Laparoscopy versus Open Nephroureterectomy in Prognostic Outcome of Patients with Advanced Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer: A Retrospective, Multicenter, Propensity-Score Matching Analysis
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes between open nephroureterectomy (ONU) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Materials and Methods The medical records of consecutive ONU and LNU cases from five tertiary institutions were retrospectively analyzed between 2000 and 2012. The propensity-score matching methodology was used to compare the two surgical approaches in terms of age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, grade, pathologic T and N categories, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, and follow-up duration. The Kaplan-Meier with log-rank tests and clustered Cox regression were used to compare the estimated rates of survival for each surgical approach and to investigate the effect of the surgical approach on each prognostic outcome. Results Six hundred thirty-eight propensity-score matching pairs (n=1,276) were compared; LNU was significantly better than ONU in all types of survival, including intravesical recurrencefree survival (IVRFS), disease-free survival, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.05). The 3-year OS and CSS rates were significantly higher with LNU than with ONU (p < 0.05). Compared with ONU, LNU had significantly better 3-year OS and CSS rates (82.9% and 86.2% vs. 78.3% and 81.8%); there were no differences at 5 years. In subgroup analysis of the early-staged group, advanced-stage group, lymph node–positive group, and lymph node–negative group, the two approaches did not significantly affect prognostic outcomes, except LNU improved the IVRFS in the lymph node–negative or no history of previous bladder cancer group. Conclusion LNU had a significantly better prognostic outcome than ONU after propensity-score matching.
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare oncologic outcomes between open nephroureterectomy (ONU) and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy (LNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Materials and Methods The medical records of consecutive ONU and LNU cases from five tertiary institutions were retrospectively analyzed between 2000 and 2012. The propensity-score matching methodology was used to compare the two surgical approaches in terms of age, body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, tumor location, grade, pathologic T and N categories, the presence of lymphovascular invasion, and follow-up duration. The Kaplan-Meier with log-rank tests and clustered Cox regression were used to compare the estimated rates of survival for each surgical approach and to investigate the effect of the surgical approach on each prognostic outcome. Results Six hundred thirty-eight propensity-score matching pairs (n=1,276) were compared; LNU was significantly better than ONU in all types of survival, including intravesical recurrencefree survival (IVRFS), disease-free survival, overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (p < 0.05). The 3-year OS and CSS rates were significantly higher with LNU than with ONU (p < 0.05). Compared with ONU, LNU had significantly better 3-year OS and CSS rates (82.9% and 86.2% vs. 78.3% and 81.8%); there were no differences at 5 years. In subgroup analysis of the early-staged group, advanced-stage group, lymph node–positive group, and lymph node–negative group, the two approaches did not significantly affect prognostic outcomes, except LNU improved the IVRFS in the lymph node–negative or no history of previous bladder cancer group. Conclusion LNU had a significantly better prognostic outcome than ONU after propensity-score matching.
참고문헌 (22)
- Liang C, "Upper tract urothelial carcinomas accompanied by previous or synchronous nonmuscle-invasive bladder cancer and preoperative hydronephrosis might have worse oncologic outcomes after radical nephroureterectomy", Clin Genitourin Cancer, 14, pp.e469~e477 (2016)
- Raman JD, "Management of patients with upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma", Nat Clin Pract Urol, 4, pp.432~443 (2007)
- Ariane MM, "Assessment of oncologic control obtained after open versus laparoscopic nephroureterectomy for upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas(UUT-UCs) : results from a large French multicenter collaborative study", Ann Surg Oncol, 19, pp.301~308 (2012)
- Peyronnet B, "Oncological outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open radical nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma : an European Association of Urology guidelines systematic review", Eur Urol Focus, 5, pp.205~223 (2019)
- Epstein JI, "The World Health Organization", International Society of Urological Pathology consensus classification of urothelial (transitional cell) neoplasms of the urinary bladder. Bladder Consensus Conference Committee, 1998, pp.22, 1435~1448
- Edge SB, "The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM", Ann Surg Oncol, 17, pp.1471~1474 (2010)
- Kim HS, "Laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy is associated with worse survival outcomes than open radical nephroureterectomy in patients with locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma", World J Urol, 34, pp.859~869 (2016)
- Kido K, "Oncologic outcomes for open and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma", Int J Clin Oncol, 23, pp.726~733 (2018)
- Liu JY, "Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy to treat localized and", or locally advanced upper tract urothelial carcinoma : oncological outcomes from a multicenter study, 2017, pp.17, 8~
- Sung HH, "Diagnostic ureterorenoscopy is associated with increased intravesical recurrence following radical nephroureterectomy in upper tract urothelial carcinoma", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0139976~ (2015)
- Klein JP, "Survival analysis: techniques for censored and truncated data" (2005), Springer Science &Business Media
- Hanna N, "Propensity-score-matched comparison of perioperative outcomes between open and laparoscopic nephroureterectomy : a national series", Eur Urol, 61, pp.715~721 (2012)
- Ni S, "Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy for the treatment of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma : a systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies", Eur Urol, 61, pp.1142~1153 (2012)
- Zhang S, "Long-term oncologic outcomes of laparoscopic nephroureterectomy versus open nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis", PeerJ, 4, pp.e2063~ (2016)
- Simone G, "Laparoscopic versus open nephroureterectomy : perioperative and oncologic outcomes from a randomised prospective study", Eur Urol, 56, pp.520~526 (2009)
- Kim HS, "Association between demographic factors and prognosis in urothelial carcinoma of the upper urinary tract : a systematic review and meta-analysis", Oncotarget, 8, pp.7464~7476 (2017)
- Verhoest G, "Predictive factors of recurrence and survival of upper tract urothelial carcinomas", World J Urol, 29, pp.495~501 (2011)
- Li CC, "Significant predictive factors for prognosis of primary upper urinary tract cancer after radical nephroureterectomy in Taiwanese patients", Eur Urol, 54, pp.1127~1134 (2008)
- Parsons JK, "Complications of abdominal urologic laparoscopy : longitudinal five-year analysis", Urology, 63, pp.27~32 (2004)
- Gum PA, "Aspirin use and all-cause mortality among patients being evaluated for known or suspected coronary artery disease : a propensity analysis", JAMA, 286, pp.1187~1194 (2001)
- Rai BP, "Surgical management for upper urinary tract transitional cell carcinoma", Cochrane Database Syst Rev, (4), pp.CD007349~ (2011)
- Jackson CL, "Urologic laparoscopy", Surg Oncol Clin N Am, 10, pp.571~578 (2001)