보조공학기기 선호도 검사 개발 및 타당성 검증
The Development and Validation of Assistive Technology Predisposition Assessment
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
본 연구의 목적은 보조공학기기를 지원하기 위한 상담과정에 활용할 수 있는 평가도구를 개발하는 데 있다. 평가지의 검사 문항은 문헌검토를 통해 도출하고, 이를 전문가 의견 수렴과 파일럿 테스트를 바탕으로 평가지를 최종 완성하였다. 개발된 평가지에 대한 타당성을 평가하기 위해 한국장애인고용공단에 보조공학기기를 신청한 장애인 165명에 대하여 실제 평가를 시행하였다. 평가 결과, Cronbach ɑ 값은 0.948로 신뢰도 수준은 매우 양호하였다. 구성개념에 대한 타당도 평가는 탐색적 요인분석과 확인적 요인분석을 실시했는데 단일 차원 개념을 잘 나타내고 있었다. 상관관계 분석과 판별분석을 통해 예측타당도를 확인한 결과, 예측타당도는 양호한 것으로 나타났다. 이상의 결과에서 본 연구에서 개발한 보조공학기기 선호도 검사의 신뢰도와 타당성은 유효한 것으로 평가된다. 본 평가도구는 작업용 보조공학기기의 상담평가 업무 지원을 위해 개발되었다. 그렇지만 선호도 문항의 주요 키워드를 일부 조정한다면 고용뿐만 아니라 모든 분야의 장애인을 대상으로 그 적용 범위를 확대할 수 있을 것으로 기대된다.
Abstract
The purpose of this research is to develop assessment tool which can be used in consulting process for support of assistive technology device. Assessment element is deduced through literature review and it was developed based on opinions of experts and pilot test result. The preliminary assessment to test validation and reliability of the developed tool, was conducted targeting 165 persons who use assistive technology devices provided by KEAD. The analysis result of reliability and validity of the developed assessment tool shows that the reliability level(Cronbach’s 0.948) is satisfactory. Regarding the validity test, construct validity and predictive validity turned out to be valid. This assessment tool was developed to support the task of consulting assessment of assistive technology device. However, it is expected that if some parts in main key words of predisposition test questions are adjusted, the application range can be expanded from the working disabled to all the disabled people.
참고문헌 (34)
- 김계수, "구조방정식 모형분석" (2007), 한나래출판사
- 세계보건기구, "국제기능·장애·건강분류" (2004), ICF한국번역출판위원회
- 안나연, "Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with assistive Technology(QUEST 2.0)의 한국어 번역 및 검증연구", 석사, 재활공학, pp.2009
- 이근민, "장애인 고용에서의 보조공학 효과분석", 재활복지, 11(3), pp.27~55 (2007), 한국장애인재활협회
- 이혜경, "한국어판 보조공학기기 사용 적합성 평가도구(Assistive Technology Device Predisposition Assessment: ATD PA) 개발", 박사, 재활공학, pp.2011
- 전영환, "보조공학기기의 장애인 고용증대 및 고용유지 효과", 재활복지공학회논문지, 6(2), pp.77~83 (2012), 한국재활복지공학회[DOI]
- 보조공학기기 지원사업 평가, "전영환", 한국장애인고용공단 고용개발원, ~ (2013)
- 채수영, "한국어판 Psychosocial lmpact of Assistive Devices Scale(PIADS) 번안 및 검증연구", 박사, 재활공학, pp.2008
- 공단 업무바인더, "한국장애인고용공단", 한국장애인고용공단, ~ (2014)
- Bailey, R. W., "Human Performance Engineering" (1989), Prentice-Hall
- Bain, B., "Survey report on the assessment of individuals with spinal cord injuries for assistive technology", Technology and Disability, pp.289~294 (1994)
- Cook, A. M., "Assistive technologies: Principles and practice" (2001), Mosby
- Day, H., "Piads: The Psychosocial Impact of Assistive Device Scale" (1996), Authors
- Demers, L., "Development of the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology(QUEST)", Assistive Technology, 8(1), pp.3~13 (1996)
- Enders, A., "Questionable devices : proceedings of the second annual meeting of the rehabilitation engineering society of north america" (1984), RESNA
- Fuhrer, M. J., "A framework for the conceptual modelling of assistive technology device outcomes", Disability & Rehabilitation, 25(22), pp.1243~1251 (2003)
- Hedberg, K. E., "Experiences among older persons using mobility devices", Disability and Rehabilitation: Assistive Technology, 2(1), pp.15~22 (2007)
- Hocking, C, "Function or Feelings: factors in abandonment of assistive devices", Technology and Disability, 11(1), pp.3~11 (1999)
- Hoelter, D. R., "The analysis of covariance structures: Goodness-of-fit indices, sociological", Methods and Research, 11, pp.325~344 (1983)
- Knops, L., "HEART-Line C, European Service Delivery Systems in Rehabilitation Technology" (1994), IRv
- LoPresti, E. F., "Assistive technology for cognitive rehabilitation: State of the art", Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 14, pp.5~39 (2004)
- Parette, H. P., "Effects of acculturation on assistive technology service delivery", Journal of Special Education Technology, 19(2), pp.31~41 (2004)
- Peltenburg, A., "Vergelijkend warenonderzoek van hulpmiddelen" (1991), SWOR
- Phillips, B., "Predictors of assistive technology abandonment", Assistive Technology, 5, pp.36~45 (1993)
- Rogers, J., "Assistive technology device use in patients with rheumatic disease: a literature review", The American Journal of Occupational therapy, 46(2), pp.120~127 (1992)
- Scherer, M. J, "Outcomes of assistive technology use on quality of life", Disability and Rehabilitation, 18(9), pp.439~448 (1996)
- Scherer, M. J., "Matching Person and Technology: a series of assessments for evaluating predispositions to and outcomes of technology we in rehabilitation, education, the workplace and other settings" (1998), The Institute for Matching Person & Technology
- Scherer, M. J., "Assessing the benefits of using assistive technologies and other supports for thinking, remembering and learning", Disability and Rehabilitation, 27(13), pp.731~739 (2005)
- Scherer, M. J., "Living in the state of stuck: How technology impacts the lives of people with disabilities" (2005), Brookline Books
- Scherer, M. J., "Assessing the benefits of assistive technology for activities and participation", Rehabilitation Psychology, 50, pp.132~141 (2005)
- Scherer, M. J., "But will the ATD be used?", Proceedings of the Resna 12th annual conference (1989)
- An investigative study on the impact of using assistive technology on the job, "Welch, M. M. C.", Center for Rehabilitation Technology Services. NIDRR, ~ (1997)
- Wielandt, T., "Compliance with prescribed adaptive equipment: a literature review", British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 63(2), pp.65~75 (2000)
- World Health Organization, "International classification of functioning, disability and health: ICF" (2001), WHO