A comparative study of the improvement after different self-assessment methods of tooth preparation
1
조회
0
다운로드
0
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of tooth preparation abilities of students according to three selfassessment methods. Materials and Methods: forty-eight sophomores in Kyungpook National University College of Dentistry were divided into three experimental groups. Students performed tooth preparation of the left mandibular first molar for full gold crown. They performed self-assessment using the three methods (visual, digital, and putty index self-assessment group), and reperformed tooth preparation. An intraoral scanner was used to scan each tooth model (prepared tooth and unprepared tooth), and data were acquired in standard tessellation language (STL) file format. The STL files of prepared tooth and unprepared tooth were superimposed using the 3-dimensional analysis software (Geomagic control X). And the reduction amount was measured. In the statistical analysis, all values of reduction amount were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05). Results: The three self-assessment methods showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). The putty index self-assessment group showed the highest reduction in error than the digital self-assessment method. Conclusion: Within limitations of this study, students showed significant differences in improvement of tooth preparation ability according to the three self-evaluation methods.
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of tooth preparation abilities of students according to three selfassessment methods. Materials and Methods: forty-eight sophomores in Kyungpook National University College of Dentistry were divided into three experimental groups. Students performed tooth preparation of the left mandibular first molar for full gold crown. They performed self-assessment using the three methods (visual, digital, and putty index self-assessment group), and reperformed tooth preparation. An intraoral scanner was used to scan each tooth model (prepared tooth and unprepared tooth), and data were acquired in standard tessellation language (STL) file format. The STL files of prepared tooth and unprepared tooth were superimposed using the 3-dimensional analysis software (Geomagic control X). And the reduction amount was measured. In the statistical analysis, all values of reduction amount were analyzed with the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Kruskal-Wallis test (α = 0.05). Results: The three self-assessment methods showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.001). The putty index self-assessment group showed the highest reduction in error than the digital self-assessment method. Conclusion: Within limitations of this study, students showed significant differences in improvement of tooth preparation ability according to the three self-evaluation methods.
참고문헌 (14)
- Furness AR, "Limitations of surface mapping technology in accurately identifying critical errors in dental students’ crown preparations", J Dent Educ, 82, pp.69~75 (2018)
- Renne WG, "E4D Compare software: an alternative to faculty grading in dental education", J Dent Educ, 77, pp.168~175 (2013)
- Mays KA, "Utilizing CAD", CAM to measure total occlusal convergence of preclinical dental students’ crown preparations, 2016, pp.80, 100~107
- Callan RS, "Inter- and intrarater reliability using two different software versions of E4D Compare", J Dent Educ, 79, pp.711~718 (2015)
- Callan RS, "Reliability of CAD CAM technology in assessing crown preparations in a preclinical dental school environment", J Dent Educ, 78, pp.40~50 (2014)
- Callan RS, "The validity of using E4D Compare’s “% comparison” to assess crown preparations in preclinical dental education", J Dent Educ, 79, pp.1445~1451 (2015)
- Tiu J, "Effectiveness of crown preparation assessment software as an educational tool in simulation clinic: A pilot study", J Dent Educ, 80, pp.1004~1011 (2016)
- Callan RS, "Effect of employing different typodonts when using E4D compare for dental student assessment", J Dent Educ, 79, pp.705~710 (2015)
- Kateeb ET, "Utilising an innovative digital software to grade pre-clinical crown preparation exercise", Eur J Dent Educ, 21, pp.220~227 (2017)
- Liu L, "Evaluating the effectiveness of a preclinical practice of tooth preparation using digital training system: A randomized controlled trial", Eur J Dent Educ, 22, pp.e679~e686 (2018)
- Kozarovska A, "Implementation of a digital preparation validation tool in dental skills laboratory training", Eur J Dent Educ, 22, pp.115~121 (2018)
- Mays KA, "Dental students’ self-assessment of operative preparations using CAD", CAM: a preliminary analysis, 2014, pp.78, 1673~1680
- Park CF, "Dental students’ perceptions of digital assessment software for preclinical tooth preparation exercises", J Dent Educ, 81, pp.597~603 (2017)
- Zitzmann NU, "Dental students’ perceptions of digital and conventional impression techniques: A randomized controlled trial", J Dent Educ, 81, pp.1227~1232 (2017)