Meta-Analysis of the Diagnostic Efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel FAST v2 Assay for Respiratory Viral Infections
2
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: Acute respiratory viral infections pose significant morbidity and mortality, making it essential to diagnose respiratory viral infections rapidly. In this study, the diagnostic efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) FAST v2 test was evaluated on respiratory viral infections. Materials and Methods: Information was retrieved from electronic databases, including Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, for systematic review. Studies that fulfilled predefined inclusion criteria were included. After the extraction of information, statistical software was utilized for quality evaluation, data analysis, and assessment of publication bias. Results: Eighty groups in fourfold tables from nine articles were included to perform statistical analyses. Therein, the mean specificity and mean sensitivity of Luminex xTAG RVP FAST v2 test for the detection of respiratory viral infections were 0.99 (0.98–0.99) and 0.88 (0.87–0.90), respectively. Additionally, the negative and positive likelihood ratios were 0.14 (0.11–0.19) and 87.42 (61.88–123.50), respectively. Moreover, the diagnostic odds ratio and area under the curve of summary receiver operating characteristic were 714.80 and 0.9886, respectively. Conclusion: The Luminex xTAG RVP FAST v2 test could be a reliable and rapid diagnostic method for multiple respiratory viral infections.
Abstract
Purpose: Acute respiratory viral infections pose significant morbidity and mortality, making it essential to diagnose respiratory viral infections rapidly. In this study, the diagnostic efficacy of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Virus Panel (RVP) FAST v2 test was evaluated on respiratory viral infections. Materials and Methods: Information was retrieved from electronic databases, including Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, and Cochrane Library, for systematic review. Studies that fulfilled predefined inclusion criteria were included. After the extraction of information, statistical software was utilized for quality evaluation, data analysis, and assessment of publication bias. Results: Eighty groups in fourfold tables from nine articles were included to perform statistical analyses. Therein, the mean specificity and mean sensitivity of Luminex xTAG RVP FAST v2 test for the detection of respiratory viral infections were 0.99 (0.98–0.99) and 0.88 (0.87–0.90), respectively. Additionally, the negative and positive likelihood ratios were 0.14 (0.11–0.19) and 87.42 (61.88–123.50), respectively. Moreover, the diagnostic odds ratio and area under the curve of summary receiver operating characteristic were 714.80 and 0.9886, respectively. Conclusion: The Luminex xTAG RVP FAST v2 test could be a reliable and rapid diagnostic method for multiple respiratory viral infections.
참고문헌 (38)
- Birger R, "Asymptomatic shedding of respiratory virus among an ambulatory population across seasons", mSphere, 3, pp.e00249-18~ (2018)
- Nascimento-Carvalho CM, "Clinical significance of multiple respiratory virus detection", Pediatr Infect Dis J, 35, pp.338~339 (2016)
- Bakaletz LO, "Viral-bacterial co-infections in the respiratory tract", Curr Opin Microbiol, 35, pp.30~35 (2017)
- Tang JW, "Emerging, novel, and known influenza virus infections in humans", Infect Dis Clin North Am, 24, pp.603~617 (2010)
- Ginocchio CC, "Evaluation of multiple test methods for the detection of the novel 2009 influenza A(H1N1)during the New York City outbreak", J Clin Virol, 45, pp.191~195 (2009)
- Pabbaraju K, "Comparison of a singleplex real-time RT-PCR assay and multiplex respiratory viral panel assay for detection of influenza"A"in respiratory specimens", Influenza Other Respir Viruses, 5, pp.99~103 (2011)
- Munro SB, "Comparison of a multiplex realtime PCR assay with a multiplex Luminex assay for influenza virus detection", J Clin Microbiol, 51, pp.1124~1129 (2013)
- Chandrasekaran A, "Broad reactivity of the Luminex xTAG respiratory virus panel(RVP)assay for the detection of human rhinoviruses", J Clin Virol, 53, pp.272~273 (2012)
- Krunic N, "xTAG RVP assay : analytical and clinical performance", J Clin Virol (2007)
- Ginocchio CC, "Strengths and weaknesses of FDA-approved", cleared diagnostic devices for the molecular detection of respiratory pathogens, 2011, ~
- Nascimento-Carvalho AC, "Respiratory viruses among children with non-severe communityacquired pneumonia : a prospective cohort study", J Clin Virol, 105, pp.77~83 (2018)
- Al-Tawfiq JA, "Surveillance for emerging respiratory viruses", Lancet Infect Dis, 14, pp.992~1000 (2014)
- Goka EA, "Single and multiple respiratory virus infections and severity of respiratory disease : a systematic review", Paediatr Respir Rev, 15, pp.363~370 (2014)
- Matthay MA, "Acute respiratory distress syndrome after surgery : can the risk be decreased?", Anesth Analg, 111, pp.268~269 (2010)
- Mahony J, "Development of a respiratory virus panel test for detection of twenty human respiratory viruses by use of multiplex PCR and a fluid microbead-based assay", J Clin Microbiol, 45, pp.2965~2970 (2007)
- Bryce L, "A large-scale study of respiratory virus infection over 2 years using the Luminex xTAGRVP assay", Mil Med, 177, pp.1533~1538 (2012)
- 고대현, "Comparison of the Luminex xTAG Respiratory Viral Panel Fast v2 Assay With Anyplex II RV16 Detection Kit and AdvanSure RV Real-Time RT-PCR Assay for the Detection of Respiratory Viruses", Annals of Laboratory Medicine, 37(5), pp.408~414 (2017), 대한진단검사의학회
- Fox JD, "Nucleic acid amplification tests for detection of respiratory viruses", J Clin Virol (2007)
- Kuan CS, "Detection of respiratory viruses from ARTI patients by xTAG RVP fast v2 assay and conventional methods", Malays J Med Sci, 24, pp.33~43 (2017)
- Choudhary ML, "Comparison of the conventional multiplex RTPCR, real time RT-PCR and Luminex xTAG® RVP fast assay for the detection of respiratory viruses", J Med Virol, 88, pp.51~57 (2016)
- Smith J, "Semi-quantitative analysis of influenza samples using the Luminex xTAG® respiratory viral panel kit", Toxicol Mech Methods, 22, pp.211~217 (2012)
- Gadsby NJ, "Comparison of the Luminex respiratory virus panel fast assay with in-house real-time PCR for respiratory viral infection diagnosis", J Clin Microbiol, 48, pp.2213~2216 (2010)
- Pabbaraju K, "Comparison of the Luminex xTAG respiratory viral panel with xTAG respiratory viral panel fast for diagnosis of respiratory virus infections", J Clin Microbiol, 49, pp.1738~1744 (2011)
- Takao S, "Simultaneous multiple assay (Luminex xTAG respiratory viral panel FAST assay) efficacy in human respiratory virus detection", Kansenshogaku Zasshi, 85, pp.31~36 (2011)
- Jokela P, "Performance of the Luminex xTAG respiratory viral panel fast in a clinical laboratory setting", J Virol Methods, 182, pp.82~86 (2012)
- Mansuy JM, "Performance of a rapid molecular multiplex assay for the detection of influenza and picornaviruses", Scand J Infect Dis, 44, pp.963~968 (2012)
- Salez N, "Evaluation of four commercial multiplex molecular tests for the diagnosis of acute respiratory infections", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0130378~ (2015)
- Esposito S, "Partial comparison of the NxTAG respiratory pathogen panel assay with the Luminex xTAG respiratory panel fast assay V2and singleplex real-time polymerase chain reaction for detection of respiratory pathogens", Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis, 86, pp.53~57 (2016)
- Luchsinger V, "Comparison of Luminex xTAG® RVP fast assay and real time RTPCR for the detection of respiratory viruses in adults with community-acquired pneumonia", J Med Virol, 88, pp.1173~1179 (2016)
- Thi Ty Hang V, "Evaluation of the Luminex xTAG respiratory viral panel FAST v2 assay for detection of multiple respiratory viral pathogens in nasal and throat swabs in Vietnam", Wellcome Open Res, 2, pp.80~ (2017)
- Page MJ, "The PRISMA 2020 statement : an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews", BMJ, 372, pp.n71~ (2021)
- Raymaekers M, "Timely diagnosis of respiratory tract infections : evaluation of the performance of the Respifinder assay compared to the xTAG respiratory viral panel assay", J Clin Virol, 52, pp.314~316 (2011)
- Radko S, "Evaluation of three commercial multiplex assays for the detection of respiratory viral infections", J Virol Methods, 248, pp.39~43 (2017)
- Esposito S, "Identification of human adenovirus in respiratory samples with Luminex respiratory virus panel fast V2 assay and real-time polymerase chain reaction", Int J Mol Sci, 17, pp.297~ (2016)
- Esposito S, "Characteristics and their clinical relevance of respiratory syncytial virus types and genotypes circulating in Northern Italy in five consecutive winter seasons", PLoS One, 10, pp.e0129369~ (2015)
- Garbino J, "Lower respiratory viral illnesses : improved diagnosis by molecular methods and clinical impact", Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 170, pp.1197~1203 (2004)
- Leber AL, "Multicenter evaluation of BioFire FilmArray respiratory panel 2 for detection of viruses and bacteria in nasopharyngeal swab samples", J Clin Microbiol, 56, pp.e01945-17~ (2018)
- Popowitch EB, "Comparison of the Biofire FilmArray RP, Genmark eSensor RVP, Luminex xTAG RVPv1, and Luminex xTAG RVP fast multiplex assays for detection of respiratory viruses", J Clin Microbiol, 51, pp.1528~1533 (2013)