본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Diagnostic Ability of Convex-Arrayed Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Major Vascular Invasion in Pancreatic Cancer

0

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background/Aims: This study aimed to examine the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for major vascularinvasion in pancreatic cancer and to evaluate the relationship between EUS findings and pathological distance. Methods: In total, 57 consecutive patients who underwent EUS for pancreatic cancer before surgery were retrospectively reviewed. EUSimage findings were divided into four types according to the relationship between the tumor and major vessel (types 1 and 2: invasion,types 3 and 4: non-invasion). We also compared the EUS findings and pathologically measured distances between the tumors andevaluated vessels. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS diagnosis for vascular invasion were 89%, 92%, and 91%, respectively, in theveins and 83%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, in the arteries. The pathologically evaluated distances of cases with type 2 EUS findings weresignificantly shorter than those of cases with type 3 EUS findings in both the major veins (median [interquartile range], 96 [0–742] µmvs. 2,833 [1,076–5,694] µm, p=0.012) and arteries (623 [0–854] µm vs. 3,097 [1,396–6,000] µm, p=0.0061). All cases with a distance of≥1,000 µm between the tumors and main vessels were correctly diagnosed. Conclusions: Tumors at a distance ≥1,000 µm from the main vessels were correctly diagnosed by EUS.

Abstract

Background/Aims: This study aimed to examine the diagnostic ability of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) for major vascularinvasion in pancreatic cancer and to evaluate the relationship between EUS findings and pathological distance. Methods: In total, 57 consecutive patients who underwent EUS for pancreatic cancer before surgery were retrospectively reviewed. EUSimage findings were divided into four types according to the relationship between the tumor and major vessel (types 1 and 2: invasion,types 3 and 4: non-invasion). We also compared the EUS findings and pathologically measured distances between the tumors andevaluated vessels. Results: The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS diagnosis for vascular invasion were 89%, 92%, and 91%, respectively, in theveins and 83%, 94%, and 93%, respectively, in the arteries. The pathologically evaluated distances of cases with type 2 EUS findings weresignificantly shorter than those of cases with type 3 EUS findings in both the major veins (median [interquartile range], 96 [0–742] µmvs. 2,833 [1,076–5,694] µm, p=0.012) and arteries (623 [0–854] µm vs. 3,097 [1,396–6,000] µm, p=0.0061). All cases with a distance of≥1,000 µm between the tumors and main vessels were correctly diagnosed. Conclusions: Tumors at a distance ≥1,000 µm from the main vessels were correctly diagnosed by EUS.

참고문헌 (28)

  1. Pancreatric Section, British Society of Gastroenterology, "Guidelines for the management of patients with pancreatic cancer periampullary and ampullary carcinomas", Gut, 54(Suppl 5), pp.v1~v16 (2005)
  2. Warshaw AL, "Pancreatic carcinoma", N Engl J Med, 326, pp.455~465 (1992)
  3. Jemal A, "Cancer statistics, 2010", CA Cancer J Clin, 60, pp.277~300 (2010)
  4. Wagner M, "Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma", Br J Surg, 91, pp.586~594 (2004)
  5. Ahmad NA, "Endosonography is superior to angiography in the preoperative assessment of vascular involvement among patients with pancreatic carcinoma", J Clin Gastroenterol, 32, pp.54~58 (2001)
  6. DeWitt J, "Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer", Ann Intern Med, 141, pp.753~763 (2004)
  7. Arslan A, "Pancreatic carcinoma : MR, MR angiography and dynamic helical CT in the evaluation of vascular invasion", Eur J Radiol, 38, pp.151~159 (2001)
  8. DiMagno EP, "AGA technical review on the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. American Gastroenterological Association", Gastroenterology, 117, pp.1464~1484 (1999)
  9. Rösch T, "The endosonographic staging of pancreatic carcinoma", Dtsch Med Wochenschr, 117, pp.563~569 (1992)
  10. Megibow AJ, "Pancreatic adenocarcinoma : CT versus MR imaging in the evaluation of resectability--report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group", Radiology, 195, pp.327~332 (1995)
  11. Saftoiu A, "Role of endoscopic ultrasound in the diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer", J Clin Ultrasound, 37, pp.1~17 (2009)
  12. Michl P, "Evidence-based diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer", Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol, 20, pp.227~251 (2006)
  13. Dewitt J, "Comparison of endoscopic ultrasound and computed tomography for the preoperative evaluation of pancreatic cancer : a systematic review", Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 4, pp.717~725 (2006)
  14. Nawaz H, "Performance characteristics of endoscopic ultrasound in the staging of pancreatic cancer : a meta-analysis", JOP, 14, pp.484~497 (2013)
  15. Yang R, "Diagnostic accuracy of EUS and CT of vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer : a systematic review", J Cancer Res Clin Oncol, 140, pp.2077~2086 (2014)
  16. Puli SR, "Diagnostic accuracy of EUS for vascular invasion in pancreatic and periampullary cancers : a meta-analysis and systematic review", Gastrointest Endosc, 65, pp.788~797 (2007)
  17. Japan Pancreas Society, "Classification of pancreatic carcinoma" (2017), Kanehara & Co., Ltd.
  18. Nakata B, "Prognostic predictive value of endoscopic ultrasound findings for invasive ductal carcinomas of pancreatic head", Pancreas, 30, pp.200~205 (2005)
  19. Yeo CJ, "Pancreaticoduodenectomy for cancer of the head of the pancreas. 201 patients", Ann Surg, 221, pp.721~731 (1995)
  20. Tylén U, "Resectability and prognosis of carcinoma of the pancreas evaluated by angiography", Scand J Gastroenterol, 8, pp.691~697 (1973)
  21. Geer RJ, "Prognostic indicators for survival after resection of pancreatic adenocarcinoma", Am J Surg, 165, pp.68~72 (1993)
  22. Cameron JL, "Factors influencing survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for pancreatic cancer", Am J Surg, 161, pp.120~124 (1991)
  23. Launois B, "Total pancreatectomy for ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas with special reference to resection of the portal vein and multicentric cancer", World J Surg, 17, pp.122~126 (1993)
  24. "ACR manual on contrast media version 10.3" (2017)[URL]
  25. Buchs NC, "Vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer : imaging modalities, preoperative diagnosis and surgical management", World J Gastroenterol, 16, pp.818~831 (2010)
  26. Buchs NC, "Vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer : evaluation of endoscopic ultrasonography, computed tomography, ultrasonography, and angiography", Swiss Med Wkly, 137, pp.286~291 (2007)
  27. Zhang Y, "Preoperative vascular evaluation with computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for pancreatic cancer : a meta-analysis", Pancreatology, 12, pp.227~233 (2012)
  28. Li JH, "Endoscopic ultrasonography for tumor node staging and vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer : a meta-analysis", Dig Surg, 31, pp.297~305 (2014)

관련 논문AI추천

Clinical Role of Contrast-Enhanced Harmonic Endoscopic Ultrasound in Differentiating Solid Lesions of the Pancreas: A Single-Center Experience in Korea심찬섭, 이태윤, 천영국거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2013 · 제7권 제5호Endoscopic Ultrasonography for Vascular Invasion in Pancreatic CancerSeong-Hun Kim대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2019 · 제52권 제5호Prognosis and Clinical Characteristics of Patients with Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma Diagnosed by Endoscopic Ultrasonography but Indeterminate on Computed Tomography김성훈, 서동완, 송태준, 이상협, 전훈재, Cho Chang Min, Choi Jun-Ho, Cho Jae Hee, Kim Gwang Ha, Kim Tae Hyeon, Ko Sung Woo, Lee Dong Wook, Lee Tae Hoon, Yoon Jai Hoon, Yoon Seung Bae거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2022 · 제16권 제3호Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation for preoperative diagnosis of resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a prospective studyChika Kusano, Hiroshi Imaizumi, Junro Ishizaki, Kai Adachi, Kosuke Okuwaki, Masafumi Watanabe, Masayoshi Tadehara, Mitsuhiro Kida, Rikiya Hasegawa, Takaaki Matsumoto, Takahiro Kurosu, Taro Hanaoka, Tomohisa Iwai대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2024 · 제57권 제6호Current Status of Endoscopic Ultrasound Techniques for Pancreatic NeoplsmsHirofumi Kogure, Kazuhiko Koike, Naminatsu Takahara, Suguru Mizuno, Yousuke Nakai대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2019 · 제52권 제6호Endoscopic Ultrasound Can Differentiate High-Grade Pancreatic Intraepithelial Neoplasia, Small Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma, and Benign StenosisAkiyama Hidetoshi, Amano Yuji, Bhatia Vikram, Minami Ryuki, Mizukami Kazuhiro, Murakami Kazunari, Nakahodo Jun, Nishikiori Hidefumi, Sagami Ryota, Yamao Kenji, Yamao Kentaro거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2024 · 제18권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (21건)