The Clinical Usefulness of the SD Bioline Influenza Antigen Test^® for Detecting the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus
1
조회
0
다운로드
9
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Though the 2009 worldwide influenza A (H1N1) pandemic has been declared to have ended, the influenza virus is expected to continue to circulate from some years as a seasonal influenza. A rapid antigen test (RAT) can aid in rapid diagnosis and allow for early antiviral treatment. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of RAT using SD Bioline Influenza Antigen Test^® kit to detect the influenza virus, considering various factors. From August 1, 2009 to October 10, 2009, a total of 938 patients who visited the outpatient clinic at Korea University Guro Hospital with influenza-like illnesses were enrolled in the study. Throat or nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained from each of the patients. Using these specimens, we evaluated the influenza detection rate by rapid antigen test based on the real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) method. In comparison with rRT-PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the RAT were 44.0% and 99.9%, respectively. The cyclic threshold values of RAT negative specimens were higher than RAT positive specimens (30.1±3.1 vs. 28.3±3.9, p=0.031). The sensitivity of the RAT kit was higher in patients who visited clinics within two days of symptom onset (60.4% vs. 11.1%, p=0.026). The results of this study show that the RAT cannot be recommended for general use in all patients with influenza-like illness because of its low sensitivity. The RAT may be used, only in the settings with limited diagnostic resources, for patients who visit a clinic within two days of symptom onset.
Abstract
Though the 2009 worldwide influenza A (H1N1) pandemic has been declared to have ended, the influenza virus is expected to continue to circulate from some years as a seasonal influenza. A rapid antigen test (RAT) can aid in rapid diagnosis and allow for early antiviral treatment. We evaluated the clinical usefulness of RAT using SD Bioline Influenza Antigen Test^® kit to detect the influenza virus, considering various factors. From August 1, 2009 to October 10, 2009, a total of 938 patients who visited the outpatient clinic at Korea University Guro Hospital with influenza-like illnesses were enrolled in the study. Throat or nasopharyngeal swab specimens were obtained from each of the patients. Using these specimens, we evaluated the influenza detection rate by rapid antigen test based on the real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) method. In comparison with rRT-PCR, the sensitivity and specificity of the RAT were 44.0% and 99.9%, respectively. The cyclic threshold values of RAT negative specimens were higher than RAT positive specimens (30.1±3.1 vs. 28.3±3.9, p=0.031). The sensitivity of the RAT kit was higher in patients who visited clinics within two days of symptom onset (60.4% vs. 11.1%, p=0.026). The results of this study show that the RAT cannot be recommended for general use in all patients with influenza-like illness because of its low sensitivity. The RAT may be used, only in the settings with limited diagnostic resources, for patients who visit a clinic within two days of symptom onset.
참고문헌 (9)
- Biggs C, "Performance of influenza rapid antigen testing in influenza in emergency department patients", Emerg Med J, 27, pp.5~7 (2010)
- Choi YJ, "Evaluation of New Rapid Antigen Test for Detection of Pandemic Influenza A", H1N1 2009 Virus, 2010, pp.48(6), 2260~2262[DOI]
- Louie JK, "Rapid influenza antigen test for diagnosis of pandemic (H1N1) 2009", Emerg Infect Dis, 16, pp.824~826 (2010)
- Vasoo S, "Rapid antigen tests for diagnosis of pandemic (Swine) influenza A", H1N1, 2009, pp.49, 1090~1093
- Blyth CC, "Rapid-test sensitivity for novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans", N Engl J Med, 361, pp.2493~ (2009)
- "WHO information for laboratory diagnosis of pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus in humans-revised" (2009)[URL]
- 황유선, "Evaluation of the Efficacies of Rapid Antigen Test, Multiplex PCR, and Real-time PCR for the Detection of a Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 30(2), pp.142~152 (2010), 대한진단검사의학회
- Yoo Y, "Clinical evaluation of the SD bioline influenza virus antigen test for rapid detection of influenza viruses A and B in children and adults during the influenza season", CLINICAL AND VACCINE IMMUNOLOGY, 14, pp.1050~1052 (2007), AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
- de la Tabla VO, "Comparison of combined nose-throat swabs with nasopharyngeal aspirates for detection of pandemic influenza A", H1N1 2009 virus by real-time reverse transcriptase PCR, 2010, pp.48, 3492~3495
