Transmesocolic Approach for Left Side Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: Comparison with Laterocolic Approach in the Initial Learning Period
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of transmesocolic (TMC) laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with conventional laterocolic procedure for surgeons with limited experience. Materials and Methods: We started laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 2009. Since then, 21 patients of left side disease have undergone this surgery in our institution. To access the left ureteropelvic junction, we used the conventional laterocolic approach in 9 patients, while the transmesocolic approach was used in the remaining 12 patients, and perioperative results and follow-up data were then compared. Results: The mean operative time using the transmesocolic approach was significantly shorter than the conventional laterocolic approach (242 vs. 308 min, p=0.022). Furthermore, there was no complication or open conversion. Postoperative pain was significantly decreased in the TMC group (2.8 vs. 4.0 points, measured using the visual analogue scale on the first postoperative day, p=0.009). Postoperative complications were encountered in two patients. All patients were symptom-free after 1 year of follow-up, and radiologic success rates for each group were 92 and 89%, respectively. Conclusion: Direct exposure of the ureteropelvic junction via the mesocolon saves time during the colon mobilization procedure. The approach is safe and feasible even for surgeons with limited experience, and has success rates similar to those of the conventional laterocolic approach.
Abstract
Purpose: To evaluate the outcome of transmesocolic (TMC) laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared with conventional laterocolic procedure for surgeons with limited experience. Materials and Methods: We started laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in 2009. Since then, 21 patients of left side disease have undergone this surgery in our institution. To access the left ureteropelvic junction, we used the conventional laterocolic approach in 9 patients, while the transmesocolic approach was used in the remaining 12 patients, and perioperative results and follow-up data were then compared. Results: The mean operative time using the transmesocolic approach was significantly shorter than the conventional laterocolic approach (242 vs. 308 min, p=0.022). Furthermore, there was no complication or open conversion. Postoperative pain was significantly decreased in the TMC group (2.8 vs. 4.0 points, measured using the visual analogue scale on the first postoperative day, p=0.009). Postoperative complications were encountered in two patients. All patients were symptom-free after 1 year of follow-up, and radiologic success rates for each group were 92 and 89%, respectively. Conclusion: Direct exposure of the ureteropelvic junction via the mesocolon saves time during the colon mobilization procedure. The approach is safe and feasible even for surgeons with limited experience, and has success rates similar to those of the conventional laterocolic approach.
참고문헌 (28)
- Moon DA, "Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: evolution of a new gold standard", Urology, 67, pp.932~936 (2006)
- El-Shazly MA, "Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: status and review of literature", J Endourol, 21, pp.673~678 (2007)
- Mandhani A, "Safety profile and complications of transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty: a critical analysis", J Endourol, 19, pp.797~802 (2005)
- Sundaram CP, "Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction", J Urol, 169, pp.2037~2040 (2003)
- Rassweiler JJ, "Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty", J Urol, 177, pp.1000~1005 (2007)
- Shalhav AL, "Minimizing knot tying during reconstructive laparoscopic urology", Urology, 68, pp.508~513 (2006)
- Inagaki T, "Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: current status", BJU Int, 95(2), pp.102~105 (2005)
- Sorensen MD, "Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty", J Urol, 185(6), pp.2517~2522 (2011)
- Mandhani A, "Steps to reduce operative time in laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty for moderate to large renal pelvis", Urology, 66, pp.981~984 (2005)
- Singh O, "Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: an analysis of first 100 cases and important lessons learned", Int Urol Nephrol, 43, pp.85~90 (2011)
- Türk IA, "Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty--the method of choice in the presence of an enlarged renal pelvis and crossing vessels", Eur Urol, 42, pp.268~275 (2002)
- Kaouk JH, "Laparoscopic dismembered tubularized flap pyeloplasty: a novel technique", J Urol, 167, pp.229~231 (2002)
- Araki H, "Laparoscopic pyeloplasty using endoscopic GIA stapler for ureteropelvic junction obstruction", J Endourol, 19, pp.143~146 (2005)
- Romero FR, "Transmesenteric laparoscopic pyeloplasty", J Urol, 176(6), pp.2526~2529 (2006)
- Castillo OA, "Transmesocolic pyeloplasty: experience of a single center", J Endourol, 21, pp.415~418 (2007)
- Porpiglia F, "Transperitoneal left laparoscopic pyeloplasty with transmesocolic access to the pelvi-ureteric junction: technique description and results with a minimum follow-up of 1 year", BJU Int, 101, pp.1024~1028 (2008)
- Ramalingam M, "Transmesocolic approach to laparoscopic pyeloplasty: our 8-year experience", J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A, 18, pp.194~198 (2008)
- Eden CG, "Extraperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered fibrin-glued pyeloplasty: medium-term results", Br J Urol, 80, pp.382~389 (1997)
- Chiu AW, "Creation of ureteropelvic junction obstruction and its correction by chemical glue-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty", J Endourol, 17, pp.23~28 (2003)
- Wolf JS Jr, "Comparison of fibrin glue, laser weld, and mechanical suturing device for the laparoscopic closure of ureterotomy in a porcine model", J Urol, 157, pp.1487~1492 (1997)
- Ost MC, "Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction", Urology, 66(5), pp.47~51 (2005)
- Moore RG, "Laparoscopic pyeloplasty: experience with the initial 30 cases", J Urol, 157, pp.459~462 (1997)
- Gupta NP, "Transmesocolic robot-assisted pyeloplasty: single center experience", J Endourol, 23, pp.945~948 (2009)
- Sedláček J, "Transmesocolic laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: a standard approach for the left-side repair", J Pediatr Urol, 6, pp.171~177 (2010)
- Patel V, "Robotic-assisted laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty", Urology, 66, pp.45~49 (2005)
- Braga LH, "Pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty in a referral center: lessons learned", J Endourol, 21, pp.738~742 (2007)
- Wu Z, "Novel method for double-J stenting in retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty", Urology, 77, pp.354~356 (2011)
- Mandhani A, "Is antegrade stenting superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty?", J Urol, 171, pp.1440~1442 (2004)