본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

대유행 인플루엔자(H1N1 2009)에서 신속항원검사 양성률

Detection Rate of Rapid Antigen Test for Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1 2009)

1

조회

0

다운로드

5

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류내과학

초록

There are few datas on the diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for pandemic influenza A (H1N1). We evaluated the performance of rapid antigen test for the diagnosis of pandemic influenza A (H1N1). During the period from 21 August 2009to 20 September 2009, 451 patients with influenza-like symptom underwent the rapid antigen test (SD Influenza Antigen, Standard Diagnostics, Yongin, Korea) and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) at the same time. Rapid antigen test results were positive for 65 of 90 patients with the positive results for pandemic influenza A (H1N1) on rRT-PCR assay. The sensitivity of the rapid antigen test was 72.2% (95% CI, 61.8-81.1) and the specificity was 100%(95% CI, 99.0-100). The positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI, 94.5-100) and negative predictive value was 93.5% (95% CI, 90.6-95.8).

Abstract

There are few datas on the diagnostic accuracy of rapid antigen test for pandemic influenza A (H1N1). We evaluated the performance of rapid antigen test for the diagnosis of pandemic influenza A (H1N1). During the period from 21 August 2009to 20 September 2009, 451 patients with influenza-like symptom underwent the rapid antigen test (SD Influenza Antigen, Standard Diagnostics, Yongin, Korea) and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) at the same time. Rapid antigen test results were positive for 65 of 90 patients with the positive results for pandemic influenza A (H1N1) on rRT-PCR assay. The sensitivity of the rapid antigen test was 72.2% (95% CI, 61.8-81.1) and the specificity was 100%(95% CI, 99.0-100). The positive predictive value was 100% (95% CI, 94.5-100) and negative predictive value was 93.5% (95% CI, 90.6-95.8).

참고문헌 (12)

  1. "Pandemic (H1N1) 2009 - update 74"[URL]
  2. Harper SA, "Seasonal influenza in adults and children--diagnosis, treatment, chemoprophylaxis, and institutional outbreak management: clinical practice guidelines of the Infectious Diseases Society of America", Clin Infect Dis, 48, pp.1003~1032 (2009)
  3. Vasoo S, "Rapid antigen tests for diagnosis of pandemic (Swine) inf luenza A", H1N1, 2009, pp.49, 1090~1093
  4. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention(CDC), "Evaluation of rapid inf luenza diagnostic tests for detection of novel influenza A (H1N1) virus - United States, 2009", MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 58, pp.826~829 (2009)
  5. Drexler JF, "Poor clinical sensitivity of rapid antigen test for influenza A pandemic (H1N1) 2009 virus", Emerg Infect Dis, 15, pp.1662~1664 (2009)
  6. Faix DJ, "Rapid-test sensitivity for novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1) virus in humans", N Engl J Med, 361(7), pp.728~729 (2009)
  7. Lee WG, "Evaluation of a rapid antigen test for detection of influenza virus", Korean Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 7, pp.119~123 (2004)
  8. 김재선, "인플루엔자 진단을 위한 신속 항원검사의 유용성", Korean Journal of Pediatrics, 48(12), pp.1348~1353 (2005), 대한소아과학회
  9. Chan KH, "Analytical sensitivity of rapid influenza antigen detection tests for swine-origin influenza virus (H1N1)", Journal of Clinical Virology, 45, pp.205~207 (2009)
  10. Lee JY, "Comparison of rapid antigen test for diagnosis of pandemic influenza A (H1N1) 2009", Infect Chemother, 41(2), pp.S275~ (2009)
  11. Heo JY, "Clincal usefulness of a rapid antigen test for novel influenza A (H1N1) virus", Infect Chemother, 41(2), pp.S198~ (2009)
  12. Bonner AB, "Impact of the rapid diagnosis of influenza on physician decision-making and patient management in the pediatric emergency department: results of a randomized, prospective, controlled trial", Pediatrics, 112, pp.363~367 (2003)

관련 논문AI추천

The Clinical Usefulness of the SD Bioline Influenza Antigen Test^® for Detecting the 2009 Influenza A (H1N1) Virus기새윤, 김우주, 노지윤, 송준영, 이재갑, 정혜원, 정희진, 최원석, 허중연연세대학교의과대학 · Yonsei Medical Journal2011 · 제52권 제4호신종인플루엔자 검사에 사용되는 신속항원검사와 실시간 역전사 중합효소연쇄반응검사의 비교권애린, 김재석, 김한성, 박지영, 송원근, 이규만, 조현찬대한임상미생물학회 · Annals of Clinical Microbiology2010 · 제13권 제3호한국에서의 2009 신종 인플루엔자 A의 임상양상과 다양한 진단 방법들의 비교권민정, 김영기, 남명현, 노경호, 윤수영, 이갑노, 이창규, 임채승, 조윤정대한진단검사의학회 · Laboratory Medicine Online2011 · 제1권 제1호Evaluation of the Efficacies of Rapid Antigen Test, Multiplex PCR, and Real-time PCR for the Detection of a Novel Influenza A (H1N1) Virus김경희, 이미애, 황유선대한진단검사의학회 · Annals of Laboratory Medicine2010 · 제30권 제2호비인두 면봉 검체와 비인두 흡인 검체로 시행한 SD BIOLINE Influenza Antigen 키트의 비교 평가박노진, 방해인, 신유정, 신정원, 최태윤대한임상미생물학회 · Annals of Clinical Microbiology2010 · 제13권 제4호일개 거점병원에 방문한 신종인플루엔자 환자의 특성과 진단방법의 유용성김성은, 김준수, 김찬웅, 박용순, 이동훈, 이상진대한가정의학회 · Korean Journal of Family Medicine2010 · 제31권 제2호

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (15건)