타이완 원주민 신화의 유형별 분석 - 태아족(泰雅族), 포농족(布農族), 아미족(阿美族) 신화를 중심으로 -
Study on the myths of alpine tribes in Taiwan
1
조회
0
다운로드
8
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This paper deals with the mythic stories, especially motifs of origin of human, flood and brother-sister marriage, shooting of the sun of Ami, Ataya and Bunun tribes who belong to the majority group among Taiwanese alpine tribes, from the comparative perspective. This paper tries to further clearly investigate the mythic origin, relation & influence between tribes, universal or local common thinking way, and the unique characteristics of each tribe. As a result, we can confirm the following facts: First, the stone motif among creation mythic stories can be considered as the general type which a lot of countries preserve, and the myth of Ataya tribe contains the cosmology of sexual equality; second, the finding of the way of prosperity through the animal's teaching, the marriage of mother and son, the birth from a gourd, and the marriage of brother and sister+flood are the unique characteristics of the alpine tribes. And the concurrent shooting of the sun and the moon, and the appearance of the concept myth such as good and evil are very impressive. In terms of thought, the sexual equality, the divinity of humankind, the relation between man and nature, the existence of female founders, and the Totemism might be the representative thoughts of the alpine tribes. The relation between tribes can be organized as follows: Ataya=Truku=Kvalan, Bunun=Tsou, and Ataya=Bunun=Truku. On the other hand, Ami tribe is relatively isolated and also seems to be related to the south western minor ethnic group, Korea, and Okinawa.
Abstract
This paper deals with the mythic stories, especially motifs of origin of human, flood and brother-sister marriage, shooting of the sun of Ami, Ataya and Bunun tribes who belong to the majority group among Taiwanese alpine tribes, from the comparative perspective. This paper tries to further clearly investigate the mythic origin, relation & influence between tribes, universal or local common thinking way, and the unique characteristics of each tribe. As a result, we can confirm the following facts: First, the stone motif among creation mythic stories can be considered as the general type which a lot of countries preserve, and the myth of Ataya tribe contains the cosmology of sexual equality; second, the finding of the way of prosperity through the animal's teaching, the marriage of mother and son, the birth from a gourd, and the marriage of brother and sister+flood are the unique characteristics of the alpine tribes. And the concurrent shooting of the sun and the moon, and the appearance of the concept myth such as good and evil are very impressive. In terms of thought, the sexual equality, the divinity of humankind, the relation between man and nature, the existence of female founders, and the Totemism might be the representative thoughts of the alpine tribes. The relation between tribes can be organized as follows: Ataya=Truku=Kvalan, Bunun=Tsou, and Ataya=Bunun=Truku. On the other hand, Ami tribe is relatively isolated and also seems to be related to the south western minor ethnic group, Korea, and Okinawa.
참고문헌 (22)
- 김태곤, "한국의 무속신화", pp.13~14 (1985), 집문당
- 손진태, "한국민족설화의 연구", pp.170~171 (1954), 을유문화사
- 이명주, "한국인과 에로스", pp.31~ (1996), 지성문화사
- 김원중, "삼국유사", pp.1~668 (2008), 민음사
- 정재서, "동아시아 여성의 기원", pp.267~ (2009), 이화여대출판부
- 達西烏拉彎․畢馬, "臺灣布農族的生命祭儀", pp.1~188 (1998), 臺原出版社
- 達西烏拉彎․畢馬, "泰雅族神話與傳說", pp.1~492 (2002), 晨星出版
- 達西烏拉彎․畢馬, "邵族神話與傳說", pp.84~92 (2003), 晨星出版
- 徐萬邦, "中國少數民族文化通論", pp.187~ (1997), 中央民族大學
- 蘇雪林, "屈賦論叢", pp.429~430 (1980), 國立編譯館
- 王孝廉, "神話與小說", pp.132~ (1986), 時報文化社
- 李福淸, "神話與鬼話", pp.1~405 (2001), 社會科學文獻出版社
- 李亦園, "師徒·神話及其他", pp.122~124 (1983), 正中書局
- 林道生, "原住民神話故事全集3", pp.1~172 (2002), 漢藝色硏
- 林道生, "原住民神話與文化賞析", pp.1~234 (2003), 漢藝色硏
- 林道生, "原住民神話故事全集4", pp.1~173 (2004), 漢藝色硏
- 林道生, "原住民神話故事全集5", pp.1~175 (2004), 漢藝色硏
- 潛明玆, "中國神話學", pp.1~488 (1994), 寧夏人民出版社
- 潛明玆, "中國古代神話與傳說", pp.1~211 (1996), 商務印書館
- 陳建憲, "神祇與英雄", pp.106~ (1995), 新華書店
- 陳炳良, "神話·禮儀·文學", pp.44~49 (1985), 聯經
- "中國各民族宗敎與神話大詞典", pp.144~ (1993), 學苑出版社
