본문 바로가기
KERD
논문KCI 등재

Appropriate Antigen Concentrations and Timing of a Nasal Provocation Test

1

조회

0

다운로드

1

인용

0

참고문헌

키워드

주제분류의학일반

초록

Purpose: We aimed to determine appropriate antigen concentrations and the right time to evaluate intranasal changes when performinga nasal provocation test (NPT). Also, we sought to analyze the diagnostic usefulness of individual nasal symptom and peaknasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). Materials and Methods: We divided 46 patients into allergic rhinitis (AR) group (n=19) and a non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) group(n=27). We performed intranasal challenge with 100 AU/mL of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) and measured changes innasal symptoms [scored using the visual analogue scale (VAS)] and PNIF%. If the patient showed significant changes, VAS andPNIF were assessed again after another 15 minutes. In patients without significant changes, we administered 1000 AU/mL andmeasured changes in nasal symptoms and PNIF% after 15 and 30 minutes. Results: Fifteen minutes after the 100 AU/mL challenge, the AR group showed more significant VAS changes in all nasal symptoms,total nasal symptom score (TNSS), and PNIF% change than the NAR group. Among the AR group, patients who did not respondto 100 AU/mL exhibited less significant differences relative to the NAR group, even after 1000 AU/mL challenge. Receiveroperating characteristic curve analysis for VAS changes 15 minutes after 100 AU/mL challenge revealed that all nasal symptomshad area under the curve (AUC) values of ≥0.84 (p<0.001). TNSS change had an AUC value of 0.929 (p<0.001), while PNIF% changehad an AUC value of 0.834. Conclusion: We could determine the optimal concentration (100 AU/mL), timing (15 minutes after challenge), and parameters(changes in TNSS and PNIF%) when performing NPT.

Abstract

Purpose: We aimed to determine appropriate antigen concentrations and the right time to evaluate intranasal changes when performinga nasal provocation test (NPT). Also, we sought to analyze the diagnostic usefulness of individual nasal symptom and peaknasal inspiratory flow (PNIF). Materials and Methods: We divided 46 patients into allergic rhinitis (AR) group (n=19) and a non-allergic rhinitis (NAR) group(n=27). We performed intranasal challenge with 100 AU/mL of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) and measured changes innasal symptoms [scored using the visual analogue scale (VAS)] and PNIF%. If the patient showed significant changes, VAS andPNIF were assessed again after another 15 minutes. In patients without significant changes, we administered 1000 AU/mL andmeasured changes in nasal symptoms and PNIF% after 15 and 30 minutes. Results: Fifteen minutes after the 100 AU/mL challenge, the AR group showed more significant VAS changes in all nasal symptoms,total nasal symptom score (TNSS), and PNIF% change than the NAR group. Among the AR group, patients who did not respondto 100 AU/mL exhibited less significant differences relative to the NAR group, even after 1000 AU/mL challenge. Receiveroperating characteristic curve analysis for VAS changes 15 minutes after 100 AU/mL challenge revealed that all nasal symptomshad area under the curve (AUC) values of ≥0.84 (p<0.001). TNSS change had an AUC value of 0.929 (p<0.001), while PNIF% changehad an AUC value of 0.834. Conclusion: We could determine the optimal concentration (100 AU/mL), timing (15 minutes after challenge), and parameters(changes in TNSS and PNIF%) when performing NPT.

참고문헌 (19)

  1. 한두희, "Long-term Breastfeeding in the Prevention of Allergic Rhinitis: Allergic Rhinitis Cohort Study for Kids (ARCO-Kids Study)", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 12(3), pp.301~307 (2019), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  2. Tantilipikorn P, "Nasal provocation test:how to maximize its clinical use?", Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol, 28, pp.225~231 (2010)
  3. Jang TY, "Nasal provocation test is useful for discriminating allergic, nonallergic, and local allergic rhinitis", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 29, pp.e100~4 (2015)
  4. Rondón C, "Nasal allergen provocation test with multiple aeroallergens detects polysensitization in local allergic rhinitis", J Allergy Clin Immunol, 128, pp.1192~1197 (2011)
  5. Les´niak M, "Comparison of the basophil activation test versus the nasal provocation test in establishing eligibility for specific immunotherapy", Pol Arch Med Wewn, 126, pp.521~529 (2016)
  6. Airaksinen L, "Use of nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational rhinitis", Rhinology, 45, pp.40~46 (2007)
  7. Hytönen M, "Nasal provocation test in the diagnostics of occupational allergic rhinitis", Rhinology, 34, pp.86~90 (1996)
  8. Augé J, "EAACI position paper on the standardization of nasal allergen challenges", Allergy, 73, pp.1597~1608 (2018)
  9. Kim YH, "Immunologic properties and clinical features of local allergic rhinitis", J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 41, pp.51~57 (2012)
  10. Kim YH, "Clinical characteristics and therapeutic outcomes of patients with localized mucosal allergy", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 24, pp.e89~92 (2010)
  11. Vardouniotis A, "Local allergic rhinitis revisited", Curr Allergy Asthma Rep, 20, pp.22~ (2020)
  12. Schiavi L, "Nasal reactivity evaluation in children with allergic rhinitis receiving grass pollen sublingual immunotherapy", Allergy Asthma Proc, 41, pp.357~362 (2020)
  13. Ramírez-Jiménez F, "Effect of LTRA in L-ASA challenge for aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease diagnosis", J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract, 9, pp.1554~1561 (2021)
  14. 주수현, "Korean Modification of the Nasal Provocation Test With House Dust Mite Antigen Following the EAACI Guidelines", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 14(4), pp.382~389 (2021), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  15. Park KI, "Correlation of nasal eosinophilia and response after nasal provocation test in patients with nonallergic rhinitis", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 159, pp.231~237 (2018)
  16. 김규성, "Usefulness of Allerkin House Dust Mite Extract for Nasal Provocation Testing", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 10(3), pp.254~258 (2017), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
  17. Chang GU, "Nonspecific hyperreactivity and localized allergy : cause of discrepancy between skin prick and nasal provocation test", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 150, pp.194~200 (2014)
  18. Kim YH, "Proposed diagnostic standard using visual analogue scale and acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation test in allergic patients", Auris Nasus Larynx, 38, pp.340~346 (2011)
  19. Kim YH, "Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergic rhinitis", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 139, pp.120~123 (2008)

관련 논문AI추천

이 간행물의 다른 논문 (9건)