Evaluating usability of and satisfaction with two types of dental CAD software
2
조회
0
다운로드
1
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: This study evaluated the usability of and satisfaction with two types of computer-aided design (CAD) software among users who had experience with dental implant CAD software and those who did not. Materials and Methods: Dental technicians (n = 20) who had previous experience with dental implant CAD Software and students from the College of Dentistry (n = 12) who had never designed implant custom abutments were asked to evaluate two types of CAD Software, Exocad and Deltanine. In addition, the participants were asked to fill out a structured questionnaire (Section 1: Entering basic information and retrieving files; Section 2: Setting conditions before abutment design; Section 3: Setting abutment design; and Section 4: Overall satisfaction). For the statistical analysis of the collected data, Mann-Whitney U test was used (α = .05). Results: The ease of design and satisfaction with the implant CAD Software, evaluated with respect to 21 statements divided into four Stages, were significantly higher for Exocad in both groups for Secion 1. For Sections 2 and 3, participants with experience evaluated Deltanine to be significantly better. For Section 4, both groups evaluated Exocad Software to be better. Conclusion: Overall, the Exocad Software was evaluated as having better usability and offering greater satisfaction. However, in terms of performance in the core of the design process, i.e. Sections 2 and 3, Deltanine was rated higher by the experienced users. Thus, if the user interface design parts are supplemented, Deltanine CAD Software could be put to a wider use in clinics.
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the usability of and satisfaction with two types of computer-aided design (CAD) software among users who had experience with dental implant CAD software and those who did not. Materials and Methods: Dental technicians (n = 20) who had previous experience with dental implant CAD Software and students from the College of Dentistry (n = 12) who had never designed implant custom abutments were asked to evaluate two types of CAD Software, Exocad and Deltanine. In addition, the participants were asked to fill out a structured questionnaire (Section 1: Entering basic information and retrieving files; Section 2: Setting conditions before abutment design; Section 3: Setting abutment design; and Section 4: Overall satisfaction). For the statistical analysis of the collected data, Mann-Whitney U test was used (α = .05). Results: The ease of design and satisfaction with the implant CAD Software, evaluated with respect to 21 statements divided into four Stages, were significantly higher for Exocad in both groups for Secion 1. For Sections 2 and 3, participants with experience evaluated Deltanine to be significantly better. For Section 4, both groups evaluated Exocad Software to be better. Conclusion: Overall, the Exocad Software was evaluated as having better usability and offering greater satisfaction. However, in terms of performance in the core of the design process, i.e. Sections 2 and 3, Deltanine was rated higher by the experienced users. Thus, if the user interface design parts are supplemented, Deltanine CAD Software could be put to a wider use in clinics.
참고문헌 (13)
- Tapie L, "Adaptation measurement of CAD", CAM dental crowns with X-ray micro-CT: metrological chain standardization and 3D gap size distribution, 2016, pp.4, 13~
- Fasbinder DJ, "Computerized technology for restorative dentistry", Am J Dent, 26, pp.115~120 (2013)
- van Noort R, "The future of dental devices is digital", Dent Mater, 28, pp.3~12 (2012)
- Miyazaki T, "A review of dental CAD", CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience, 2009, pp.28, 44~56
- Beuer F, "Digital dentistry: an overview of recent developments for CAD", CAM generated restorations, 2008, pp.204, 505~511
- Park JH, "Digital workflow for a dental prosthesis that considers lateral mandibular relation", J Prosthet Dent, 117, pp.340~344 (2017)
- Davidowitz G, "The use of CAD", CAM in dentistry, 2011, pp.55, 559~570
- Koch GK, "Accuracy in the digital workflow: from data acquisition to the digitally milled cast", J Prosthet Dent, 115, pp.749~754 (2016)
- Christensen GJ, "Impressions are changing: deciding on conventional, digital or digital plus in-office milling", J Am Dent Assoc, 140, pp.1301~1304 (2009)
- Lins L, "In vitro evaluation of the internal and marginal misfit of CAD", CAM zirconia copings, 2015, pp.113, 205~211
- 손큰바다, "두 종의 치과용 캐드 소프트웨어에 대한 반복학습의 효과", 구강회복응용과학지, 33(2), pp.88~96 (2017), 대한턱관절교합학회[DOI]
- Lijphart A. II, "The comparable-cases strategy in comparative research", Comp Polit Stud, 8, pp.158~177 (1975)
- 현소은, "유경험자과 무경험자의 브랜드 정보처리과정의 차이: 문화적 의미", 문화산업연구, 14(4), pp.159~168 (2014), 한국문화산업학회