본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Effectiveness of endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation for preoperative diagnosis of resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: a prospective study

1

조회

0

다운로드

0

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

Background/Aims: To validate endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) used in conjunction with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation (SOSE) as a preoperative diagnostic tool for resectable pancreatic cancer (R-PC) and borderline resectable PC (BR-PC). Methods: Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent EUS-TA for suspected R-PC or BR-PC were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity of EUS-TA together with SOSE based on the stereomicroscopically visible white core (SVWC) cutoff value. One or two sites were punctured by using a 22-gauge biopsy needle for EUS-TA, based on the SOSE findings. Results: We collected 99 specimens from 56 and 22 patients with R-PC and BR-PC, respectively. Based on the SOSE results, we performed 57 procedures with one puncture. The SVWC cutoff values were met in 73.7% and 73.1% of all specimens and in those obtained during the first puncture, respectively. The final diagnoses were malignant and benign tumors in 76 and two patients, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-TA for the 78 lesions were 90.8%, 100%, and 91.0%, respectively. The sensitivity for malignant diagnosis based on the SVWC cutoff value were 89.5% and 90.4% for the first puncture and all specimens, respectively. Conclusions: The sensitivity of EUS-TA in conjunction with SOSE for malignancy diagnosis in patients with suspected R-PC or BR-PC was 90.4%.

Abstract

Background/Aims: To validate endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition (EUS-TA) used in conjunction with stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation (SOSE) as a preoperative diagnostic tool for resectable pancreatic cancer (R-PC) and borderline resectable PC (BR-PC). Methods: Seventy-eight consecutive patients who underwent EUS-TA for suspected R-PC or BR-PC were enrolled. The primary endpoint was the sensitivity of EUS-TA together with SOSE based on the stereomicroscopically visible white core (SVWC) cutoff value. One or two sites were punctured by using a 22-gauge biopsy needle for EUS-TA, based on the SOSE findings. Results: We collected 99 specimens from 56 and 22 patients with R-PC and BR-PC, respectively. Based on the SOSE results, we performed 57 procedures with one puncture. The SVWC cutoff values were met in 73.7% and 73.1% of all specimens and in those obtained during the first puncture, respectively. The final diagnoses were malignant and benign tumors in 76 and two patients, respectively. The overall sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of EUS-TA for the 78 lesions were 90.8%, 100%, and 91.0%, respectively. The sensitivity for malignant diagnosis based on the SVWC cutoff value were 89.5% and 90.4% for the first puncture and all specimens, respectively. Conclusions: The sensitivity of EUS-TA in conjunction with SOSE for malignancy diagnosis in patients with suspected R-PC or BR-PC was 90.4%.

참고문헌 (29)

  1. Chen G, "Diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for pancreatic cancer : a meta-analysis", Pancreatology, 13, pp.298~304 (2013)
  2. Bhatia V, "Endoscopic ultrasonography-guided tissue acquisition : how to achieve excellence", Dig Endosc, 29, pp.417~430 (2017)
  3. Kanno A, "Adverse events of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for histologic diagnosis in Japanese tertiary centers : multicenter retrospective study", Dig Endosc, 33, pp.1146~1157 (2021)
  4. Wang KX, "Assessment of morbidity and mortality associated with EUS-guided FNA : a systematic review", Gastrointest Endosc, 73, pp.283~290 (2011)
  5. Kato H, "Clinical features and treatment outcome of borderline resectable pancreatic head", body cancer : a multi-institutional survey by the Japanese Society of Pancreatic Surgery, 2013, pp.20, 601~610
  6. Ielpo B, "A comparative study of neoadjuvant treatment with gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel versus surgery first for pancreatic adenocarcinoma", Surg Oncol, 26, pp.402~410 (2017)
  7. Fujii T, "Clinical benefits of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head : an observational study using inverse probability of treatment weighting", J Gastroenterol, 52, pp.81~93 (2017)
  8. Jang JY, "Oncological benefits of neoadjuvant chemoradiation with gemcitabine versus upfront surgery in patients with borderline resectable pancreatic cancer : a prospective, randomized, open-label, multicenter phase 2", 3 trial, 2018, pp.268, 215~222
  9. Motoi F, "A single-arm, phase II trial of neoad juvant gemcitabine and S1 in patients with resectable and borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma : PREP-01 study", J Gastroen terol, 54, pp.194~203 (2019)
  10. Takahashi K, "Diagnostic fine-needle bi opsy of small solid pancreatic lesions using a franseen needle during endoscopic ultrasound examination", Diagnostics(Basel), 11, pp.27~ (2020)
  11. Haba S, "Diagnostic ability and factors affect ing accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for pancreatic solid lesions : Japanese large single center experience", J Gastroenterol, 48, pp.973~981 (2013)
  12. Crinò SF, "Diagnostic yield of EUS-FNA of small(≤15 mm)solid pancreatic lesions using a 25-gauge needle", Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int, 17, pp.70~74 (2018)
  13. Li HZ, "Factors affecting the accuracy of en doscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration for the diagnosis of small(≤20 mm)pancreatic lesions", J Dig Dis, 21, pp.416~421 (2020)
  14. Park JS, "The impact of preoperative EUS-FNA for distal resectable pancreatic cancer : is it really effective enough to take risks?", Surg Endosc, 36, pp.3192~3199 (2022)
  15. Nakai Y, "Endoscopic ultrasonogra phy-guided tissue acquisition for small solid pancreatic lesions : does the size matter?", DEN Open, 2, pp.e52~ (2021)
  16. Kitano M, "Needle tract seeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition of pancreatic tumors : a nation wide survey in Japan", Dig Endosc, 34, pp.1442~1455 (2022)
  17. Yane K, "Non-negligible rate of needle tract seeding after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspi ration for patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for pancreatic cancer", Dig Endosc, 32, pp.801~811 (2020)
  18. Nakatsubo R, "Histopathological evaluation of needle tract seeding caused by EUS-fine-needle biopsy based on resected specimens from patients with solid pancreatic masses : an analysis of 73 consecutive cases", Endosc Ultrasound, 10, pp.207213~ (2021)
  19. Klapman JB, "Clinical impact of on-site cytopathology interpretation on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration", Am J Gastroenterol, 98, pp.1289~1294 (2003)
  20. Iwashita T, "Macroscopic on-site quality evaluation of biopsy specimens to improve the diagnostic accuracy during EUS-guided FNA using a 19-gauge needle for solid lesions : a single-center prospective pilot study(MOSE study)", Gastrointest Endosc, 81, pp.177~185 (2015)
  21. Masutani H, "On-site stereomicroscope quality evaluations to estimate white core cutoff lengths using EUS FNA biopsy sampling with 22-gauge needles", Gastrointest Endosc, 90, pp.947~956 (2019)
  22. Watanabe M, "Multicenter prospective study of the efficacy of stereomicroscopic on-site evaluation in endo scopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition in patients with pancre atic cancer", Pancreatology, 22, pp.311~316 (2022)
  23. van Riet PA, "Mapping international prac tice patterns in EUS-guided tissue sampling : outcome of a global survey", Endosc Int Open, 4, pp.E360~E370 (2016)
  24. Shah JN, "Melanoma seeding of an EUS-guided fine needle track", Gastrointest Endosc, 59, pp.923~924 (2004)
  25. Paquin SC, "A first report of tumor seed ing because of EUS-guided FNA of a pancreatic adenocarcinoma", Gastrointest Endosc, 61, pp.610~611 (2005)
  26. Levy MJ, "Prospective cytological assessment of gastrointestinal luminal fluid acquired during EUS : a potential source of false-positive FNA and needle tract seeding", Am J Gastroenterol, 105, pp.1311~1318 (2010)
  27. Levy MJ, "Analysis of cell-free DNA to as sess risk of tumoremia following endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic adenocarcinomas", Clin Gastroenterol Hepa tol, 16, pp.1632~1640 (2018)
  28. Doi S, "Needle tract implantation on the esophageal wall after EUS-guided FNA of metastatic mediastinal lymphadenopathy", Gastrointest Endosc, 67, pp.988~990 (2008)
  29. Kurosu T, "Pancreatic cancer cells may adhere to the external surface of the puncture needle after endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration", Pancreas, 52, pp.e298~e304 (2023)

관련 논문AI추천

Present and Future of Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition in Solid Pancreatic TumorsJae Keun Park, Kwang Hyuck Lee대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2019 · 제52권 제6호Technical Advances in Endoscopic Ultrasound(EUS)-Guided Tissue Acquisition for Pancreatic Cancers: How Can We Get the Best Results with EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration?Michel Kahaleh, Monica Gaidhane, Prashant Kedia대한소화기내시경학회 · Clinical Endoscopy2013 · 제46권 제5호Endoscopic ultrasound-guided tissue acquisition: Needle types, technical issues, and sample handlingWoo Hyun Paik소화기인터벤션의학회 · International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention2022 · 제11권 제3호Histology Combined with Cytology by Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration for the Diagnosis of Solid Pancreatic Mass and Intra- Abdominal Lymphadenopathy김지원, 김태현, 송호숙, 전병준, 최금하거트앤리버 소화기연관학회협의회 · Gut and Liver2013 · 제7권 제5호Scope position is a determining factor for diagnostic performance of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration for mass lesions in the pancreatic headHong Joo Kim, Nam Hee Kim소화기인터벤션의학회 · International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention2023 · 제12권 제4호How to optimize the diagnostic yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle sampling in solid pancreatic lesions from a technical perspective김홍주, Kim Nam Hee소화기인터벤션의학회 · International Journal of Gastrointestinal Intervention2023 · 제12권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (20건)