본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Non-Calcified Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Ultrasound and Mammographic Findings Correlated with Histological Findings

2

조회

0

다운로드

3

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: To evaluate radiological findings of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to correlate those with histological features. Materials and Methods: From July 2002 to March 2006, 22 patients with histologically-proven non- calcified DCIS were included. Mammography was obtained in 19 patients, ultrasound in 18 patients, and both examinations in 15 patients. Radiological findings were evaluated according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System by American College of Radiology. Histological tumor subtype and Van Nuys classification of DCIS were assessed. Results: Histological subtypes consisted of mixed type in 11 patients (50%), comedo in 4 (18%), cribriform in 4 (18%), papillary type in 2 (9%), and solid in one (5%). According to Van Nuys classification, group 3 DCIS was observed in 13 (59%) patients. In the 19 patients who underwent mammography, 13 patients presented with abnormal findings: focal asymmetry in 7 patients (37%), masses in 4 (21%), skin thickening in one (5%), and architectural distortion in one (5%). In the 18 patients who had received breast ultrasound, a mass was present in 15 (83%) patients and ductal changes in 3 patients (17%). Sixty percent of patients with masses on ultrasound had group 3 DCIS and 100% of patients with ductal change had group 1 DCIS (p=0.017). Conclusion: Diagnosis of non-calcified DCIS by mammography is not an easy task due to the lack of typical malignant calcifications or masses. High resolution ultrasound can be useful for detecting non-calcified DCIS, and ultrasound findings are correlated with histological features.

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate radiological findings of non-calcified ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and to correlate those with histological features. Materials and Methods: From July 2002 to March 2006, 22 patients with histologically-proven non- calcified DCIS were included. Mammography was obtained in 19 patients, ultrasound in 18 patients, and both examinations in 15 patients. Radiological findings were evaluated according to the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System by American College of Radiology. Histological tumor subtype and Van Nuys classification of DCIS were assessed. Results: Histological subtypes consisted of mixed type in 11 patients (50%), comedo in 4 (18%), cribriform in 4 (18%), papillary type in 2 (9%), and solid in one (5%). According to Van Nuys classification, group 3 DCIS was observed in 13 (59%) patients. In the 19 patients who underwent mammography, 13 patients presented with abnormal findings: focal asymmetry in 7 patients (37%), masses in 4 (21%), skin thickening in one (5%), and architectural distortion in one (5%). In the 18 patients who had received breast ultrasound, a mass was present in 15 (83%) patients and ductal changes in 3 patients (17%). Sixty percent of patients with masses on ultrasound had group 3 DCIS and 100% of patients with ductal change had group 1 DCIS (p=0.017). Conclusion: Diagnosis of non-calcified DCIS by mammography is not an easy task due to the lack of typical malignant calcifications or masses. High resolution ultrasound can be useful for detecting non-calcified DCIS, and ultrasound findings are correlated with histological features.

참고문헌 (21)

  1. Dershaw DD, "Ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic findings and clinical implications", Radiology, 170, pp.411~415 (1989)
  2. Holland R, "Schuurmans Stekhoven JH. Extent, distribution, and mammographic", histological correlations of breast ductal carcinoma in situ, 1990, pp.335, 519~522
  3. Schnitt SJ, "Ductal carcinoma in situ (intraductal carcinoma) of the breast", N Engl J Med, 318, pp.898~903 (1988)
  4. Stomper PC, "Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: correlation between mammographic calcification and tumor subtype", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 159, pp.483~485 (1992)
  5. Ernster VL, "Mortality among women with ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast in the population-based surveillance, epidemiology and end results program", Arch Intern Med, 160, pp.953~958 (2000)
  6. Ikeda DM, "Ductal carcinoma in situ: atypical mammographic appearances", Radiology, 172, pp.661~666 (1989)
  7. Stomper PC, "Clinically occult ductal carcinoma in situ detected with mammography: analysis of 100 cases with radiologic- pathologic correlation", Radiology, 172, pp.235~241 (1989)
  8. Holland R, "Ductal carcinoma in situ: a proposal for a new classification", Semin Diagn Pathol, 11, pp.167~180 (1994)
  9. Berg WA, "Multicentric and multifocal cancer: whole-breast US in preoperative evaluation", Radiology, 214, pp.59~66 (2000)
  10. Crystal P, "Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 181, pp.177~182 (2003)
  11. Kaplan SS, "Clinical utility of bilateral whole-breast US in the evaluation of women with dense breast tissue", Radiology, 221, pp.641~649 (2001)
  12. Leconte I, "Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 180, pp.1675~1679 (2003)
  13. Stavros AT, "Sisney GA. Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions", Radiology, 196, pp.123~134 (1995)
  14. DiPiro PJ, "Image-guided core breast biopsy of ductal carcinoma in situ presenting as a non-calcified abnormality", Eur J Radiol, 30, pp.231~236 (1999)
  15. Moon WK, "US of ductal carcinoma in situ", Radiographics, 22, pp.269~280 (2002)
  16. American College of Radiology, "BI-RADS Committee. ACR BI-RADSⓇ breast imaging and reporting data system: breast imaging atlas. Reston" (2003), American College of Radiology
  17. Consensus Conference Committee, "Consensus conference on the classification of ductal carcinoma in situ", Hum Pathol, 28, pp.1221~1225 (1997)
  18. Poller DN, "Ideas in pathology. Ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast: a proposal for a new simplified histological classification association between cellular proliferation and c-erbB-2 protein expression", Mod Pathol, 7, pp.257~262 (1994)
  19. Silverstein MJ, "Prognostic classification of breast ductal carcinoma-in-situ", Lancet, 345, pp.1154~1157 (1995)
  20. Holland R, "Microcalcifications associated with ductal carcinoma in situ: mammographic-pathologic correlation", Semin Diagn Pathol, 11, pp.181~192 (1994)
  21. Yang WT, "Sonographic, mammographic, and histopathologic correlation of symptomatic ductal carcinoma in situ", AJR Am J Roentgenol, 182, pp.101~110 (2004)

관련 논문AI추천

Preoperative Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Assessment of the Size of Ductal Carcinoma In Situ남석진, 박승민, 백현준, Bookyung Han, Ha Woo Yi, Jai Min Ryu, Jeong Eon Lee, Mansour Alramadhan, Musaed Rayzah한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2016 · 제4권 제2호Preoperative Prediction of Ductal Carcinoma in situ Underestimation of the Breast using Dynamic Contrast Enhanced and Diffusion-weighted Imaging김민정, 김은경, 문희정, 박미나대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2013 · 제17권 제2호The Roles of Modern Breast Imaging Techniques for Evaluation of Lobular Carcinoma In Situ of the BreastDong-Young Noh, Han-Byoel Lee, Hanjong Shin, Hyeong-Gon Moon, Wonshik Han한국유방암학회 · Journal of Breast Disease2015 · 제3권 제2호A Method to Quantify Breast MRI for Predicting Tumor Invasion in Patients with Preoperative Biopsy- Proven Ductal Carcinoma in Situ (DCIS)강봉주, 고명수, 김성헌, 김인성, 송병주, 차은숙, 최병길, Atilla Peter Kiraly대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2013 · 제17권 제2호Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast: Mammographic, Sonographic and MR Imaging Findings고은영, 신정희, 이선정, 한부경대한자기공명의과학회 · Investigative Magnetic Resonance Imaging2012 · 제16권 제3호An Updated Nomogram for Predicting Invasiveness in Preoperative Ductal Carcinoma In Situ of the Breast김상화, 김승일, 김지예, 김지홍, 김하얀, 박병우, 박형석, 이관범, 이지아, 이해민, 조영업연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2019 · 제60권 제11호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (12건)