An Explanatory Study on the Performance of Socially Responsible Funds in Korea
0
조회
0
다운로드
7
인용
0
참고문헌
키워드
초록
This is an explanatory study which examines the performance of socially responsible funds in Korea. Recently, various stakeholders of corporations have higher standards for responsible business practices. Not only shareholders, but also consumers, employees, creditors, business partners, the authorities, and non-profit or non-government organizations demand that companies take responsibility for the consequences of the actions taken in their operations. The socially responsible investment is the outcome of such movements. Particularly, in Korea, there has been great interest in funds which aims the investment in socially responsible firms (or investments to improve firms to be socially responsible). These funds are called socially responsible investment funds. We compare the performance of the 18 socially responsible investment funds in terms of fund return with benchmark indexes in the Korean stock market. The empirical results reveal that there are no consistent differences in returns for funds compared with benchmark indexes. We find a piece of evidence that the fund performance exceeds one of the index used for a sample period examined. However, considering that the significance differences disappear afterwards, it seems that the evidence is weak at best. These findings are consistent with those in prior studies performed in other countries which yield inconsistent results on the out- or under-performance of SRI funds. In subsequent tests, we investigates the portfolio selection criteria for the SRI funds. We find that firms with large size and firms with less controlling shareholder ownership. These determinants are generally consistent with the investment criteria used by many institutional investors. Considering that there are significant inflows of money into SRI funds recently in Korea, this finding suggests that investors need to be careful when investing in these funds blindly because the fund does not guarantee outstanding performance. However, because the sample size used in this study is relatively small, the generalizability of this conclusion could be limited. Further study on this issue is recommended in the future when the sample size increases and history of the SRI funds become longer.
Abstract
This is an explanatory study which examines the performance of socially responsible funds in Korea. Recently, various stakeholders of corporations have higher standards for responsible business practices. Not only shareholders, but also consumers, employees, creditors, business partners, the authorities, and non-profit or non-government organizations demand that companies take responsibility for the consequences of the actions taken in their operations. The socially responsible investment is the outcome of such movements. Particularly, in Korea, there has been great interest in funds which aims the investment in socially responsible firms (or investments to improve firms to be socially responsible). These funds are called socially responsible investment funds. We compare the performance of the 18 socially responsible investment funds in terms of fund return with benchmark indexes in the Korean stock market. The empirical results reveal that there are no consistent differences in returns for funds compared with benchmark indexes. We find a piece of evidence that the fund performance exceeds one of the index used for a sample period examined. However, considering that the significance differences disappear afterwards, it seems that the evidence is weak at best. These findings are consistent with those in prior studies performed in other countries which yield inconsistent results on the out- or under-performance of SRI funds. In subsequent tests, we investigates the portfolio selection criteria for the SRI funds. We find that firms with large size and firms with less controlling shareholder ownership. These determinants are generally consistent with the investment criteria used by many institutional investors. Considering that there are significant inflows of money into SRI funds recently in Korea, this finding suggests that investors need to be careful when investing in these funds blindly because the fund does not guarantee outstanding performance. However, because the sample size used in this study is relatively small, the generalizability of this conclusion could be limited. Further study on this issue is recommended in the future when the sample size increases and history of the SRI funds become longer.
참고문헌 (20)
- Bauer, R, "International Evidence on Ethical Mutual Fund Performance and Investment Style", Journal of Banking and Finance, 29, pp.1751~1767 (2005)
- Derwall, J, "The Eco-Efficiency Premium Puzzle", Financial Analysts Journal, 61(2), pp.51~63 (2005)
- European Social Investment Forum, "The 2006 European SRI Study", http:, www.eurosif.org, pp.2007, ~
- Goldreyer, E, "The Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds: Incorporating Sociopolitical Information in Portfolio Selection", Managerial Finance, 25, pp.23~36 (1999)
- Gregory, A, "Ethical Unit Trust Financial Performance: Small Company Effects and Fund Size Effects", Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 24, pp.705~724 (1997)
- Hamilton, S, "Doing Well While Doing Good? The Investment Performance of Socially Responsible Mutual Funds", Financial Analyst Journal, 49(6), pp.62~66 (1993)
- Harrison, J. S, "Stakeholders, Social Responsibility and Performance: Empirical Evidence and Theoretical Perspectives", Academy of Management Journal, 42(5), pp.479~486 (1999)
- Kinder, P. D, "The Social Investment Almanac: A Comprehensive Guide to Socially Responsible Investing" (1992), Henry Holt & Co.
- Kreander, N, "The Financial Performance of European Ethical Funds 1996-1998", Journal of Accounting and Finance, 1, pp.3~22 (2002)
- Luther, R, "The Performance of Ethical Unit Trusts: Choosing an Appropriate Benchmark", British Accounting Review, 26, pp.77~89 (1994)
- Luther, R, "The Investment Performance of UK Ethical Unit Trusts", Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 5, pp.57~70 (1992)
- Mallin, C, "The Financial Performance of Ethical Investment Funds", Journal of Business, Finance and Accounting, 22, pp.483~496 (1995)
- Orlitzky, Marc, "Corporate Social and Financial Performance: A Meta-analysis", Organization Studies, 24(3), pp.403~411 (2003)
- The Price of Ethics: Evidence from Socially Responsible Mutual Funds, "Renneboog, L", European Corporate Governance Institute, ~, pp.Finance Working Paper No. 168 (2007), 2007
- Sauer,D, "The Impact of Social-responsibility Screens on Investment Performance: Evidence from the Domini 400 Social Index and Domini Equity Mutual Fund", Review of Financial Economics, 6, pp.137~149 (1997)
- Schröder,M, "Socially Responsible Investments in Germany, Switzerlandand the United States; An Analysis of Investment Funds and Indices", Discussion Paper No. 03-10, ~ (2003), ZEW(Zentrum für Europäische Wirtschaftsforschung GmbH,Centre for European Economic Research)
- Schröder,M, "Is there a Difference?: The Performance Characteristics of SRI Equity Indexes", Discussion paper No. 05-50, ~ (2005), ZEW
- Social Investment Forum, "2005 Report on Socially Responsible Investing Trends in the United States: 10-Year Review", Social Investment Forum, 2006, ~
- Statman,M, "Socially Responsible Mutual Funds", Financial Analysts Journal, 56(3), pp.30~39 (2000)
- Yon,K.H, "The Role and Responsibility of SRI Funds", Corporate Governance Review, 30(1) (2007)