A Historical and Philosophical Study on the Nature of Curriculum Studies
0
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
The fact that South Korean curriculum scholars formed many of their perspectives on curricular phenomena through the United States curriculum studies and literature cannot be repudiated. In order to analyze the influences of the United States curriculum studies in South Korea requires one who is able to combine the United States curriculum studies and South Korean curriculum studies with an extensive knowledge both of the literature and of history of each as well as the larger history of influences between these countries. No one is fully able to accomplish this task, and the extent of reading or knowledge it requires about both countries. However, this study is beginning of such a project that will hopefully grow through efforts of many scholars. As a prerequisite to doing this, at least in the process of doing so, this paper is an attempt to interpret a history of curriculum studies in the United States, to figure out the nature of curriculum studies in the United States, and eventually to provide insight to guide the curricular present and future. In short, this study is a preliminary study for pursuing further study of analyzing the influences of American curriculum studies into South Korea.
Abstract
The fact that South Korean curriculum scholars formed many of their perspectives on curricular phenomena through the United States curriculum studies and literature cannot be repudiated. In order to analyze the influences of the United States curriculum studies in South Korea requires one who is able to combine the United States curriculum studies and South Korean curriculum studies with an extensive knowledge both of the literature and of history of each as well as the larger history of influences between these countries. No one is fully able to accomplish this task, and the extent of reading or knowledge it requires about both countries. However, this study is beginning of such a project that will hopefully grow through efforts of many scholars. As a prerequisite to doing this, at least in the process of doing so, this paper is an attempt to interpret a history of curriculum studies in the United States, to figure out the nature of curriculum studies in the United States, and eventually to provide insight to guide the curricular present and future. In short, this study is a preliminary study for pursuing further study of analyzing the influences of American curriculum studies into South Korea.
참고문헌 (21)
- J. Goodlad, "The changing school curriculum", Fund for the Advancement of Education, ~ (1966)
- J. Schwab, "The practical: A language for curriculum", School Review, 78, pp.1~23 (1969)
- W. F. Pinar, "Notes on the curriculum field", Educational Researcher, 7(8), pp.5~12 (1978)
- E. Short, "Forms of curriculum inquiry" (1991), State University of New York Press
- J. R. Coombs, "Forms of curriculum inquiry", pp.27~41 (1991), State University of New York Press
- H. Taba, "Curriculum development: Theory and practice" (1962), Harcourt Brace
- M. Greene, "The professional significance of history of education", History of Education Quarterly, 7(2), pp.182~190 (1967)
- H. M. Kliebard, "The struggle for the American curriculum: 1893-1958" (1995), Routledge
- National Education Association Committee of Ten on Secondary School Studies, Report, , Government Printing Office, ~ (1893)
- M. Seguel, "The curriculum field: Its formative year" (1966), Teachers College Press
- D. F Walker, "Review of research in education", pp.268~308 (1975), F. E. Peacock
- W. H. Schubert, "Curriculum: Perspective, paradigm, and possibility" (1986), Macmillan
- M. J. Adler, "The paideia proposal: An educational manifesto" (1982), Macmillan
- J. Dewey, "Experience and education" (1938), Macmillan
- J. Dewey, "Democracy and education" (1916), Macmillan
- W. H. Kilpatrick, "The project method", Teachers College Record, 19(4), pp.319~335 (1918)
- G. S. Counts, "Dare the school build a new social order?" (1932), John Day Co
- M. Schiro, "Curriculum for better schools: The great ideological debate" (1978), Educational Technology Publications
- T. Brameld, "A philosophic approach to communism" (1933), University of Chicago Press
- Kilpatrick, W. H., "Remaking the curriculum" (1936), Newson
- L. T. Hopkins, "Integration, its meaning and application" (1937), Appleton