Korean Modification of the Nasal Provocation Test With House Dust Mite Antigen Following the EAACI Guidelines
1
조회
0
다운로드
2
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Objectives. We evaluated the usefulness of the standardized nasal provocation test (NPT) protocol recently published by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and compared the utility of several parameters for diagnosing allergic rhinitis (AR) caused by house dust mites (HDM). Subjective parameters were nasal and ocular symptoms measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), and objective parameters were peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), minimal cross-sectional area (MCA), and total nasal volume (TNV). Methods. Before and after spraying Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) allergen (1,000 AU/mL, 100 μL) into both nostrils of 13 patients with AR (AR group) and 22 patients with non-AR (NAR group), we used VAS scores to measure nasal symptoms (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching) and ocular symptoms and assessed PNIF, MCA, and TNV. Results. The AR group had significantly worse symptoms than the NAR group 15 minutes after DP challenge (P<0.001). After 30 minutes, nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea remained worse in the AR group (P<0.001); a similar but less marked difference was seen for sneezing (P=0.012) and itching (P=0.039). Ocular symptoms, PNIF, MCA, and TNV differed between groups after both 15 and 30 minutes (P<0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was higher for nasal obstruction (0.977), rhinorrhea (0.906), and TNV (0.979) than for sneezing (0.755), itching (0.673), and MCA (0.836). Conclusion. NPT performed according to the EAACI guidelines could help diagnose AR caused by HDM. TNV and VAS changes in nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea had higher diagnostic accuracy than other parameters.
Abstract
Objectives. We evaluated the usefulness of the standardized nasal provocation test (NPT) protocol recently published by the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) and compared the utility of several parameters for diagnosing allergic rhinitis (AR) caused by house dust mites (HDM). Subjective parameters were nasal and ocular symptoms measured using a visual analog scale (VAS), and objective parameters were peak nasal inspiratory flow (PNIF), minimal cross-sectional area (MCA), and total nasal volume (TNV). Methods. Before and after spraying Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) allergen (1,000 AU/mL, 100 μL) into both nostrils of 13 patients with AR (AR group) and 22 patients with non-AR (NAR group), we used VAS scores to measure nasal symptoms (nasal obstruction, rhinorrhea, sneezing, and itching) and ocular symptoms and assessed PNIF, MCA, and TNV. Results. The AR group had significantly worse symptoms than the NAR group 15 minutes after DP challenge (P<0.001). After 30 minutes, nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea remained worse in the AR group (P<0.001); a similar but less marked difference was seen for sneezing (P=0.012) and itching (P=0.039). Ocular symptoms, PNIF, MCA, and TNV differed between groups after both 15 and 30 minutes (P<0.05). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was higher for nasal obstruction (0.977), rhinorrhea (0.906), and TNV (0.979) than for sneezing (0.755), itching (0.673), and MCA (0.836). Conclusion. NPT performed according to the EAACI guidelines could help diagnose AR caused by HDM. TNV and VAS changes in nasal obstruction and rhinorrhea had higher diagnostic accuracy than other parameters.
참고문헌 (13)
- Agache I, "In vivo diagnosis of allergic diseases--allergen provocation tests", Allergy, 70(4), pp.355~365 (2015)
- Jang TY, "Nasal provocation test is useful for discriminating allergic, nonallergic, and local allergic rhinitis", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 29(4), pp.e100~e104 (2015)
- Rondon C, "Nasal allergen provocation test with multiple aeroallergens detects polysensitization in local allergic rhinitis", J Allergy Clin Immunol, 128(6), pp.1192~1197 (2011)
- Auge J, "EAACI Position paper on the standardization of nasal allergen challenges", Allergy, 73(8), pp.1597~1608 (2018)
- 김규성, "Usefulness of Allerkin House Dust Mite Extract for Nasal Provocation Testing", Clinical and Experimental Otorhinolaryngology, 10(3), pp.254~258 (2017), 대한이비인후과학회[DOI]
- Kim YH, "Proposed diagnostic standard using visual analogue scale and acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation test in allergic patients", Auris Nasus Larynx, 38(3), pp.340~346 (2011)
- Tomljenovic D, "Nasal and ocular responses after specific and nonspecific nasal challenges in seasonal allergic rhinitis", Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 116(3), pp.199~205 (2016)
- Park KI, "Correlation of nasal eosinophilia and response after nasal provocation test in patients with nonallergic rhinitis", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 159(2), pp.231~237 (2018)
- Chang GU, "Nonspecific hyper-reactivity and localized allergy: cause of discrepancy between skin prick and nasal provocation test", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 150(2), pp.194~200 (2014)
- Kim YH, "Nasal provocation test using allergen extract versus cold dry air provocation test: which and when?", Am J Rhinol Allergy, 27(2), pp.113~117 (2013)
- Kim YH, "Evaluation of acoustic rhinometry in a nasal provocation test with allergic rhinitis", Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 139(1), pp.120~123 (2008)
- Wandalsen GF, "Acoustic rhinometry in nasal provocation tests in children and adolescents", J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 26(3), pp.156~160 (2016)
- Boelke G, "Peak nasal inspiratory flow as outcome for provocation studies in allergen exposure chambers: a GA2 LEN study", Clin Transl Allergy, 7, pp.33~ (2017)