본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

일반내시경과 세경(細徑)내시경의 환자 만족도 비교 -가는 것이 좋은 것인가?

Conventional EGD versus Small-caliber EGD -The Thinner, the Better?-

양진모|정인식|한석원|최규용|장우임|이진선|정우철|김유정|이보인|이강문
대한소화기내시경학회 (The Korean Society Of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy)|2006.12|Clinical Endoscopy|제33권 제6호|pp. 333-338

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

주제분류내과학

초록

Abstract

Background/Aims: Small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (scEGD) was developed to facilitate unsedated EGD, and has many advantages over sedated EGD in terms of costs and complications. This study compared the feasibility and tolerance of scEGD with unsedated conventional EGD (cEGD), and examined the effect of the endoscopic diameter on the patients' tolerance. Methods: A total of 114 patients who were referred for a diagnostic EGD was randomly allocated to undergo either scEGD (GIF XP260, Olympus, diameter 6.5 mm; n=57) or cEGD (GIF XQ240, Olympus, diameter 9.0 mm; n=57). After EGD, the patients and endoscopists completed questionnaires on the level of discomfort, satisfaction and acceptance of the examination. Results: Patients in the scEGD group reported significantly less discomfort (choking, pain and nausea) and more overall satisfaction than those in the cEGD group. Patients in the scEGD group were more willing to choose the same procedure again if medically indicated. According to multivariate analysis, the ultrathin endoscopic diameter itself was positively associated with the increased patients' satisfaction (odds ratio 3.07, p=0.003). Conclusions: scEGD has comparable feasibility and accuracy but is more tolerable than cEGD. scEGD may have a role in clinical practice by minimizing the level of discomfort during unsedated EGD. (Korean J Gastrointest Endosc 2006;33:333 338)

참고문헌 (21)

  1. "Review article:premedication and intravenous sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy", 4, pp.103~122 (1990)
  2. "Cardiopulmonary risk of esophagogastroduodenoscopy.Role of endoscope diameter and systemic sedation", 88, pp.468~472 (1985)
  3. "Sedation for upper gastrointestinal endoscopy:results of a nationwide survey", 32, pp.12~15 (1991)
  4. "A double-blind randomized trial of low-dose versus high-dose topical anaesthesia in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy", 10, pp.975~979 (1996)
  5. "Effect of relaxation music on patient tolerance of gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures", 25, pp.343~345 (1997)
  6. "Presence of family member during upper endoscopy", 22, pp.272~274 (1996)
  7. "Effects of video information on precolonoscopy anxiety and knowledge", 354, pp.2032~2035 (1999)
  8. "Unsedated small- caliber Esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus conventional EGD", 117, pp.1301~1307 (1999)
  9. "Comparison of thin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy", 51, pp.625~629 (2002)
  10. "Unsedated ultrathin EGD is well accepted when compared with conventional sedated EGD", 125, pp.1606~1612 (2003)
  11. "A prospective controlled trial of an ultrathin versus a con-ventional endoscope in unsedated upper gastrointestinal endoscopy", 33, pp.311~316 (2001)
  12. "Usefulness of unsedated 6.5 mm endoscopy compared with sedated standard endoscopy", 29, pp.119~125 (2004)
  13. "Prospective evaluation of transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy", 49, pp.285~291 (1999)
  14. "A randomized trial of unsedated transnasal small-caliber esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) versus peroral small-caliber EGD versus conventional EGD", 35, pp.641~646 (2003)
  15. "Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy without sedation:a prospective study of 2000 examinations", 35, pp.79~81 (1989)
  16. "A prospective randomized comparison of unsedated ultrathin versus standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy in routine outpatient gastroenterology practice", 35, pp.647~651 (2003)
  17. "Patient tolerance and acceptance of unsedated ultrathin esophagoscopy", 55, pp.620~623 (2002)
  18. "A prospective, randomized controlled trial of sedation vs. no sedation in outpatient diagnostic upper gastrointestinal endoscopy", 30, pp.21~24 (1998)
  19. "Factors associated with tolerance to, and discomfort with, unsedated diagnostic gastroscopy", 36, pp.1352~1357 (2001)
  20. "Identification of factors that influence tolerance of upper gastrointestinal endoscopy", 11, pp.201~204 (1999)
  21. "Unsedated upper endoscopy in children", 55, pp.624~630 (2002)

관련 논문AI추천

극세경 경비 내시경검사의 유용성과 안전성의 전향적 연구권혁춘, 김진홍, 박병준, 신성재, 유병무, 이광재, 이기명, 정성현, 정재연, 정재학, 한종대, 황재철대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2008 · 제36권 제6호의식하 진정 내시경과 비교한 직경 6.5 mm 내시경의 유용성김나영, 김진욱, 남수연, 송인성, 이동호, 이창수, 정현채, 황진혁대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2004 · 제29권 제3호A Shortened Fasting Time for Semifluid Diet Prior to Esophagogastroduodenoscopy: Achievement of Patient Comfort, Endoscopic Visibility, and Safety박재용거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2023 · 제17권 제3호An Ultrathin Endoscope with a 2.4-mm Working Channel Shortens the Esophagogastroduodenoscopy Time by Shortening the Suction TimeAlan Kawarai Lefor, Hironori Yamamoto, Kenjiro Shinozaki, Satoshi Shinozaki, Yoshimasa Miura, Yuji Ino대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2015 · 제48권 제6호Does Single Balloon Enteroscopy Have Similar Efficacy and Endoscopic Performance Compared with Double Balloon Enteroscopy?장현주거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2017 · 제11권 제4호Endoscopist Specialty Is Associated with High-Quality Endoscopy in Korea김영호, 김현수, 문정섭, 이항락, 정일권, 조유경, 차재명, 한동수연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2012 · 제53권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (7건)

담즙 유출의 원인과 내시경 치료 효과장병익, 최선택, 은종렬, 김태년pp. 346-352진단 내시경 시 발생한 Boerhaave 증후군의 비수술 치료 1예한준열, 박수헌, 김재광, 최규용, 박용범, 하병화, 황은미, 오유경, 김진일, 성혜영, 정대영, 조세현pp. 353-356외성장 양상의 위편평세포암이정훈, 송인성, 고성준, 정현채, 김주성, 김상균, 김보현, 양기영, 김범석, 강해연pp. 357-360점막하종양의 양상을 보인 위선암 1예황은미, 정대영, 김진일, 김순섭, 김재광, 김명석, 한준열, 장은철, 박수헌, 최규용, 조세현pp. 368-371성인에서 우측 대장에 발생한 연소성 용종 2예정금모, 김지웅, 김양호, 이용웅, 주명진, 조진웅, 고은영, 박승민, 조용근pp. 372-376
원문 보기