sector. The manual paddle had also significant difference in experiences in clinic and occupation sector (p<0.05). which means the effect on HOSI according to the job mastery. Therefore, if the clinic experience is short or in case for the occupations without frequent defibrillation treatment has a danger of lowering success rate for the defibrillation using manual paddle. Therefore, it is true that using self adhesive electrodes pad for defibrillation electrodes when performing manual defibrillation in pre-hospital as well as in-hospital steps can generally minimize delay time of later defibrillation after hands off.
Abstract
Objectives: This study is to research delay time comparison for later defibrillation after hands off according to the changes in defibrillation electrodes. Study purpose: In defibrillation treatment that is the only way for cardiac arrest by arrhythmia, it is to find defibrillator device which can minimize late defibrillation delay time after important affect of hands off. Study object and method: After hands off according to the defibrillator device, we collected total 40 people for emergency medicine doctor, internal medicine doctor, general surgeon, nurse, emergency medical technician who are working at 2 CN, CS University hospitals in Gwangju Jeollanamdo district to find out hand off shock interval(HOSI). We then researched their general properties like occupation sector, experiences in clinic, gender, completion of AHA ACLS-P training and more. Then 40 participants continued ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest simulation training (using human-model mannequin) designed by researcher and performed their roles as defibrillation operator. Each of participant used manual paddle and performed 4 times of defibrillation (150J) during 8 minutes of CPR and in 8day, the defibrillator devices were replaced from manual paddle to self-adhesive electrodes pads and 4 times of defibrillation (150J) under same simulation condition as manual paddle were performed. Study result: In comparison for delay time of later defibrillation after hands off of manual paddle and self adhesive electrodes pad, the self adhesive electrodes pad (7.0±0.5sec) seemed to reduce delay time of later defibrillation significantly (p<0.05) compared to manual paddle (10.0±0.9sec). The self adhesive electrodes pad, according to the general properties of participants, had no particular change in delay time after later defibrillation for the statistics (p>0.05) but the manual paddle had statistically significant differences for the occupation sector, experiences in clinic and gender (p<0.05). Conclusion: In defibrillation, the self adhesive electrodes pad(7.0±0.5sec) showed short HOSI compared to manual paddle (10.0±0.9sec) significantly (p<0.05) and it applied identically for both existence and non-existence of ACLS-P training completion, experiences in clinic, gender and occupation sector. The manual paddle had also significant difference in experiences in clinic and occupation sector (p<0.05). which means the effect on HOSI according to the job mastery. Therefore, if the clinic experience is short or in case for the occupations without frequent defibrillation treatment has a danger of lowering success rate for the defibrillation using manual paddle. Therefore, it is true that using self adhesive electrodes pad for defibrillation electrodes when performing manual defibrillation in pre-hospital as well as in-hospital steps can generally minimize delay time of later defibrillation after hands off.
참고문헌 (25)
- "WHO the top 10 causes of death 2011", ~
- 2010년 사망원인통계, , 통계청, ~
- Kim IS, "The present condition and trend of five major causes of death in Korean", Korean J Med Assoc, 38, pp.32~45 (1995)
- Suh I, "Changing pattern of cardiovascular diseases in Korea", Korean J Epidemiol, 15, pp.40~46 (1993)
- Priori SG, "Policy statement: ESC-ERC recommendations for the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) in Europe", Resuscitation, 60, pp.245~252 (2004)
- Hollenberg J, "Improved survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is associated with an increase in proportion of emergency crew? witnessed cases and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Circulation, 8, pp.389~396 (2008)
- Lund-Kordahl I, "Improving outcome after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest by strengthening weak links of the local Chain of Survival : quality of advanced life support and post-resuscitation care", Resuscitation, 81, pp.422~426 (2010)
- Iwami T, "Continuous improvements in"chain of survival"increased survival after out-of-hospital cardiac arrests : a largescale population-based study", Circulation, 119, pp.728~734 (2009)
- Rea TD, "Increasing use of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation arrest : survival implications of guideline changes", Circulation, 114, pp.2760~2765 (2006)
- Bobrow BJ, "Minimally interrupted cardiac resuscitation by emergency medical services for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest", JAMA, 299, pp.1158~1165 (2008)
- Sayre MR, "Impact of the 2005 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resus-citation and emergency cardiovascular care guidelines on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival", Prehosp Emerg Care, 13, pp.469~477 (2009)
- Steinmetz J, "Improved survival after an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest using new guidelines", Acta Anaesthesiol Scand, 52, pp.908~913 (2008)
- Hinchey PR, "Improved out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survival after the sequential implementation of 2005 AHA guidelines for com-pressions, ventilations, and induced hypothermia: the Wake County Experience", Ann Emerg Med (2010)
- Eftestol T, "Effects of interrupting precordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac Arrest", circulation, 105, pp.2270~2273 (2002)
- Ying Yu, "Adverseoutcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation", circulation, 106, pp.368~372 (2002)
- Ong ME, "Comparison of chest compression only and standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Singapore", Resuscitation, 78, pp.119~126 (2008)
- Bohm K, "Survival is similar after standard treatment and chest compression only in out-of- hospital bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation", Circulation, 116, pp.2908~2912 (2007)
- Iwami T, "Effectiveness of bystander-initiated cardiac-only resuscitation for patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest", Circulation, 116, pp.2900~2907 (2007)
- SOS-KANTO Study Group, "Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by bystanders with chest compression only (SOS-KANTO): an observational study", Lancet, 369, pp.920~926 (2007)
- Eftestol T, "Effects of interrupting precordial compressions on the calculated probability of defibrillation success during out-of-hospital cardiac Arrest", circulation, 105, pp.2270~2273 (2002)
- Ying Yu, "Adverseoutcomes of interrupted precordial compression during automated defibrillation", circulation, 106, pp.368~372 (2002)
- Sado DM, "Are European Resuscitation Council recommendations for paddle force achievable during defibrillation?", Resuscitation, 3, pp.287~290 (2001)
- Deakin CD, "Determining the optimal paddle force for external defibrillation", The American Journal of Cardiology, 90(7), pp.812~813 (2002)
- 이명훈, "우리나라 응급의료센터의 제세동시 패들-피부 결합물질 사용현황 및 결합물질의 임피던스 측정", 대한응급의학회지, 21(1), pp.125~130 (2010), 대한응급의학회
- "건강보험요양급여비용", ~ (2009)